this post was submitted on 07 Jun 2025
289 points (98.0% liked)

politics

24124 readers
3385 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Elon Musk publicly mused about creating a new political party this week, an idea that could escalate the billionaire's feud with his onetime ally President Trump.

Musk first floated the idea on Thursday. In between jabs at Mr. Trump, the billionaire posted a poll to X asking his 220 million followers if they think it's "time to create a new political party in America that actually represents the 80% in the middle."

A day later, Musk noted that 80% of respondents to the poll backed the idea.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] skulblaka@sh.itjust.works 17 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Thing is, he's absolutely right. It's way beyond past time to create a powerful political third party in the US that genuinely represents the interest of the people.

Elon Musk, however, should not be allowed anywhere within brick throwing distance of it.

Nor should most anyone else who is actually capable of funding it. Herein lies our actual problem.

[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 9 points 6 days ago (1 children)

The real problem is with the way elections work. Any third party started in this system that's successful will wind up being absorbed by or absorbing one of the other two.

[–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 2 points 6 days ago

That's not actually a problem, though. It's better when both parties support your issue; then there is no viable opposition to that issue.

[–] Etterra@discuss.online 12 points 6 days ago

Split the Republican party!

[–] limelight79@lemmy.world 7 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Anyone remember Ross Perot? He created the Tea Party, which eventually took over the Republican party.

[–] harmsy@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

Let's hope this causes more Perot-esque vote spoilers on the right wing.

[–] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 6 points 6 days ago

Fuck no. While I very much want more parties, a party created by and for oligarchs would suck the donkiest of elephant balls.

[–] barneypiccolo@lemm.ee 6 points 6 days ago

Yeah, you do that buddy, spend lots of money, too. Every single vote he draws will come from HitlerPig, not the Dems.

[–] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 4 points 6 days ago

Excellent idea. You do that, Elon.

[–] mhague@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago (1 children)

"What if we made a party that represented everyone?"

Holy shit, I don't think anyone's thought of that. Jamie, check the web to see if people ever tried creating a party for the rest of us.

Chat, type 1 if you think having a party that represents 80% of America is a good idea.

[–] Nastybutler@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

That's the joke. Every party says they represent most people, but end up in the pocket of the wealthy and corporate interests of it gets big enough

[–] zr0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 6 days ago

Reminds me of Ye and his public stunts.

[–] ikidd@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago

Do it you coward.

[–] Akasazh 2 points 6 days ago

'I'll make my own party with blackjack and hookers'

[–] Frostbeard@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago

The vote of 80% of the people that are lefton Shitter doesn't say much. And how many responded?

[–] Robbity@lemm.ee 1 points 6 days ago

Call it American Party X and we have a deal.

[–] Railcar8095@lemm.ee 1 points 6 days ago

Are we gonna have a reverse Obama, were they claim Trump was actually born on Mississippi and that the SA birth certificate is fake?

“I’ll make my owl political party! With blackjack and hookers!”

[–] foggy@lemmy.world 123 points 1 week ago (2 children)

What a loser. But please, by all means. Fracture Trump's base.

[–] joyjoy@lemmy.zip 1 points 6 days ago

At the same time, let AOC and Sanders make a fourth party, also splintering the Democratic Party.

[–] PotatoLibre@feddit.it 24 points 1 week ago (10 children)

Until he will be persecuted and will hide in Russia, which will drive Donald to help Ukraine in the end.

I really reallu hooe I will be right.

[–] thepenismightier@lemm.ee 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

If anywhere else he'll go to China.

[–] PotatoLibre@feddit.it 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

China does not like problems, they want to look calm, affordable and keep aelling their stuff.

I don't really see why they should care about a loser like Musk.

[–] huppakee@lemm.ee 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I don't think they'd give him asylum from the goodness of their heart but this man has a lot to offer as long as he's an enemy of the US government.

[–] Alaik@lemmy.zip 1 points 6 days ago

Plus the whole illegal access to US institution systems Krasnov gave him.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] Cris_Color@lemmy.world 80 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

"the 80% of people in the middle" that do Nazi salutes and say Germany should forget the national shame of the Holocaust, while flying to Germany to campaign for and praise the modern day Nazi party...

How very centrist 😅

[–] spamfajitas@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 6 days ago

Tbh I'm a little surprised he didn't say it was 88%

[–] alaphic@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago (1 children)

All while being so k-holed out your pee-hole don't work no more... 😋 Aaaand attempting to lure anyone with a working uterus and a twitter account into his weird natal cult...

Clearly just very normal activities that every American engages in on a daily basis.

I like how you have to specify that it's a natal cult because he broke his dick and is effectively infertile through natural means. Also a natal cult is much more pathetic than a sex cult, at least someone is having fun in the sex cult.

[–] Stern@lemmy.world 52 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yes, please steal 5-6% of the R vote.

[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

It'll rope in a lot of dem centrists too.

[–] Alaik@lemmy.zip 2 points 6 days ago

Just call them Republicans.

[–] Witchfire@lemmy.world 40 points 1 week ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

So then the US will have three right wing parties. Choose your flavor:

  • Corporate Neoliberal Party
  • American Nazi Party
  • White Apartheid Apologists
[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 4 points 6 days ago

I love how this was the thrust of the Russian meddling campaign, using #bothsides to build voter apathy.

I'm not saying you're a Russian meddler, but I know the source of that duck quacking noise I was hearing.

[–] gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world 37 points 1 week ago

Andrew Yang rn

[–] Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world 30 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The Nazi party isn't new, dipshit.

I'm all for it because it will split Trump's vote, but there's really no point as there won't be free elections for anything more serious than dog catcher in the US until the fash have been forcibly evicted.

The democratic options expired Jan 20th 2025. Resist.

[–] IhaveCrabs111@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Remember when he was going to make a new iPhone when he was having panic attacks about apple banning twitter? This will be just like that. The guy jumps from thought to thought like the direction of the wind. He can’t follow through on anything himself, he just throws some money at it and pretends that he does the work. So many people could do so much more than him if they had his resources.

[–] voxthefox@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 1 week ago

What i was thinking, only way he ends up doing this is if someone else does it, it's successful, and he buys the party, that's the only thing he's been good at, and basically what he tried with trump.

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The party logo will be an ancient far eastern peace symbol.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Little8Lost@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago (4 children)

i hope he succeeds in creating a third party because it will break the 2 party system and opens the idea to vote for another option to americans.

And i hope the party then gets taken over by people in favor of unions and stuff

Hoping the third party fractures the right is all you can hope for while we're a first-past-the-post voting country. Any new party popular enough to displace a party will simply become the other second party and create the same mediocrity. Until then, it would just siphon votes from the closest two-party option.

The only way this gets fixed is by ranked choice or similar voting systems, that remove the tactical voting incentive.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›