this post was submitted on 05 Jul 2025
426 points (94.4% liked)

politics

24592 readers
2850 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Welp...

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old

What could go wrong?

[–] Etterra@discuss.online 17 points 5 hours ago

Split the Republican party bro. That'll really own the libs.

[–] bitwolf@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

How? I thought a prereq was to do a certain amount of philanthropy or action at the local level first.

[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Is that why he's suddenly criticizing Trump? He thinks he can split the Democratic vote?

[–] meme_historian@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 hours ago

I don't think he's THAT delusional. But he might be targeting the libertarian crypto fiends and techno-fascists that have gathered around the MAGA platform during the last election.

[–] Jax@sh.itjust.works 28 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

Nazis. They're Nazis. This is Nazis.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 3 points 3 hours ago

The only good thing of that is that the otherwise shitty FPTP system will make him and Trump go for each others throat.

[–] Wolf@lemmy.today 12 points 8 hours ago

It's Musk so he'll probably rebrand them as NaXis.

Maybe enough MAGAts will join him that it will split the vote and it will get easier to get people with basic human decency elected. That is assuming we continue to have elections.

[–] Furbag@lemmy.world 12 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

I just want to remind anyone thinking that this is a good thing because it will siphon off voters from the Republican Party - Elon Musk is only doing this because Trump cut the EV mandate from the Big Bullshit Bill and didn't appoint his guy to NASA. No matter what he says about spending or debt ceilings, he doesn't care about any of it and was in the loop the entire time that legislation was being crafted. He's still only in this for himself, just as he was when he gleefully threw a Nazi salute on stage thinking he just got everything he could ever want when he bought the president his office.

[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

He can be in it for himself, and it can still be a good thing for us

[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 3 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

As much as I fucking hate Musk, he does understand two things:

  1. EVs will never be the mainstream without federal and state project support
  2. Funneling money from the government to billionaires is the worst thing for an economy

What I find fucking mind-blowing is that this idiot is selling a shoddy EV and solar product at premium costs to other idiots, but very much aligned with Democrats on the two points above. Not only did he back the wrong horse, he straight up accidentally got on the wrong horse, and rode it threw towns away from where he was living very comfortably.

Now this fucking moron needs to invent new ways to make Tesla appealing to the "normies" because nobody is buying his bullshit stalling tactics or premium pricing for sub-par products.

I've got my popcorn ready, but the siphoning of votes away from Trump is just the butter on top.

[–] pupbiru@aussie.zone 3 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (2 children)
  1. EVs will never be the mainstream without federal and state project support

in not sure about that… imo EVs would be relatively comparable if ICE vehicles and oil didn’t have massive subsidies at every stage from governments.. more if negative externalities were properly accounted for

or maybe not: in australia we have a fuel excise and EV credit and they’re still pretty expensive relative to ICE

[–] dickalan@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

I know you meant internal combustion engine, but it gave me a pause because I thought you were talking about ice agents

[–] pupbiru@aussie.zone 1 points 2 hours ago

i absolutely agree and considered using a different phrase but it’s been the phrase to use for fossil fuel powered cars for so long i decided they don’t get to exclusively steal it

[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

EV's only become popular when cheaper. It's a fact.

Not everyone lives in areas where solar installs at ean option. The offset doesn't make sense when you go north or south of the globe where the sun don't shine.

[–] jsomae@lemmy.ml 24 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (1 children)

I hope this becomes big enough to split the right-wing vote. I wish him all the success possible.

[–] thericofactor@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 hour ago

Until right before the election he concedes and his voters go republican.

[–] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 19 points 10 hours ago

The neo-Nazi saluting bastard wants a political party? F-him and strip him of US citizenship for illegally working in the USA.

If anyone has a chance to create another party. AOC and Mamdani.

[–] Ferroto@lemmy.world 5 points 7 hours ago

Wow this might just turn Elon Musk into a millionaire.

[–] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 10 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

I hope that he sloughs off enough support from the Geronocrats and Turdpublicans to give the Progressive movement a chance to become mainstream. In a battle between four armies, I think AOC would win.

[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 6 points 5 hours ago

An AOC/Sanders ticket is starting to make sense, aside from Bernie's age.

