this post was submitted on 26 Jun 2025
467 points (97.6% liked)

politics

24370 readers
3454 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Anomalocaris@lemm.ee 5 points 3 hours ago

time to tell everyone NY democrats to "Vote blue no matter who"

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 3 points 5 hours ago

Yo if telling yourselves that headline is what it takes to get you dudes out there to vote for the DNC so they can get to ending Citizens United, creating fair elections maps, taxing the rich, and expanding medical coverage: power to you. Let's go!

[–] inb4_FoundTheVegan@lemmy.world 24 points 11 hours ago

Fuck I hope so...

[–] FreakinSteve@lemmy.world 11 points 11 hours ago

No. AOC was.

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 7 points 10 hours ago

I fervently hope so.

[–] CromulantCrow@lemmy.zip 7 points 11 hours ago

Every time something hopeful like this appears I start wondering if it's safe to imagine that maybe things could get better here in the US. But so far I've been disappointed over and over. Part of me wants to just skip over the "maybe something good will happen" part and get right to the "oh, well, looks like he was assassinated by a blackwater hit squad" part. Money is power. The donor class gets what they want. And I have no faith that working within the electoral system will fix that.

[–] kameecoding@lemmy.world 21 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Is it though? Or is it wishful thinking?

[–] berno@lemmy.world 20 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Dems are cooked. Nobody is buying the old guard bullshit anymore. Embrace populism or go the way of the Whigs

[–] normalexit@lemmy.world 8 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Maybe, probably. They are going to gamble that they can stay the same because people are/will be so mad about... well everything.

They can prop up a white male moderate with an ounce of charisma, someone that is around 45. People will be refreshed that this candidate speaks in complete sentences and the capacity for empathy -- like a real person.

That's what they want, business as usual sold as a revolutionary idea. Will people buy it? Who knows.. groups of people are pretty dumb.

[–] anarchiddy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 16 hours ago

They are going to gamble that they can stay the same because people are/will be so mad about… well everything.

They will 100% try to do this, but they'll end up losing and then blame the voters they're maligning. Mamdani is a case-in-point difference between status quo candidate turnouts and progressive candidate turnout. The 7% delta over Cuomo is the 7% they'll lose if they try it again.

[–] nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 28 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

I wish. It's a clear message from the constituency, but no one ever blamed the DNC for listening ti their voters too much.

[–] anarchiddy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 16 hours ago

Either they listen to their voters and become a 'new' democratic party, or they'll continue bleeding numbers and die. Either way, it's still the beginning of the end.

[–] CH3DD4R_G0BL1N@sh.itjust.works 38 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I’m no political scientist, but I’d think he needs to win the general before this can be said.

[–] barneypiccolo@lemm.ee 27 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Beating well-established Democratic royalty on their home turf by a Muslim is a pretty solid punch in the face.

He even had Clinton's endorsement. This was a very clear Fuck You to the Democratic party.

[–] howrar@lemmy.ca 3 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Was there actually an endorsement? All I'm finding is that Bill Clinton congratulated him on the primary victory.

[–] anarchiddy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 15 hours ago

It's indicative of a deep, irreversible rift in the party. Either democrats adapt or they split in half.

[–] wanderwisley@lemm.ee 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Agreed but this is a good start.

[–] CH3DD4R_G0BL1N@sh.itjust.works 15 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

For sure, but we’ve seen hope like this go down the drain before. The circumstances here were favorable I think. RCV primary against an unlikable and disgraced opponent in NYC is hardly a death knell for the national corpo Dems

[–] wanderwisley@lemm.ee 7 points 23 hours ago

Agreed as well, and I don’t wanna jump for joy yet but we gotta take our victories as they come. Hopefully this is a snowball that causes an avalanche of change.

[–] WatDabney@lemmy.dbzer0.com 87 points 1 day ago (14 children)

I'm afraid it's too late though.

It's possible - arguably even likely - that the Dem establishment still won't get the message and will instead continue to try to con us into supporting corrupt neolib hacks and will continue to undermine actual leftists.

In fact, I sort of half expect the New York party to abandon Mamdani and instead back a write-in campaign for Cuomo.

I wish I was kidding.

Even if they show never-before-seen integrity and determination and actualy shift back toward supporting actual leftists (or get replaced by a new generation of leaders who will), I still think it's likely going to be too late. The longer Trump and his ilk remain in office, the more likely it becomes that opposing them will just get you on the next flight to some overseas concentration camp, or dead, or both.

[–] theneverfox@pawb.social 8 points 16 hours ago

The Democrats are going to try to ratfuck him, sure. They're never going to get the message

But this is how we clean them out. This is why AOC and Bernie are doing rallies - so that every seat that comes up is filled with a progressive. And this is a big seat

As for it being too late... Yeah, we're fucked. But we can still make things better. There's no reason to yield ground, maga is incredibly incompetent - they can be beat.

And there will be an after

[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

100%. The DNC are not our friends and havent been for a while now.

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 25 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I wouldn't be surprised if the establishment decides open corruption is pretty cool actually and starts trying to rehabilitate Adams' image. Seems like trying to run both Adams and Cuomo is a fools errand and Adams is stubborn enough to stay in regardless so they'll have to go with him.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 4 points 21 hours ago

Yeah hope has security detail. I worry ICE going grab him and disappear him. Especially if it looks like he will win the general election.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] PixelPilgrim@lemmings.world 43 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Ehhh zorhan primary win is more like first big hurtle. Now ZOHRAN has to deal with belligerent part of democratic party and independent runs

[–] hitmyspot@aussie.zone 24 points 1 day ago (2 children)

He already has, up to this point. In fact, big parts of the party tried to support his competition. They failed. He's another in AOC mould. He may be good or great but there is an increasing trickle of progressive candidates.

The more that win by being good the more that can win without being so good. He may not be the Dems saviour but he's a step in the right direction and a worrying sign for Republicans and establishment politicians.

[–] PixelPilgrim@lemmings.world 5 points 19 hours ago

Yeah I'm just saying there's a lot more to go even in this race alone. Just because ZOHRAN WON the primary that doesn't mean the Democrats leadership will be happy about it

[–] oh_@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Indeed, they dusted off big Bill Clinton even.

[–] arrow74@lemm.ee 11 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (2 children)

When I hear that Clinton endorsed a canidate my first thought was, who cares. That guy hasn't been in office for over 25 years now. Talk about irrelevant

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 2 points 10 hours ago

It's not for us, it's for wealthier donors.

[–] FreakinSteve@lemmy.world 2 points 10 hours ago

Its the Dem tradition of hierarchy, nepotism, and dynasty-slurping

[–] jared@mander.xyz 47 points 1 day ago
load more comments
view more: next ›