this post was submitted on 29 Apr 2024
121 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13920 readers
688 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
all 36 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] NewLeaf@hexbear.net 56 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Something something torment nexus.

If only there were a way to link up a bunch of trailers on wheels, but they could have their own road, next to the one for cars. Theoretically, it would only take a couple of people to operate such a vehicle, because the road would have rails. But alas, no such thing exists

[–] moujikman@hexbear.net 21 points 1 year ago

But then a philosopher could operate a switch between two moral dilemmas, do you really want /that/ reality.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 18 points 1 year ago

Nope sorry that's impossible.

Instead the roads will be filled with hallucinating death machines.

[–] InevitableSwing@hexbear.net 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Something something torment nexus.

Or

Torment Nexus - Keep on Truckin' Edition

---

Edit

Or

Torment Nexus Mobile

[–] PorkrollPosadist@hexbear.net 41 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] Awoo@hexbear.net 31 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

2014: "By next year we will have fully autonomous driving"

2015: "By next year we will have fully autonomous driving"

2016: "By next year we will have fully autonomous driving"

2017: "By next year we will have fully autonomous driving"

...

2024: "Within 3 or 4 years we will have fully autonomous driving"

[–] moujikman@hexbear.net 22 points 1 year ago

With no accountability, accidents become a social cost, which the government is ultimately responsible for. Inaction is negligence.

[–] chickentendrils@hexbear.net 21 points 1 year ago (1 children)

With how strange reality's been lately I could see this being the Skynet we actually get.

Think you can just nuke them while they recharge on commandeered solar? Good luck, they've dogpiled the silo magic-conch-shell

[–] Llituro@hexbear.net 18 points 1 year ago

roads rendered occasionally inoperable by roving bands of unmanned semitrucks that got disconnected from the hivemind rocketing around?

[–] JoeByeThen@hexbear.net 18 points 1 year ago (3 children)

There was a company that was already running automated semis between exits iirc. They did a deal with Budweiser at one point.

Google says it was Otto.

https://money.cnn.com/2016/10/25/technology/otto-budweiser-self-driving-truck/index.html

There was also a competitor that intended to use remote drivers for the complicated parts of the trips. I'm sure that'll go well.

[–] buckykat@hexbear.net 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There was also a competitor that intended to use remote drivers for the complicated parts of the trips. I'm sure that'll go well.

Genius, it's not like the complicated parts tend to be mountainous with poor connectivity or anything.

[–] CyberSyndicalist@hexbear.net 12 points 1 year ago

this is a terrible idea even in ideal conditions, anyone who's played a videogame can tell you that it's easy to crash driving with wireless latency.

[–] EmmaGoldman@hexbear.net 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Self driving trucks but they have to be escorted by someone in a car, but that's cheaper because they don't have to have a CDL, and you innovate by connecting multiple trailers onto the truck in a row so you basically have Uber drivers piloting Australian road trains.

[–] context@hexbear.net 10 points 1 year ago

the car is also self-driving, there's only one person in the car and they're expected to take over the self-driving car and the self-driving truck if needed because hey, what are the odds that both self-driving features will fail at the same time?

[–] Hestia@hexbear.net 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Remote drivers seem even worse than an AI would be. Imagine is the internet connection is spotty.

[–] JoeByeThen@hexbear.net 1 points 1 year ago

But think of the savings! Lol.

[–] GrouchyGrouse@hexbear.net 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There's a Stephen King short story about all the trucks "waking up" and going on killing sprees. It's called... wait for it...

spoilerTrucks

[–] combat_brandonism@hexbear.net 8 points 1 year ago

lmao Hollywood really picking up his editors' slack renaming that Maximum Overdrive

[–] CloutAtlas@hexbear.net 14 points 1 year ago

Fast & the Furious 1 type situation where they open the back of these trucks on a highway to loot the valuable Blu-ray players inside with no resistance from the AI.

[–] keepcarrot@hexbear.net 12 points 1 year ago

One might have thought self driving trains would have been an easier project

[–] D61@hexbear.net 11 points 1 year ago

Within three or four years,...

Next year it will be "three or four years" too.

[–] Bartsbigbugbag@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

If they were using Chinese tech, I’d honestly trust it a lot more. Their self driving is so far ahead of anything else I’ve seen.

[–] wtypstanaccount04@hexbear.net 12 points 1 year ago

Nah I wouldn't even trust Chinese tech to do this. You shouldn't be automating semi trucks, full stop.

[–] POKEMONGOTOTHEGULAG@hexbear.net 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Thordros@hexbear.net 14 points 1 year ago

He's been too distracted with all the good news Governor Noem has been publishing about her dogs.

[–] tactical_trans_karen@hexbear.net 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The year is 2030, burgerlanders are rarely seen on the roads. Roving gangs of autonomous trucks rampage about any paved roadway and crush anything that the AI recognizes as organic. The people hide in fear when convoys come to town to deliver their treats, quickly gather them when they are dispensed, and scatter like cockroaches in the light. In their hovels, they cherish the fine quality wares from China, and quietly coo to themselves "thank you Jeff Bezos, thank you Ronald Reagan, thank you John Wayne... thank you for our... freedoms". agony-deep

[–] coffeejoe@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 year ago

They should keep the self driving portions of any road vehicle physically separate from any remotely accessible portion. We don’t need to make giant r/c cars and trucks a normal thing all over the place. Imagine them moving as a swarm. That’s a lot of power with too little oversight.

[–] tombruzzo@hexbear.net 4 points 1 year ago

Simpsons did it

it's called a train

[–] Assian_Candor@hexbear.net 1 points 1 year ago