this post was submitted on 18 Jun 2025
300 points (95.2% liked)

Technology

71955 readers
3485 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

As we roll out more generative AI and agents, it should change the way our work is done

we expect that this will reduce our total corporate workforce

Are we done for?

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

Time to head for greener pastures.

[–] Zwuzelmaus@feddit.org 119 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

Oh, gimme a break.

This jerk is telling his workers that all their jobs are in jeopardy all the time, year after year. No news here. It's just his thing.

Probably he's trying to keep up the fear - booo hooooo...

Seriously, there's a reason there's been horror stories of people crying at their desks at Amazon since the early 2000's. Because they've always treated everyone like they're completely expendable at all times. Horrific work culture.

[–] sexy_peach@feddit.org 8 points 1 week ago

Exactly this. And their jobs might actually be in jeopardy if their colleagues start working twice as hard. Product will reflect this though

[–] obinice@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (3 children)

But why? Why make them scared they'll lose their jobs at any moment Vs feeling secure?

If they're scared, they'll be seeking better employment, applying for other jobs whilst working this highly unstable one. Probably reduced productivity too, I wouldn't be as productive under that sort of negative environment.

Make them feel valued and secure though and they won't leave, there'll be less workplace issues for you to have to deal with, and they'll work harder.

Unless you see them as completely disposable because the law won't touch you and there will always be desperate people to fill those positions at any given time, fear is a ridiculous thing to want to instill in your workforce.

[–] Zwuzelmaus@feddit.org 10 points 1 week ago

But why? Why make them scared they'll lose their jobs

Overly bossy bosses often believe that people work more, or perform better this way.

It's abuser tactics - "You're lucky you've got me, no-one else would have you, now take more shit." It's cheaper than making employees feel happy and valued. And yeah, some very successful companies absolutely see their employees as disposable. I'm hoping this'll become a problem for them when they've burned through the available pool of vulnerable staff, but we don't seem to be there yet.

[–] oh_@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

That’s Amazon and many other big tech company cultures. Hostile hustle culture. You could always lose your job as you need to be a “top performer” to stay. They purposely let the “lowest performers” go on a regular basis.

[–] criss_cross@lemmy.world 58 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

No. Amazon has been trying to cut head count for years now. They were hoping RTO5 would do the trick but because every company is trying to do the same thing people didn’t have a ship to jump to.

“Our AI is so great!” Is a way to mask that their finances aren’t good and they dramatically made the wrong bet in 2021 hiring so much.

Honestly most of the time at Amazon you’re doing more meetings and red tape than you are coding so I don’t expect AI to magically fix shit for them.

[–] flamingo_pinyata@sopuli.xyz 17 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Their shopping experience is so much worse than only 3 years ago. Whatever they are doing, they are doing it wrong.

[–] atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 week ago

Amazon is a technology company now. For a long time the storefront and logistics have been a tech demo for Amazon Web Services.

For instance: FreeRTOS

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Zenith@lemm.ee 3 points 1 week ago (3 children)

They’re actually significantly below their current hiring target at the executive level and people are leaving left and right.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] anachrohack@lemmy.world 37 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The people who are predicting that AI will replace X% of jobs are usually not qualified to make that determination. They don't do those jobs, and they don't have any idea what is involved in those peoples jobs. They are way too high up the corporate ladder to have actually been doing any real work in the last 10 years. They were sold some AI product which promises to lay off thousands of workers, and they seem to have believed it implicitly.

What's sickening to me is how enthusiastic they seem to be about ruining their employees lives

[–] lando55@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

Ironically, save for specific positions that require facetime and political shrewdness, it is these same prognosticators whose roles can most readily be fulfilled by Ai

[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 34 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It takes a special type of shithead to threaten peoples' jobs to their face without even knowing what the fuck they are talking about.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmings.world 10 points 1 week ago

This is going to be the threat that EVERY employee will hear over the next several years, whenever they ask for any sort of a raise, promotion, etc. "Just be glad we don't replace you with AI."

[–] SparrowHawk@feddit.it 27 points 1 week ago (2 children)

yes, create a legion of angry, unemployed/unemployable people, that will go well for the capitalist system

[–] atlien51@lemm.ee 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Don’t worry, they’ve got the army + police at their feet to keep people in line!

~~unless the public are well organized~~

[–] SparrowHawk@feddit.it 6 points 1 week ago

unemployed = more free time to organize!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] KoboldCoterie@pawb.social 24 points 1 week ago

Nice of him to give them the heads up, so they can all go find new jobs now. Sure would be poetic if they all just moved elsewhere and left Amazon understaffed.

[–] Feyd@programming.dev 22 points 1 week ago

Can we quit posting this baseless fear mongering? It is simply powerful people trying to demoralize workers and acting like it is legitimate news is playing into their hands.

[–] Kowowow@lemmy.ca 19 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Something I think should be on the same level as "if buying isn't owning piracy isn't theft" is something like "if an ai/robot can take my job why should I have to work"

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Cocodapuf@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Time for the AI teams to suddenly have tech issues.

"Sorry, the whole codebase is just gone! We have no idea what happened!"

"Must have been the S3 storage"

[–] qyron@sopuli.xyz 11 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Stupid question but what is stopping the software engineers to poison the well?

Insert malicious code, self destructing functions, have entire batches of code lost or corrupted, hardware damaged, etc?

[–] baatliwala@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

A company with fuck off amount of legal power?

