grue

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] grue@lemmy.world 1 points 37 minutes ago

I just love how these threads always lead to anti-bike reactionaries coming up with increasingly contrived hypothetical situations to "justify" continuing to cling to their cars like a security blanket.

And then have the audacity to accuse the other side of "prejudice" and lack of "critical thinking skills."

You have to keep in mind that not everyone who lives in a quiet and isolated (even possibly self-sufficient) town is the stereotypical blue-collar farmhand that is commonly displayed by the media.

You have to keep in mind that only a tiny minority of Americans live in tiny and isolated towns at all, and pretending the solution for the vast majority of people doesn't work by pointing to those outliers is bad-faith idiotic bullshit.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 1 points 43 minutes ago

Not everyone lives in cities in the US

But 80% do, so what's your excuse for refusing to solve the problem for the vast majority? The "and even then they are really spread out" is not it, BTW.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 1 points 46 minutes ago (1 children)

I think the guy above you was just talking about regular driving on the freeway, not overlanding in a 4x4.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 4 points 48 minutes ago* (last edited 47 minutes ago)

I've got a cargo e-bike that could handle a 50-mile round trip with a baritone sax just fine.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 5 points 2 hours ago

We cannot wait to stop the traitors.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 6 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

No, it didn't. This whole thing came out of Trump randomly deciding to punish Canada with huge tariffs for no apparent reason* and he made the insinuations against Canada's sovereignty in furtherance of that.

(* actually, to manufacture casus belli)

[–] grue@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago

well, I guess maybe apolitical brainwashed normies aren’t aware.

A.K.A. the majority of people.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago

Haha corn subsidies go brrrrrrrr

[–] grue@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

We'll never be able to fully eliminate entitlement and roadrage

Sure we can, at least in cities. There's no entitled driver road rage if nobody's driving.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago

Hence,

precision comes at a cost

That cost could be needing to use precision robot arms instead of humans, needing to pay higher salaries to find really skilled and diligent humans, or as you suggested, slowing down the assembly line so the workers have time to be more careful.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 2 points 11 hours ago

I used to think "being a millionaire" but that won't even get me a decent house anymore let alone leave me set for life...

All the more reason you (and everybody else) should definitely be setting it as a goal and accomplishing it: you'll be screwed if you don't.

 

cross-posted from: https://rss.ponder.cat/post/116914

He dreamed of a cycling revolution. Then an SUV crushed him

 
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/25870807

Summary

Rep. Rich McCormick (R-GA) faced backlash at a town hall in Roswell, Georgia, over his support for Elon Musk and deep federal budget cuts.

Constituents jeered and booed as McCormick defended layoffs at the CDC, arguing AI makes some jobs redundant.

Attendees criticized the cuts as rushed and extreme, chanting "shame" and accusing him of harming local communities.

The heated event echoed past voter outrage at town halls, with some Republicans avoiding similar meetings after Trump’s first term began in 2017.

 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/25858499

Summary

NYC's congestion pricing program, launched Jan 5 after Biden administration approval, faces new threats from the Trump administration.

Governor Kathy Hochul vows to keep the toll scanners active, deeming Trump's effort and Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy's order an attack on the city.

The MTA swiftly filed a legal complaint to uphold the $9 toll, citing reduced traffic and critical funding for mass transit.

Legal experts warn the Trump administration faces an uphill legal battle.

 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/25804020

https://nitter.net/WhiteHouse/status/1892295984928993698#m

*Nitter mirror. Don't link directly to that shit stain of a site

 
 

TL;DW: as fucking always, it's single-family zoning:

I think instead of making it impossible to build more affordable housing in safer places, and incentivizing people to rebuild in fire-prone areas, maybe the government could do the fucking opposite for once and make it easier to build in places that don't burn down once a decade! The state's response to these neighborhoods going up like kindling cannot only be to replace the kindling just as it was, just where it was, as quickly as possible, and at a taxpayer-funded discount. That is not bravery; that is not resilience; that is denial.

Climate change is only going to make these fires more frequent, and we have a glaringly obvious solution to make California safer in the face of them: we could rezone the city to allow more housing in areas that don't border the fire zone. But that is a solution that our cowardly politicians refuse to try, for fear of pissing off the homeowners who don't like apartment buildings!

 
 

cross-posted from: https://feddit.org/post/6623846

 
view more: next ›