this post was submitted on 15 Apr 2025
374 points (99.0% liked)

politics

22913 readers
3852 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A new CBS News/YouGov poll showed that Americans are increasingly critical of Trump's handling of the economy, and that more people are blaming him than a month earlier. It surveyed 2,410 U.S. adults from April 8 to 11.

When asked whose policies are more responsible for the state of the economy, 54% said they believe Trump's policies are more to blame. Only 21% said they believe Biden's policies are to blame. 20% said both of their policies are equally to blame, while 5% said neither are to blame for the state of the economy.

This compares to a March CBS News poll, when 38% of respondents said they blamed Biden for inflation, while only 34% blamed Trump.

A poll from YouGov and The Economist also showed that more Americans are blaming Trump for the economy.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] selkiesidhe@lemm.ee 5 points 3 hours ago

Surveyed 2400 people. Out of that miniscule portion of the population, those were the results.

MAGAts are still fully stuck to drumpfs ass like remora. They will NEVER change their minds.

[–] MehBlah@lemmy.world 13 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

The economy is being used to distract from the crimes of his followers. Too much concentration on that and not enough on how he wants send US citizens to a prison in a foreign country without any real due process.

[–] mondomon@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Concentration is a good word for this, as in camps.

[–] MehBlah@lemmy.world 3 points 1 hour ago

Its why I used that word.

[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 16 points 8 hours ago

Oh no, Trump is polling poorly? Surely if he wants to be elected again he will change course...

[–] samus12345@lemm.ee 15 points 9 hours ago

"You idiots put me in power and I'm not leaving, don't care."

[–] Jhex@lemmy.world 32 points 12 hours ago

gov going full fascist, journalists pretending polling matters

let the music continue until the titanic is fully sunk

[–] octopus_ink@slrpnk.net 59 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (6 children)

20% said both of their policies are equally to blame

What the fuck is wrong with 20% of respondents? I can understand blaming it on Biden better than I can understand this response.

[–] Milk_Sheikh@lemm.ee 6 points 8 hours ago

In any other presidential term, that can be a fair assessment only a few months in. The economy can be compared to a Panamax oil tanker - it moves with huge momentum and can’t be steered quickly.

But this tariffs nonsense detonated a bomb below the waterline. You may not be able to steer the ship quickly, but deliberate sabotage can absolutely cripple it and spread damage everywhere. Quarterly 401(k) statements are being sent out, plus it’s tax season, so people are very in touch with how this is impacting them and their money

[–] celeste@kbin.earth 51 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

They know it's trump's fault but they voted for him so they have to say biden was just as bad for the economy to justify their decision to themselves. That's my theory.

[–] Jaysyn@lemmy.world 28 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Yep. Trump cultists absolutely can't admit when they are objectively wrong, even as their small business crashes, their investments and retirement shrink or their spouse is deported.

It is a serious personality flaw.

[–] resipsaloquitur@lemm.ee 7 points 13 hours ago

Trump can’t fail us, we can only fail Trump.

[–] barneypiccolo@lemm.ee 5 points 9 hours ago

They are ruled by their hatred, and MAGA is a hate group.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 20 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (1 children)

They're absolutely checked out and ignorant. They have no idea what either's policies actually were and they aren't even paying enough attention to get brainwashed into MAGA, so they just hedge by blaming both.

Those are the vast majority of non-voters who sleepwalked us into fascism, BTW. The Gaza protest types the neolibs keep trying to scapegoat, although indeed idiots who cut off their noses to spite their face, were way too few to be the real cause of Harris's loss.

[–] mister_flibble@lemm.ee 14 points 13 hours ago

In my limited interaction with people who have moved away from Trump, there seems to be a "well they all actually fucking suck" stage in the middle. Would guess it's that.

[–] anarchrist@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 14 hours ago

Radical centrist brainworms

[–] MagicShel@lemmy.zip 17 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

It's cute that people think voters opinions are going to matter much longer.

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 6 points 10 hours ago

They do still rely heavily on their base being supportive as their power base. This is also drivibg a lot of people in minor positions of power not to resist. If that were to evaporate significantly I could could see things changing significantly.

But I doubt it will.

[–] yarr 6 points 9 hours ago

True believers will blame anyone and everyone else but Trump. It's been amusing watching the excuses get more and more convoluted. It's especially ridiculous because several times on the run-up to the election, Trump mentioned that if he had ONE DAY in office, he'd fix things.

Now he's in and it's either "well, things are real tricky" or "Biden has crippled us for generations". Totally embarrassing, but it's nothing I didn't expect.

[–] underwater@sh.itjust.works 74 points 15 hours ago (4 children)

Because he’s the one currently tanking the economy. Fuck Trump - even as a conservative, I can say that he and the current Republicans are awful. They singlehandedly pushed me into becoming a conservative Democrat since 2015-2016. Blue Dog Democrat or whatever.

[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 20 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

So you were fine with decades of hate for minorities and what not, it’s the economy doing shit that you can’t tolerate?

[–] JudahBenHur@lemm.ee 16 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

nice bro, someone announces they're reluctantly coming closer to our camp- attack them! good job

[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 1 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (1 children)

Look I get it, some of you are fine being in bed with the right wing and are happy moving further to right than ever standing for something.

I’m not.

This person did not stop being a conservative. The only motivation they have for not supporting Trump is the economy.

