this post was submitted on 05 Jun 2025
242 points (96.2% liked)

Microblog Memes

7939 readers
2976 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 37 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] JacksonLamb@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

Ours is better.

[–] cm0002@lemmy.world 89 points 2 days ago (2 children)

It's not nearly as good as the 0G. This one's just a common social media "Hot girl sliding into your DMs" account

[–] M137@lemmy.world 18 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Why did you write OG with a zero?

[–] Black616Angel@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 23 hours ago

She just has zero gravitas.

[–] HeurtisticAlgorithm9@feddit.uk 23 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Where else would you start your indices?

[–] lime@feddit.nu 2 points 2 days ago (2 children)

0 is for array offsets. 1 is for lists.

[–] Mandrilleren@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It's actually always been 0G. It means zero gravity because it's so original it was there before earth formed to make a gravity well.

Over time people just confused the term.

[–] underline960@sh.itjust.works -3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Why would you lie on the internet like that?

OG stands for Original Gangster.

[–] Mandrilleren@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It was an attempt at a joke.

I thought the ridiculousness of the claim would make it obvious.

[–] underline960@sh.itjust.works 12 points 2 days ago (2 children)

You would think. We have people in 2025 who think this is real:

[–] misterdoctor@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago

Cute little man with a job, bless him

[–] JandroDelSol@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago

man, if he was real and delivered mail to me, I think that would fix me

I don’t know how that works. If a woman slid into my DMs at all, let alone one in a bikini, I’d immediately dismiss it as spam.

Women don’t hit on men often, and they certainly don’t do it on the internet.

Then again, people fell for Nigerian Prince scams so I guess I’m just more wary prey.

[–] myrrh@ttrpg.network 6 points 1 day ago

...now that's a name i've not heard in - two months...

[–] serfraser@sopuli.xyz 41 points 2 days ago
[–] fushuan@lemm.ee 55 points 2 days ago

A mere imitation

[–] Moose@moose.best 15 points 1 day ago

Some person named Lily is going to be very disapointed in the future if they want a username with their name in it. What do you mean they're all taken?!?

[–] thanksforallthefish@literature.cafe 32 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Did anyone ever find out what "Nicole" etc actually wanted ? I just blocked and immediately reported spam, but tbh never actually ask what flavour of scam "she" was up to

[–] vaguerant@fedia.io 77 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Eventually the messages started coming with crypto addresses to help her with her sick dad and college tuition.

Ahh, yeah ok, not too surprising I guess. Thanks

[–] Mothra@mander.xyz 24 points 2 days ago (1 children)

No. No more Nicole spam after they locked the Nicole community. Because someone thought it would be funny to spam photos of a corpse.

[–] captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

As hard as they shut down discussions of "Nicole" I'm surprised simply saying the name doesn't get your account banned.

[–] Mothra@mander.xyz 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm surprised shutting down the community stopped the messages. I never thought that would work

[–] captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

sh.itjust.works clamped the spam filter down so hard that there was awhile there where I couldn't access the nicoled@feddit.org community from my account, I had to go separately. So somebody might still be trying and it's getting nuked server side.

It was such a weird scam, too.

[–] Mothra@mander.xyz 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Oh that's interesting. But the senders were from a variety of instances

Yeah I think the sh.itjust.works admins blocked it pretty hard from showing up to internal accounts. Other folks from other instances could send, but us sh.itheads couldn't receive. And they did their brain surgery with a backhoe.

[–] ddash@lemmy.dbzer0.com 25 points 2 days ago

Oh no. She's hot.

[–] TheBat@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

Oh that's a battalilyon

[–] AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space -2 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Isn’t Bluesky spam all the way down?

[–] clang@lemmy.zip 1 points 12 hours ago

I’ve got about 600 followers. I think about 525 of them are just bots.

Pretty poorly executed bots too if you ask me. Every one has a profile pic of a cute girl, always exactly two posts, and they’re following somewhere between 1.5k and 15k accounts.

[–] TheBat@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago

Not for me tbh. I followed some people and algorithm seems to curate my feed accordingly. It's mostly cats and climate news.

[–] morphballganon@lemmynsfw.com 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

There's some good stuff but you gotta block like 1000 profiles to have a decent feed

[–] ProgrammingSocks@pawb.social 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The opposite works better. Follow the accounts you actually like and just use the following tab.

[–] morphballganon@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 1 day ago

Tried that, a little too repetitive for my taste

[–] pero@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 days ago

Yeahh, a lot of posts what end up on the frontpage get at least a few copy paste comments

I honestly expected bsky would be better with spam protection than twitter, but hey, at least its not dicks and uncensored porn as it was on twitter