SleafordMod

joined 3 months ago
[–] SleafordMod@feddit.uk 1 points 11 hours ago

Fair points. Also I guess practically big companies like Apple would never allow a situation where their encryption is compromised while encryption on smaller platforms like Signal isn't. Apple etc would spend billions lobbying so such a situation never happens.

[–] SleafordMod@feddit.uk 2 points 14 hours ago

I like the deadpan style. Yeah he's had quite a few TV shows. If people keep offering you work and you find the work pretty straightforward and you get paid, why not take it, I guess.

[–] SleafordMod@feddit.uk 3 points 15 hours ago

HMD are Finnish. I think their phones are assembled in China but that's the case for many smartphones (e.g. iPhones).

However I noticed that some HMD phones use Unisoc CPUs, and Unisoc are Chinese. I don't know how much that matters. Other HMD phones use Qualcomm CPUs - Qualcomm are American.

[–] SleafordMod@feddit.uk 3 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

I think Romesh is alright. I liked the travel shows he did for the BBC.

[–] SleafordMod@feddit.uk 1 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

Maybe only the biggest companies should be required to be able to decrypt certain messages if a court warrant is produced. Privacy fans could use services exempt from this requirement, like Signal. But there are laypeople who just use iMessage because it's the default, and you could catch criminals sending bad stuff over iMessage.

I think there are valid concerns on both sides of the argument... but I am just imagining if you have a group of violent people planning an attack over iMessage, I want law enforcement to be able to read those messages.

[–] SleafordMod@feddit.uk 1 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

I don't want end-to-end encryption entirely outlawed. But for the biggest platforms from massive corporations, maybe those corporations could keep their encryption keys stored with high security somewhere, so they can decrypt particular messages if a court warrant is issued.

People who are uneasy about that could go to a more privacy-focused platform like Signal. Some criminals would do that too, but at least something would be done to catch criminals on the popular platforms.

[–] SleafordMod@feddit.uk 1 points 16 hours ago

I'm not comparing privacy fans to paedophiles and terrorists, that's not what I mean. What I mean is that I want serious criminals to be caught.

I think properly private technology is good to protect yourself from an authoritarian government for example. You could use something like Signal for messaging (I've not used it, but apparently it's good).

But the big popular platforms like WhatsApp and iMessage, which many laypeople use just because they're popular - on those platforms I think it makes sense for law enforcement to be able to access messages, but only in certain circumstances. So maybe Apple could keep the encryption key and they could decrypt someone's messages if a court warrant is issued.

I'm not saying end-to-end encryption should be entirely outlawed. Hopefully services like Signal would still exist. Sure, some criminals might jump to those platforms, but you could still catch some at least, who use big services like iMessage.

[–] SleafordMod@feddit.uk 1 points 16 hours ago

Maybe they're smart enough to choose someone who is either British or who has a flawless British accent.

But I do bet they'll start doing spin off TV shows on Amazon Prime, like Disney has done with Star Wars. If it helps them milk the franchise for more money then surely they'd do it.

[–] SleafordMod@feddit.uk 1 points 16 hours ago

Fair enough. I guess I could possibly forgive an American actor as long as they can do an extremely good British accent. If the accent sounds at all American I will be annoyed.

I thought Pierce Brosnan was good as Bond and his accent was fine (he's Irish of course - I don't think he has British citizenship).

[–] SleafordMod@feddit.uk 2 points 16 hours ago

The outrage from certain sections of the public would be pretty huge. According to them, Bond must always be white and male.

[–] SleafordMod@feddit.uk 1 points 16 hours ago

I wasn't meaning to criticise any particular country, I just meant that goals aren't inherently a good thing.

Regarding China and the US, I think both countries have a lot to offer, and there will be decent people from each country, but I don't think I'm a fan of the current government of either country.

[–] SleafordMod@feddit.uk 1 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

No I haven't, in fact I think I only know one song by them... good song though (Jobseeker). I should probably check out more of their stuff.

I just chose this username because I was trying to think of something randomly and it popped into my head.

 

Who would be your pick for the next James Bond?

 

Greg Kroah-Hartman... urged fellow contributors to embrace those interested in contributing Rust code to improve the kernel.

"Adding another language really shouldn't be a problem... embrace the people offering to join us

Thoughts on this?

 

Source is here: https://yougov.co.uk/topics/politics/survey-results/daily/2025/02/20/c33bd/1

That source allows you to see the results according to political affiliation. Pluralities of supporters of the Conservatives, Labour, and Lib Dems think that supporting Ukraine is more important.

The exception is Reform UK, whose supporters think that good relations with the USA are more important than supporting Ukraine.

 

The Guardian says: "Foreign secretary’s speech comes as UK continues to tread fine diplomatic line between supporting Ukraine and not offending Trump"

Maybe the UK should just offend Trump

 
 

Do you think the UK should seek ties with Europe instead of with the US?

 

Do you think it's good that SpaceX might end up facing competition?

 

I have considered this drug in the past but I thought the expense and the side effects would make it not worth it. Looks like maybe it is indeed not worth it, given how bad the side effects can be.

 

This quote is a good summary of the article:

It is time to rebuild meaningful working and trading relations with Europe. This does not have to mean rejoining the EU. But it does mean recognising where our security and our prosperity both lie.

Thoughts?

 

Do you think the press is too critical of Keir Starmer?

 

Should we try to bolster our friendship with Europe?

The author claims that the UK government "must unambiguously launch talks on a big, expansive trade deal with the EU coupled with a deal on European defence".

Do you agree?

 

I read this story and thought it was interesting. Essentially it's saying that Zuck's recent changes to Meta moderation are almost certainly a response to Republican pressure, despite what Zuck claims.

I noticed that they disabled the comments on this story, while most stories have comments enabled. I guess they don't want a lot of angry comments from Trump supporters.

view more: next ›