this post was submitted on 08 May 2025
464 points (98.5% liked)

politics

23420 readers
2699 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Trump's officials are quietly concerned about his "blatant criminal behavior." What took them so long?

It is time to stop examining the chaos and time to do something about it.

I have a source inside the Trump regime who feels, in their own words, “a little disillusioned.” This person says they signed on to the Trump team because of “DEI going too far” and because “woke culture was dividing the country,” but is now concerned about the “blatant criminal behavior” of Donald Trump. Really? His last administration didn’t show you that? Well, OK.

This source first approached me by saying, “I can provide you bonafides to show you I’m serious.” That impressed me because I didn’t think many people inside the Trump regime knew what bonafides were, let alone how to be serious.

This source’s concerns about Trump are indeed legitimate, and deserve to be heard. “Not all of us are buying everything he says,” this person told me. “We understand the problem, but we see no solution. You guys in the press, with very few exceptions, are not trustworthy. Congress can’t be trusted and the judiciary so far hasn’t been able to stop him.”

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] dryfter@lemm.ee 34 points 2 days ago

Someone has got to start talking about “inclusion” instead of division

images

[–] Taleya@aussie.zone 2 points 1 day ago

The drunks are sobering up and looking at the mess they have to clean up

[–] ReallyActuallyFrankenstein@lemmynsfw.com 98 points 2 days ago (12 children)

So what about the Democrats, I asked? “They hate us and won’t accept us. And if they don’t change their attitude, Trump and MAGA will keep winning.”

That was echoed by former Republican congressman Joe Walsh, who regularly speaks out about this. “If there’s not room for center-right former Republicans in today’s Democratic Party, then today’s Republican Party will remain victorious and our democracy will disappear,” Walsh told me.

Most of us will accept you. Just stop being awful people. It isn't hard.

[–] meeeeetch@lemmy.world 63 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

If there’s not room for center-right former Republicans in today’s Democratic Party...

My man, there was room for hard-right current Republicans Liz Cheney and Dick Cheney. You know what their support brought to the ticket last November? Two votes in Wyoming.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Gregg@lemm.ee 51 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

“Center right?” Spare me. He was MAGA through and through until 2.0 took hold. This language is explicitly used to reinforce the Overton Window further to the right while still whining that the “left” is mean. Dems are already corporate as fuck and would rather eat their own left of center than fight against full corporate control of the federal government. Simply caring/pretending to care in some cases about minority groups Republicans ostracize is a bridge too far for poor, wayward souls like Joe Walsh. Fuck off.

[–] billiam0202@lemmy.world 40 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Here's the problem.

Strip Trump and MAGA from the GOP, and what are you left with?

The same shit-ass party that brought us Trump, only less emboldened.

They still want tax cuts for billionaires, no universal health care, no workers rights, no mention about climate change, no rights for LGBTQ people, no women's rights, no non-white people in America.

Etc.

The only difference between "the party of Reagan" and MAGA is that under Reagan the GOP was much quieter about being assholes.

You know how the US and the USSR were allied against Germany, but the second WWII was over they started pointing their guns at each other? That's where I feel like we're at now with "center-right" Republicans like Walsh. Sure, I'll take the help of anyone who recognizes that Trump is a threat to democracy and the ideals of the US, but the second that's dealt with there's gonna be problems.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] athairmor@lemmy.world 24 points 2 days ago

Yeah, they can fuck off with “just lean right, everybody and we’ll be OK.” They can go form a new party with Slotkin.

This anonymous source sounds like they’re part of the movement of Slotkin and others to make the Democratic Party more palatable to Republicans with buyer’s remorse.

How about, instead, those Republicans stand down and let the Republican Party burn. Without so-called “centrist” support and enabling, Trump won’t take the country down with him.

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 27 points 2 days ago

Everyone who still has an R by their name is a fascist.

[–] DrFistington@lemmy.world 22 points 2 days ago

They hate you because you're evil shit bags whose policies hurt children, family's, and Americans across all socioeconomic spectrums except the top 1%. You're actively sabotaging the stability of our economy, global influence, safety, and way of life.

[–] MolecularCactus1324@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago

But also, no. I don’t think Democrats need to be this center right party. Go fix the Republican Party rather than displacing democrats.

[–] ExtantHuman@lemm.ee 12 points 2 days ago

They realize they can opose then from with their own party, right?

This is just an excuse to avoid changing their own behavior

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] yarr 9 points 1 day ago (2 children)

He didn't save the world the first time (despite promising he would drain the swamp within days) so why would anyone think he would do it the second time?

[–] CheeseToastie@lazysoci.al 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I know. But they love him. Kamala didn't inspire enough people to vote Dem which didn't help.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The fact that Donald got any votes when up against his diametric opposite, says more about voters. Don't tell me "Kamala didn't inspire" when you're talking about actual good people doing good things led by a learned former prosecutor vs bad people doing bad things following a multiple felony racist who failed at even being a scumbag used-house dealer and casino lowlife.

I feel the pope couldn't run against whatever scumbag the GOP puts up and get more than half the votes.

Without "liberty and justice for all," quite simply there is no "one nation" anymore anyway.

[–] CheeseToastie@lazysoci.al 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If she'd inspired enough people she'd have won. Trump is exciting. Vile, but exciting. People that vote for him like that.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca 48 points 2 days ago (1 children)

“We understand the problem, but we see no solution."

STOP HELPING HIM IS A GOOD START.

[–] CheeseToastie@lazysoci.al 4 points 1 day ago

Evidence and report his shitty behaviour and outright criminality

[–] thanksforallthefish@literature.cafe 65 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You guys in the press, with very few exceptions, are not trustworthy

And then he went to Salon ?

[–] lemmy_outta_here@lemmy.world 39 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Don’t forget that to a Trumper, Fox News has more credibility than NYTimes. They’re pretty shit at critical thinking.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] altphoto@lemmy.today 6 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Once this Orange turd is done there won't be another republican government elected for a long long time.

[–] Nalivai@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Nah, the idiots learned nothing. They will vote in line until they die

Once the orange turd is done there will only be Republican government and no more elections

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Zero22xx@lemmy.blahaj.zone 39 points 2 days ago (2 children)

This person says they signed on to the Trump team because of “DEI going too far” and because “woke culture was dividing the country,”

Retranslation: This person says they're on team reality TV star who hires news readers, influencers and family members to high powered positions without any qualifications because "DEI bad". And joined the people who made 'wokeness' an issue to divide everyone with in the first place because they're worried about it dividing people.

Have I understood that correctly?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] selkiesidhe@lemm.ee 26 points 2 days ago

Doesn't matter. You scum will still bend over. It's a Cons natural position.

[–] Bonesince1997@lemmy.world 20 points 2 days ago

Take steps against your boss.

[–] Archangel1313@lemm.ee 16 points 2 days ago

the Declaration includes a description of the king of England that Trump should memorize, and perhaps recognize: “A prince whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a tyrant is unfit to be the ruler of free people.”

Lol! Does anyone honestly believe that if Trump actually read that sentence, that he would even understand what it meant? You may as well be asking a 12 year old in special ed class to read and interpret Shakespeare.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›