[–] qyron@sopuli.xyz 5 points 1 week ago

Small acts of sabotage are easy to write off to causality, if well planned.

[–] Regrettable_incident@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

It's not a stupid question. From what I hear, people try stuff like this all the time, stuff like putting a bit of code on your employer's system that'll erase important files if you get shit canned and no longer appear on the payroll. It's why a lot of companies no longer give notice when ppl are fired, just have security walk them out. And unfortunately this stuff is often traceable, which means they're risking quite serious prosecution.

I don't like much of what I see, I think it's becoming clear that some new tech is going to have wide ranging and harmful effects. I'm not sure that doing luddite stuff will help but I can understand why people would think that way.

[–] qyron@sopuli.xyz 6 points 1 week ago

We could just regulate tech companies and outright ban some practices but since we apparently don't have time for rational solutions...

Well thought out sabotage can be written off to causality or involuntary human error.

Not giving notice of lay off is an abusive work practice and only shows how far we've allowed work conditions to degrade.

And that practice itself can be highly dangerous, if we consider a person can be midway into a complex task that can turn extremely difficult to follow by another: waste of time, resources, energy and money.

[–] pinball_wizard@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 week ago

Stupid question but what is stopping the software engineers to poison the well?

Great question. I agree with other responses - it happens, and there's motive to hush it up, so we tend not to hear about it.

It's also just really hard to tell the difference after the fact between "Dave sabotaged us" and "no one knows how to do what Dave did".

But I'll add - there's currently little need motive sabotage AI implementations. Current generation AI is largely unable to deliver on what is promised, in a business sense. It does cool but useless things, like quickly generating low maturity code, and writing a summary any seven year old could have wtitten.

Current generation AI adds very little business value, while creating substantial risks. Nevermind that no one knows how Dave worked, now no one knows how our AI works, and it's so eager to please everyone that it lies at critical moments.

Companies playing around with current generation AI to boost next quarter's stocks will hit plenty of "find out" soon enough, with nothing beyond the natural consequences of ignoring their own engineers advice.

All that to say - if we see what looks like sabotage, it may well just be the natural consequences of stupidity.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] orca@orcas.enjoying.yachts 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Corporate goons always use fear as a tool. This coupled with fucking up the entire tech industry via layoffs, and suddenly engineer leverage basically flies out the window entirely. You can’t replace senior devs with AI. You can try and I will enjoy watching you fail.

[–] Feyd@programming.dev 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You can't even replace junior devs with AI. This is a completely false narrative intended to demoralize workers into not exercising their market power.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] vane@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Ah yes those famous "Agents". They will of course write themselves, adapt themselves to changing environment and run on their own without any supervision.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] andallthat@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago

Quick recap for future historians:

  • for a really brief part of its history, humanity tried to give kindness a go. A half-hearted attempt at best, but there were things like DEI programs, for instance, attempting to create a gentler, more accepting world for everyone. At the very least, trying to appear human to the people they managed was seen as a good attribute for Leaders.

  • some people felt that their God-given right to be assholes to everyone was being taken away (it's right there in the Bible: be a jerk to your neighbor, take away his job and f##k his wife)

  • Assholes came back in full force, with a vengeance. Not that they had ever disappeared, but now they relished the opportunity to be openly mean for no reason again. Once again, True Leaders were judged by their ability to drain every drop of blood from their employees and take their still-beating hearts as an offering to the Almighty Shareholders.

[–] Zenith@lemm.ee 10 points 1 week ago

Amazon is currently hemorrhaging executive level and above engineers. Amazon will have to be replacing these jobs with AI cause every one of value has already left/is leaving and filling those jobs with qualified people at that level is actually a lot more difficult than more junior level positions.

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 9 points 1 week ago

Exactly what a good leader would tell their team to motivate them. /s

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

Well that’s just good, quality managing right there.

[–] DancingBear@midwest.social 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Out of all the jobs, the bosses job is the most replaceable

load more comments (1 replies)

if you don't boycott Amazon by now it's time to start. Don't buy from them don't work for them. Let them rot in the dark.

[–] alehel@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I get the feeling that simply working at Amazon means your job is at risk.

[–] ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 week ago

That's pretty much how it goes yeah lol

[–] Spacehooks@reddthat.com 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

How kind of him to tell his staff to look elsewhere for jobs so far in advance. Polish that resume team!

[–] themaninblack@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yes, a few times before I have thought, “what possible good can come from this?” In response to utterances by petty, nervous tyrannical managers.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MyOpinion@lemmy.today 5 points 1 week ago

Got to keep them scared.

[–] barneypiccolo@lemm.ee 5 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Between AI and Robotics, we will likely have a permanently unemployed segment of close to 50%, or even more, within the next decade.

Not everyone will be able to be retrained to be a robotics engineer or AI programmer, and many, many jobs that are considered entry-level will disappear. Imagine a world where most fast food and retail workers are unemployed.

When 40% of America is unemployed, the government will be faced with 2 options - Universal Basic Income, or reducing the population by 40%. Which solution will each party embrace, and how will they accomplish their objectives?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] ThePantser@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Can't wait for all the random deals on things when the AI randomly cuts prices of things or ships me pallets of things.

Edit: Things!

Did someone tell Amazon that some of the staff they will let go will have access to AI as well and will turn around and start competing with them? Someone should as AI is not just for corporations. In fact it is and may continue to benefit individuals and small teams more.

load more comments
view more: next ›