this post was submitted on 23 Apr 2025
712 points (94.2% liked)

Political Memes

7873 readers
2542 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 37 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] stebo02@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

can someone explain these terms to someone who has never played poker?

[–] CubitOom@infosec.pub 55 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (1 children)
  • 1st panel: Trump bets all his money. Normally this is done either if you are confident you will win (like if you have a winning hand). Or if you are trying to win by bluffing (lying by signaling that you have a winning hand when you don't have one). But a good player would only bluff if they thought the other player has little chance of having a winning hand, especially if betting all chips. Ideally, you would only go all in if you had a low chance of having a winning hand but somehow got one and the other player thinks you're bluffing so they stay in the game.
  • 2nd panel: Xi calls Trump's bluff and matches Trump's bet, because he knows he will win.
  • 3rd panel: Trump realizes that his bluff was called and he will probably lose.
  • 4th panel: Trump forfeits all his money to Xi. There is now no way to get his chips back. It would be better to continue to play on the off chance that Xi was bluffing and they both have bad hands but Trump's was slightly stronger than Xis. At the very least it would reveal if Xi was bluffing or not and what his hand was. However by folding not only does he give all his money to Xi but he also learns nothing about his opponents strategies.

Basically this is something the worst poker player in the world might do.

[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world -1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

However by folding not only does he give all his money to Xi but he also learns nothing about his opponents strategies.

Has Trump ceded any money to Xi? He did go all in but hasn't he taken it almost all out again?

[–] null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

No.

Implementing the tariffs has destroyed the US' credibility as a trade partner.

They've doubled down with the tariffs on China.

Trump specifically has lost all credibility as a negotiator. Everyone knows he will fold if he can find a way out that allows him to at least say that he won.

The damage will take decades to correct.

[–] theparadox@lemmy.world 10 points 5 hours ago

Actually, the worldwide tariffs may have accelerated worldwide dedollarization. The world may move away from considering the American dollar the most safe and stable currency. That would impact the US's ability to borrow by increasing interest rates for bonds, spiking the national debt. This is what is believed to have spooked Trump into "pausing" tariffs at 10% or whatever the fuck he's saying now.

[–] NikkiDimes@lemmy.world 20 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

All-in - you've put in everything you have.
Call - You match the current bet.
Folding - exiting the hand, forfeiting the money you've bet so far.

Folding after being all-in is pointless, because you have nothing left to lose and I don't even think you can technically do it, but you're a complete and utter moron if you do it and should probably not be playing poker for money.

[–] hOrni@lemmy.world 131 points 15 hours ago (4 children)

You can easily tell it's AI, because Trump's hands are too big.

[–] Akasazh 5 points 5 hours ago

And there is a picture he realizes he's fucked up. Never happens irl

[–] stebo02@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

the only good use of AI slop

[–] hOrni@lemmy.world 2 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

I agree. Making memes is fun with AI. I would like to make some, but I am so technically illiterate, that I don't even know how to generate an image from a prompt.

[–] Tja@programming.dev 1 points 1 hour ago

Ask chat gpt how!

[–] samus12345@lemm.ee 17 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Xinnie the Pooh changes places with Trump, judging by the table.

[–] Sc00ter@lemm.ee 15 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

And the chip count is wildly inconsistent for whats assumed to be 1 hand

[–] Klear@sh.itjust.works 2 points 8 hours ago

The chip count represents the market stability.

[–] then_three_more@lemmy.world 4 points 11 hours ago

And he's kind of smiling in the first frame.

[–] taiyang@lemmy.world 45 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Meh AI, but I do like the idea of folding on an All In. You generally can't do that, but given the rule breaking this administration does, I can see it.

[–] CubitOom@infosec.pub 18 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

You can do it...it's just really fucking dumb. It's a great way to give someone all your chips.

I've seen it when someone doesn't want to expose exactly what hand they had. A high pair 'all in' is very different to a 2, 7 unsuited hand.

[–] taiyang@lemmy.world 9 points 8 hours ago

I only ever play poker in digital contexts and they always just assume you're not going to fold, button greyed out, game auto plays, etc. I imagine irl, they will just laugh at your stupid ass.

[–] RoidingOldMan@lemmy.world 18 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

I don't think he ever believed his own BS on this one. He's pumping and dumping the whole stock market on his tariff announcements.

Yeah, but I think this is more about those art of the deal folks who still have to pretend he's a master negotiator.

[–] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 57 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

The chip stacks changing all the time bothers me.

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 25 points 16 hours ago

That's because they're not his chips, and how many he has depends on how many his owners give him.

[–] Eheran@lemmy.world 14 points 16 hours ago

Both sitting at the same location is worse for me. But overall it is okay.

[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 3 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

Bluffer turned fluffer. Explains him

[–] Nyticus@kbin.melroy.org 0 points 6 hours ago

Trump with a sissy Pair.

Xi with at least a threatening Full House.

[–] Nay 16 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

I hate that it's AI, but it's so gorram true...

[–] Vince@lemmy.world 21 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

This feels like what it should be used for though. Dumb, low effort memes, where the idea is more important that the quality or fidelity of the art.

[–] petrol_sniff_king@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

I'm trying to think of how this would be done without AI, actually, and I don't really know.

It is funnier with Trump and Xi here. Maybe. Maybe stock photo could have worked, but... I dunno.

It is funnier with Trump's facial expression in the third panel.

We obviously don't have pictures of Trump and Xi playing poker.

I do agree that the idea here is much more important than the visuals.

I'm just really struggling to be upset with this one.

[–] dvoraqs@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

Before AI, people manually "Photoshopped" images with different image editing tools. These people took elements from different existing images and put them together to create a new one.

[–] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 3 points 9 hours ago

You could draw a cartoon depicting the same situation, but that's hours of work for a skilled artist.

[–] Nay 6 points 15 hours ago

Which is why I hate it.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 9 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Anti AI people gonna come shit on this. I’m anti-AI but they ain’t asked me.

[–] riquisimo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

"Eww, slop"

"But also, it's a stupid joke. Low effort joke made with low effort means..."

"...eww, low effort slop."

[–] No_Money_Just_Change@feddit.org 1 points 9 hours ago

It's a good joke, but it would have been better for the environment to make it in Photoshop, Gimp or sth similar

[–] boreengreen@lemm.ee 3 points 13 hours ago

This made me laugh.

[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 0 points 10 hours ago

he needs putin at the table so he folds, even witha winning hand.