this post was submitted on 15 Jul 2025
842 points (95.8% liked)

Political Memes

8906 readers
2936 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Kevo@lemmy.world 16 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Does anybody have sources around this stat? I fully believe it, but I'd like to have references to point to for myself in the future

[–] cygnus@lemmy.ca 16 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] Kevo@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Oh good to know i just don't know how to read

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Bytemeister@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago (11 children)

Resources aren't evenly distributed naturally, some area may not have enough resources.

It takes more resources to get more resources, we may be measuring 30% of total resources, but not 30% of resource capacity.

I'm fine with population control, but it should be implemented willingly at an individual level, and pushed via education and community acceptance. I catch a small amount of flak for not having kids, but wife catches a lot more.

[–] AlteredEgo@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 days ago

Not sure what you're trying to say, but the paper assumes current population trends and means 30% of currently available resources in 2025 would be enough to give everyone a decent living standard (DLS) in 2050. We have everything we need to do this right now.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml 8 points 2 days ago

It's over, I've made you into the Adidas tracksuit wojak and me into the cute nonbinary vibes wojak

[–] Jhogenbaum@leminal.space 4 points 2 days ago

It is definitely possible a "decent" living standard is lower in their minds then mine or yours or ours. I am very curious

[–] hedge_lord@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

No u don't understand I need to be mean to others it's just how it is I don't make the rules. Wanting the best for everyone and working to achieve that is when it's Not Realistic and the more you are not finding excuses to hurt others the more Not Realistic it is. Hope this helps

[–] nandeEbisu@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

How do we know who to give food to of people aren't competing against each other to hoard as much wealth as they can?

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Earlobe to bellybutton depth ratio. If the number is odd, you get tacos. If it's even, you get tacos. Other options also available.

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

[screaming in inefficiency]

Multiple things can be true at once.

I think that humanity only optimized for quantity of life, not quality of life in the last 200 years. That doesn't really make sense. All of our needs can be fulfilled with 30% of the current workforce.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›