this post was submitted on 25 Jul 2025
194 points (94.9% liked)

News

31365 readers
3046 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Raiderkev@lemmy.world 10 points 6 days ago

Curious who's gonna regulate it after they knee capped the FDA

[–] Deflated0ne@lemmy.world 5 points 6 days ago

I'm ready for that psycho to die. I don't care how he goes. But he does need to go. Go on down to the lower room. Where his drug addled cracked out demented ass belongs.

[–] lemmyng@piefed.ca 123 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 28 points 1 week ago

His "point" is that food dyes cause cancer, hyperactivity, and autism. It's a great horror story I'm sure. Not really a point.

[–] overthere@lemmy.dbzer0.com 55 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Stopped clock. Hell, even a backwards running clock is right ever so often.

[–] fartographer@lemmy.world 23 points 1 week ago (2 children)

... A backwards-running clock is right more often... Unless I'm misreading what you meant.

[–] cattywampas@midwest.social 16 points 1 week ago (3 children)

You're not misreading but you are thinking too much about the analogy.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Tedesche@lemmy.world 52 points 1 week ago (9 children)

For those interested in the actual science part of the article:

Why the fuss over food coloring? Are natural dyes really that much better for our health?

“They’re better for some people’s health,” says Jamie Alan, a professor of pharmacology and toxicology at Michigan State University. “There is a very small percentage of children who are very sensitive to these dyes. And when they eat these dyes, they display behaviors that we sometimes associate with ADHD.”

Alan stresses that there is no evidence that those kids actually develop ADHD. But research has found that after eating foods containing certain dyes, children, including those diagnosed with ADHD or autism, can show signs of hyperactivity, moodiness and inattentiveness. However many of these foods, particularly candy and soda, also contain sugar, which has also been connected to hyperactive behavior.

Alan recommends that parents talk to a pediatrician and try an elimination diet to make sure the dye and not another ingredient is to blame. But she largely supports phasing out artificial dyes; most public health advocates think this is a good idea. “In my opinion,” Alan says, “because we’re talking about children and because they are a vulnerable population, I do think this is a great thing to do. But I will recognize that it is not going to impact the vast majority of the population.”

None of this changes the fact that Robert F. Kennedy is a fucking moron.

Agreed. I wonder if he came up with this himself or someone from his team. There are plenty papers that cautiously correlate said dyes with abnormal brain functioning.

And my personal opinion, there isn't any reason for such dyes to exist in food. Candy or soda shouldn't have to look like "Demon Core Green"

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 39 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] Shanedino@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago

I hate dyes because they are a form of advertisement.

[–] QuarterSwede@lemmy.world 22 points 1 week ago (28 children)

The answer is yes. Everyone around me thinks the crap they allow in our food is bad for us. Europeans done have the same issues we do with food because they’re much more regulated.

load more comments (28 replies)
[–] bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

All a distraction. Yes some of these ideas aren't bad. We don't need this fuckhead to implement them.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Flagg76@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago (3 children)

RFK JR actually says something intelligent... That's something I never thought I would experience.

[–] ATS1312@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

I'm ready to make him fight for this, even as I agree with him that those chemicals are an issue. Just not the issue he thinks they are.

The more time he sinks into this, the less he has to throw disabled people off of bridges.

The dyes must be harmful to the worms

[–] smeenz@lemmy.nz 2 points 6 days ago

I'm sure it wasn't intentional

[–] gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de 13 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

This reminds me of the study that said that people drive more colorful cars in times when the economic outlooks are better.

So, the colorfulness expresses their character and their outlook towards a positive future.

A colleague told me of a similar study that related shorter skirt lengths on women to better economic outlooks.

[–] Asswardbackaddict@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Let's fix this society, if only for shorter skirts.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 11 points 1 week ago

I want a roadkill-eating, worm-brained psychopathic junkie out of my food, can I have that?

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

Only decades after other countries kicked them out. Some of those common American food dyes are illegal even in China, of all places.

[–] Skyrmir@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

We can't get labels that say what's actually in our food, and chuckle fuck thinks he's gonna ban food coloring.

[–] xep@fedia.io 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Why not disallow all food dye, not just the bright ones?

[–] pennomi@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Beet juice is a bright dye, but it’s also a food. Some dyes are entirely harmless. I believe the rule they’re talking about affects artificial dyes, not bright dyes, and the headline is mistaken.

For example, some red dyes are sourced from petroleum instead of edible substances.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] coyootje@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I mean, the fact that there is stuff for sale in the US with the label saying "scientists in California have proven this causes cancer" is proof enough that even a crazy nutter like RFK can be sometimes right.

[–] AmidFuror@fedia.io 10 points 1 week ago

Is this comment about the Prop 65 warnings? Prop 65 is useless, because the dose is the poison and it says nothing about that. Putting warnings up almost everywhere means people will (and often should) ignore them.

[–] gloog@fedia.io 10 points 1 week ago

The Prop 65 warning is on so many things because it's way cheaper to put the label on everything, regardless of whether it's technically true or not, than it is to run the tests to prove that the specific substances called out are not present.

load more comments
view more: next ›