this post was submitted on 07 Mar 2025
310 points (98.1% liked)

politics

21143 readers
3409 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Despite initial support from business leaders, many are expressing concerns about the economic outlook under Trump's second term.

Executives from Ford, GM, ON Semiconductor, Point72, and Citadel have voiced frustration over the uncertainty created by Trump's tariff policies, particularly their unpredictable implementation and exemptions.

Auto industry leaders warn that 25% tariffs on Canada and Mexico would devastate U.S. manufacturing. Other concerns include reduced immigration affecting labor force growth and DOGE's federal workforce cuts.

The White House dismisses the concerns and defends Trump's policies as "pro-growth.”

all 44 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SpaceRanger13@lemm.ee 144 points 2 days ago (1 children)

ONLY because it impacts their bottom line. Not because they think any of his other policies are insane. Not gutting the government healthcare programs, not firing veterans and other federal workers, not his immigration policies, and definitely not the traitor trying to align the US with Russia.

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 110 points 2 days ago (5 children)

That's all completely correct, but --

Isn't it amazing that these "paragons of business" failed to recognize that Little t would be bad for their bottom line in October 2024? Because I sure the fuck did, and I am no "paragon of business."

[–] Xanthobilly@lemmy.world 55 points 2 days ago

Just wait till he starts picking single winners within each industry, and it’s not one of their companies. They’re all so shortsighted. Just like the SCOTUS. What use is a rubber stamp if you’re a totalitarian? None.

[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 11 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I'm starting to think CEOs and the ultra wealthy are fucking idiots who just got lucky.

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Lucky by birth or lucky by happenstance or both.

[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 day ago

I think it takes a certain kind of idiot to want to be obscenely wealthy.

For example: look at Trump and Musk. For all their grifting do they actually seem happy? They are spending so much time and energy on their bullshit when Trump would rather be golfing and Musk would rather be playing video games.
They could both just do that. They have more than enough money to never work another day yet they are desperately trying to increase their Capitalism High Score and have the admiration of the public.

So it takes a certain kind of idiot to have that much wealth and keep working for more, and the world is full of idiots. Some small % of them get lucky and fail their way to success, and people fail to notice the "Survivor's bias" of the whole thing.

[–] Clent@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 day ago

Always has been.

[–] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 13 points 2 days ago (1 children)

this is faux outrage. they dont really care as when the crash hits, they can continue buying up everything at a reduced price.

this is theater to appease rednecks

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 13 points 2 days ago (1 children)

A few will be able to buy up corporate assets from the many who end up being forced to sell low.

[–] phdepressed@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 days ago

They all believe they'll be the few.

[–] Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago

They simply assumed they were exempt or could become exempt for a donation. I still think it's the plan.

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world -1 points 2 days ago (2 children)

The CEOs are ultimately only employees. They do the bidding of the oligarchs and those are OK with overthrowing democracy.

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It's not uncommon for a CEO to be a major (if not primary) shareholder, as well as board chairperson.

They are the oligarchs.

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

Some of them are, but most are not.

[–] RowRowRowYourBot@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Yup CEO’s work for the company. The board of directors are the significant owners in most cases.

[–] apostrofail@lemmy.world 1 points 14 hours ago

CEOs* work for the company

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Thing that was obviously going to happen happened? Remarkable, who could have predicted this

[–] Davin@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

It's like these billionaire CEOs' salaries aren't merit based.

[–] circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org 16 points 1 day ago

Soon we can just start calling it Trump's Recession.

[–] kata1yst@sh.itjust.works 32 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

If only they could have known in advance that the man who constantly screamed that he was going to deport all the migrant workforce, fire most of the federal workforce, and slap tariffs on any country that refused to capitulate to his every whim would hurt the economy!

[–] DarthFrodo@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I wonder if they were just too blinded by greed to act rationally or were under the impression that they can control Trump enough to keep the economy afloat.

[–] rhombus@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago

Probably both. He promised tax cuts for the wealthy, and they thought he’d be easily manipulated like last time. Unfortunately for the rich his Russian handlers want the economy destroyed and they’re the only ones he’s beholden to.

[–] pneumaticFax@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

Maybe just stupid.

[–] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 17 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The tax cuts were made permanent.

People with money don't have to pretend to care anymore.

[–] Drusas@fedia.io 2 points 1 day ago

They will be, but they haven't been made permanent yet.

[–] Yawweee877h444@lemmy.world 32 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Yeah sure, after they all voted for him, and probably love the tax cuts for the rich and corporate entities.

[–] civil_drive@sh.itjust.works 16 points 2 days ago

They want to crash the market so they can buy everything up at a huge discount.

[–] crystalmerchant@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

If anything can get this guy to change his overall tune, it's the money of his broligarchs

[–] toiletobserver@lemmy.world 20 points 2 days ago
[–] Lasherz12@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

These are the same idiots that claim capitalism in America is merit based. This was all obvious long in advance, and they sit here with their surprise Pikachu faces like the rest of the chronically uninformed rubes.

[–] venotic@kbin.melroy.org 22 points 2 days ago

You pricks wanted him too, because you donated to his campaigns. What's wrong? Is he TOO GOOD for you?

[–] MushuChupacabra@lemmy.world 18 points 2 days ago

Why?

Did their smart business sense fail them when they went all in on Trump?

[–] skozzii@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 day ago

Who would have thought chaos is terrible for business.

[–] LuxSpark@lemmy.cafe 14 points 2 days ago

Let's see if they can do anything about it.

[–] salacious_coaster@infosec.pub 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Newsweek could report that the sky was blue, and I'd still look for a second source before believing it.

[–] Gointhefridge@lemm.ee 7 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

This is literally the only thing that could turn the tide on trump. Fuck with people’s money and they will find a way to gut you.

Edit: the people here being the CEOs.

[–] KevinW23@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

That’s just in general too. Once the checks stop coming in, that’s when people will start wanting answers.

[–] zephorah@lemm.ee 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It’s like the man is aging faster, every photo.

[–] Bwoj@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

Wait until you see what the Order 66 incident does to him.

[–] Bonesince1997@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago

Few more personal million dollar donations should do it.

Call me when they're vomiting. Maybe I'll hold their hair back.

[–] eric5949@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

Yet more "dont worry citizens! Someone else will do the hard work for you!" slop from the media.