[–] JudahBenHur@lemm.ee 5 points 5 hours ago

maybe. its possible there are other semi-conscious awakenings inside this person as well. cognitive dissonance makes it very, very difficult to admit you were wrong. we can't expect people to do a 180. the people on the right win elections because they run a big tent. I personally believe the left(more-ish) in america loses elections largely due to purity tests.

anyway, its hard to say what's inside someone's head. I say if someone is willing to vote blue for "the economy" they're welcome in the tent. with any luck, the influence of the other people they're no longer knee-jerk hostile to will rub off over time, issue by issue.

[–] Kalon@lemmy.world 19 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

Remember when Republicans seemed concerned with reducing debt? Guess some may still say that but look what's happening with spending now at the same time they are cutting everything, and still looking to increase tax cuts for top earners. 😩

[–] kobra@lemm.ee 12 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

I remember when a democrat balanced the budget and gave the US a surplus from 1998-2001

[–] kibiz0r@midwest.social 2 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

And destroyed the economy as a result.

Public sector growth (federal budget surplus) is private sector atrophy.

You can keep the charade going through risky debt, like mortgage-backed securities. But since there’s no new money entering the economy, those will eventually collapse. And they did.

[–] kobra@lemm.ee 6 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Whatever flaws the Clinton plan had, it was followed by 9/11 and GWB/Obama so I’m not sure how you go back and blame Clinton for that? This feels like blaming Clinton for not having a perfect solution.

[–] kibiz0r@midwest.social 1 points 9 hours ago

I’m not super interested in blame here. Clinton did something dumb. GWB didn’t undo it.

But neither of them invented this obsession with retiring the US debt — which would in fact retire the US dollar.

It’s not the first time we’ve balanced the budget, after all.

History tells the tale. The federal government has achieved fiscal balance (even surpluses) in just seven periods since 1776, bringing in enough revenue to cover all of its spending during 1817-21, 1823-36, 1852-57, 1867-73, 1880-93, 1920-30 and 1998-2001. We have also experienced six depressions. They began in 1819, 1837, 1857, 1873, 1893 and 1929.

Do you see the correlation?

The one exception occurred in the late 1990s and early 2000s, when the dot-com and housing bubbles fueled a consumption binge that delayed the harmful effects of the Clinton surpluses until the Great Recession of 2007-09.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 15 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

Remember when Republicans seemed concerned with reducing debt?

Literally no. Please tell me when this was.

[–] kewjo@lemmy.world 5 points 8 hours ago

every time we had a D president, the concern goes away it's an R in office and then spending goes through the roof.

[–] MagicShel@lemmy.zip 12 points 12 hours ago

They've long said it, but never shown it through actions. Just used it as a cudgel to beat social programs.

[–] ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works 6 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

since 2015-2016

Hah, I would be ecstatic if we had a Romney now instead of what we do have. Or even a McCain. Or hell, even a GWB as long as he wasn't allowed to invade anywhere.

[–] neukenindekeuken@sh.itjust.works 5 points 14 hours ago

Welcome friend. We may not be as cult like as Maga, but at least our representatives are worthless.

[–] Asafum 29 points 14 hours ago

Before the next election: "I declare the Democratic party a terrorist organization!"

Poll "problem" solved. At the rate we're going I really don't doubt this. :/

[–] resipsaloquitur@lemm.ee 16 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Well well well, if it isn’t the consequences of my own actions.

[–] samus12345@lemm.ee 2 points 9 hours ago

This is Trump, he's immune from all consequences.

[–] psycho_driver@lemmy.world 40 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (1 children)

"Blame the economy on Biden"

You mean the metrics showing that under Biden at the end we had one of our strongest economies in our nation's history? Of course, all of the excess wealth was going to the 1%, so average dumb red hat wouldn't have noticed.

Polling is irrelevant now anyway. There won't be another free election anytime soon.

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 24 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Of course, all of the excess wealth was going to the 1%, so average dumb red hat wouldn't have noticed.

Maybe most of it, but certainly not all. Real wages were consistently going up under Biden, especially for the bottom 10% of earners. This isn't as apparent as it should be partially because he did fuck all to combat price gouging.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 7 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

Real wages were consistently going up under Biden

https://www.factcheck.org/2024/06/competing-narratives-on-real-wages-incomes-under-biden/

Real wages were up since the beginning of the pandemic in 2019, but not up since Biden's term began in 2021. If measuring specifically Biden's term, wages did not keep up with inflation. This is complicated by the fact that job losses mostly clustered around lower income workers in the pandemic, so their re-entering the workforce dragged the dataset down.

Basically, it's complicated.

A big problem Democrats had in the election was refusing to acknowledge real problems in the economy, though. They tried to paint a mixed situation as wholly good and told suffering people that they're stupid for believing their lying eyes.

[–] Jaysyn@lemmy.world 21 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Inflation drops precipitously under Biden, gets blamed for inflation.

Make it make sense.

[–] lost_faith@lemmy.ca 2 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

I told you Bidenomics was going to increase inflation. Now, who do you believe, Me, your God, or your lying eyes?

[–] Jaysyn@lemmy.world 4 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

God's not real, so lying eyes, 10 out of 10 times.

[–] lost_faith@lemmy.ca 3 points 13 hours ago

You do not worship me enough, deported

[–] hddsx@lemmy.ca 13 points 14 hours ago

It’s funny that it usually takes a while for policies to take effect, but 45 and 47 have taken actions to make the effect occur in what must be considered instantaneous in government

[–] Today@lemmy.world 11 points 15 hours ago

It usually takes awhile for the new guy's policies to really turn the ship. This time...

[–] Randomgal@lemmy.ca 2 points 12 hours ago

Oh no, he is only supported by 150 million people bow. So sad.

[–] xc2215x@lemmy.world 2 points 13 hours ago

Good for the voters.