The post on its own was completely fine! Then for some reason you decided to edit it… with a perfectly summarized illustration of the reason for almost every rule 1 violation removal we do on a daily basis here.
I’m absolutely baffled….
Oh no! Wormtongue isn’t popular amongst those that didn’t vote for him?
Say it ain’t so!
Ahh, but you’re forgetting the Rules for Thee clause that protects any and all wealthy, white, corporate gremlins from facing the same or similar consequences that any of the poors might face for the same infraction.
…argued that he was too “woke” and too concerned with diversity in the armed forces.
Soooo… that’s exactly what the world needs:
A military comprised of American klansmen, hell bent on purifying the bloodlines of every country they set a jackbooted foot in.
All well and good, but he now has the military under his thumb and firmly planted up his ass. There’s no one left that has the authority to tell him he can’t.
Mr beast is an actual person?
And rightfully so. We currently have a dictator that is threatening to absorb them into the collective shithole that America has become…
I cannot blame them one bit and I’m surprised the percentage is that low.
Haven’t seen a more apt example of a face eaten by a leopard in quite a while. This is about as cut-and-dry as it gets.
The facts? They didn’t.
This is an insult to the concept of pets.
They voted for Trump.
When we see people suggesting violence, we usually take care of it. But there’s quite a bit of nuance to what constitutes removal and what is just… wishful thinking.