Harris needs to stay away from this next race.

Newsom is a fucking snake, and I wouldn't for him to be prez.

Whitmer and Gillibrand both just did a fast turn to fascistic and racist bullshit.

Pritzker is a billionaire, but says the right things.

If Mamdani does great shit really fast, he could be a VP pick in 2032, but he needs to prove some shit and can't be president.

I just feel like the field is pretty limited right now. We don't have all the good ideas at all the right times from any candidates, but we have the best ideas right now through just a few people. Voters are desperate to displace all this bullshit that is happening right now, and we just need a better crop of candidates overall. This isn't even on the left, but the right leaning people need to get some sane fucking choices back as well.

[–] SnarkoPolo@lemmy.world 27 points 13 hours ago

Has he filed any paperwork? Gathered any signatures?

Didn't think so. It's just typical Elmo Skum: hurricane force hot air scented with billionaire quantities of bovine effluvia.

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 42 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

How many weeks before he gets bored and abandons it when things don’t immediately work, just like everything else in his useless life?

[–] match@pawb.social 14 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

unlike rockets or cars, political party success in America is measured in dollars

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 13 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

He already bought himself an entire department with no oversight but got bored of it after a few months.

[–] AZX3RIC@lemmy.world 3 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

In 1962, Congress created the role of "special government employee," which allows the executive branch, the legislative branch and independent federal agencies to bring on employees for specific roles on a temporary basis.

SGEs are limited to working for the government for no more than 130 days out of a 365-day period, though they can work multiple years, and they can either be paid or unpaid. NPR has reported that Musk is not being paid for his work with DOGE.

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 3 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

He didn’t make it to 130 days. He never mentioned that. Also, the law does not constrain this administration. He got bored when he didn’t immediately become loved and gave up like the little baby he is. Stop giving these bumbling oligarchs the benefit of the doubt and a veneer of legitimacy. You are an active part of the problem when you do.

[–] ltxrtquq@lemmy.ml 4 points 9 hours ago

If you're just going to copy and paste from an NPR article, you might as well provide a link while you're at it.

[–] mazzilius_marsti@lemmy.world 25 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

A white South African dude created the American Party

ffs did somebody step on a bug in 2015 and change the whole timeline?

[–] excral@feddit.org 2 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

Is there anything more American than aliens claiming to be the true Americans?

[–] match@pawb.social 9 points 14 hours ago

I'm thinking of doing a Ghost Dance to bring Harambe back

[–] glitchdx@lemmy.world 32 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

I fail to see how splitting up the fascists is anything but a good thing. Let them fight.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] jaggedrobotpubes@lemmy.world 7 points 12 hours ago

Good time to make a fourth party.

[–] markstos@lemmy.world 25 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

I’m sure Tesla shareholders are happy to hear he’s picked up another side project.

[–] IhaveCrabs111@lemmy.world 8 points 16 hours ago

Don’t you remember? He’s a super genius!

[–] AeonFelis@lemmy.world 14 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (6 children)

Reading the article to see what ridiculous name he's going to give it.

"The America Party"?

TBH, pretty tame in Musk standards. At least it's pronounceable.

[–] AngryRobot@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

He named it that so their members are called "Americans." He's trying to steal our national identity for his new Nazi party.

[–] hopesdead@startrek.website 1 points 8 hours ago

Correction: At least you can read it.

[–] aceshigh@lemmy.world 6 points 15 hours ago

The name is to make a grab at the r’s. If it wasn’t, he would have named it the x party.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Vanilla_PuddinFudge@infosec.pub 8 points 16 hours ago

Odd strategy.

Leftists won't buy it, and most liberals aren't going to buy it, and it might divide the right, while team blue is fracturing.

Gonna be a 4 on one, not a 3.

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 31 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

I hope this would split the vote among magas and republicans and the dems would be a shoe in. Sadly, I've lost a lot of faith in the dems and their ability to effectively fight for the people. Maybe we need even more parties?

[–] Triasha@lemmy.world 5 points 9 hours ago

Dems won't do shit to make people's lives better but they won't open up concentration camps and will mostly leave trans people alone.

Unless the dinosaurs talking shit about Mamdani and AOC are brought to heel.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›