this post was submitted on 03 May 2025
234 points (97.6% liked)

politics

23299 readers
2806 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

On how the coming shortages are set to damage the governments already low popularity

all 44 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 18 points 11 hours ago

It's too bad they don't have an opposition party to represent them.

[–] CaliforniaSober@lemmy.ca 30 points 19 hours ago

“Americans elected a dumb asshole, and natural consequences followed.”

Look At yourself in the mirror if you wanted this. You are this.

[–] KingPorkChop@lemmy.ca 64 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (7 children)

A year ago, this Canadian would have felt a need to help our neighbours.

Right now, this Canadian is laughing and waving my bare ass in a southerly direction.

This is what you voted for you fucking idiots. You're proudly burning down your own house. Best of luck you soup brained simpletons.

[–] Shootingstarrz17@lemmy.world 11 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Some of us tried voting blue, you know... No need to group us all as the same.

[–] eskimofry@lemm.ee 0 points 2 hours ago (2 children)

those who voted blue are also kind of assholes. You guys should get real democracy going: Ranked Choice Voting. Burn the current senate, congress and Supreme court down. Build them back properly.

[–] Shootingstarrz17@lemmy.world 0 points 16 minutes ago

It's not that easy, the system will take a lot to change and it will take years. It only comes down to two options. Red or blue. Didn't have much of a choice. That doesn't make us assholes, that makes us at the very mercy of the system. Not voting or voting for the niche party means failure.

[–] agent_nycto@lemmy.world 4 points 2 hours ago

Man, if only that were possible. Every time anything local has tried anything to get ranked choice voting in or get rid of gerrymandering, it gets shot down, and if people tried any direct action they would really get shot down.

Though that second option seems to be more viable each day here.

[–] leadore@lemmy.world 49 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Go ahead and laugh but you should thank us. You all were about to elect Pollivierre until we showed you what going down that road will lead to. As the US goes down in flames we can comfort ourselves that we've served as an example to others. We celebrate that Australia also sees the light. As you point and laugh, remember that "there but for the ~~grace of god~~ ability to learn from the mistakes of others go I". I remember in the '90's when Americans were gloating over the collapse of the Soviet Union I said, "Don't laugh, we're probably next." Yes, it took longer than I expected but here we are.

[–] Early_Insurance_3334@lemmy.ca 29 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (1 children)

I agree you guys helped stop us from electing Canada's version of trump but I highly doubt the lesson learned will stick.

The vote was way too close for comfort and we had to sacrifice our left leaning party to do it.

My bet is after another term of the liberals doing fuck all to fix our problems the conservatives will get their majority next election.

I'm just shaking my head at people acting like the guy you replied to as if this country wasn't filled with dumbfucks.

Anyway best of luck to the sane Americans we will be joining you guys shortly.

[–] leadore@lemmy.world 3 points 16 hours ago

I agree you guys helped stop us from electing Canada’s version of trump but I highly doubt the lesson learned will stick.

Well, maybe it wouldn't stick if what we've seen so far was the worst of it, but unfortunately it's just the beginning. The lesson will be getting much more intense soon.

Anyway best of luck to the sane Americans we will be joining you guys shortly.

Thanks and I hope not!

[–] MagicShel@lemmy.zip 25 points 1 day ago (3 children)

We're showing the world what voting for conservatives means. Sometimes a ~~person's~~ country's purpose in life is to be an object lesson.

[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

The silver lining for the world, honestly. Maybe this will be the singular time in American history we can learn. Or maybe this is a death spiral.

[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 4 points 22 hours ago

I mean we were already more conservative than most Western countries. There was pretty much no other outcome than becoming more authoritarian if the right won. Trump is just doing what would've taken any other GOP President a few years or decades even.

[–] OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca -2 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

object lesson.

abject

adjective
(of something bad) experienced or present to the maximum degree.
(of a situation or condition) extremely unpleasant and degrading.
(of a person or their behaviour) completely without pride or dignity; self-abasing.

[–] leadore@lemmy.world 4 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Not sure why you're putting a definition of abject here? Are you saying that they should have said abject instead of object? That would mean something different.

object lesson
noun
something that serves as a practical example of a principle or abstract idea
Examples of object lesson in a Sentence
His life story is an object lesson in how not to run a business.

[–] MagicShel@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 hour ago

Maybe they were suggesting a new term of art? I don't know. I avoided up or downvoting because I couldn't tell if they were trying to be clever or confidently wrong.

I try to assume the best in people but... the world is full of all kinds. I'm hopeful, though.

[–] Guidy@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Keep in mind that many of us voted for Harris, way too many of us either didn’t care enough to vote or withheld voting because Harris wasn’t ready to nuke Israel, and the rest voted for shitler.

So no, motherfucker, this isn’t what I voted for. Edit: In case I wasn’t clear: I voted for Harris.

[–] huppakee@lemm.ee 6 points 23 hours ago

I don't think his comment was written to you personally, and I do think it is fair to put the blame of election results on the population as a whole. Although guess it's fair enough to remind people the vote was"t unanimous.

[–] Tikiporch@lemmy.world 2 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

I'm not sure how you could have helped. Positive energy? Good vibes our way?

[–] Jarix@lemmy.world 2 points 14 hours ago

Kind words and sympathy seem like the things that would have been exchanged in greater amounts but its become ironically canada first sentiments.

I personally am thankful that because of the events we didnt elect PP as consequence. But Ide much rather have better world unity right now.

None of us are united right now. Perhaps more polarized than we would have been, but we have to respond to how the world is, not how we wish it was, or how it will be after we respond, however that is.

And im sorry, Jordan Petersen is apparently your problem now. Feel free to charge him personally all the tariffs you can throw at him

[–] 4grams@awful.systems 2 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

You have a lovely ass and we do not deserve to bask in its glory.

At least fart in our direction…

[–] dryfter@lemm.ee 1 points 12 minutes ago
[–] xyzzy@lemm.ee 75 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 39 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Switch that recession into a depression. This is gonna rival 1929.

[–] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 1 points 38 minutes ago

One big difference. Every country on the planet used tariffs to create the 1929 Great Depression. This time there is only one country creating a tariff war, while the rest of world circumvents the USA and continues trading under normal conditions.

[–] gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world 22 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The protest crowds this summer will be massive and MAGA will lose their goddamn minds over it

[–] piecat@lemmy.world 4 points 16 hours ago

How long until our very own tiananmen square?

[–] Revan343@lemmy.ca 4 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

What the hell, I thought we were gonna do the roaring 20s first; that's early

Nah man that was the Biden admin when we had high employment and got inflation under control.

[–] igg@lemmy.world 7 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

We are already in a recession lol

[–] CaliforniaSober@lemmy.ca 2 points 19 hours ago

No that’s Biden’s fault or some shit

[–] cabron_offsets@lemmy.world 24 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Ppl buying into US stocks now are fucking insane. Check back in a month.

[–] blakenong@lemmings.world 11 points 1 day ago

Also US houses.

[–] barneypiccolo@lemm.ee 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

I'm ready for a "Hot Tariff Summer." By Christmas, 75% of Americans will be out of their minds about HitlerPig and his MAGA Nazis, and a good portion of the remaining 25% will be outwardly supportive, but inwardly worrying badly. A few will be loving it, but they're just pyschopaths.

At that point it's going to start getting really, really ugly. The plan is make people so angry that the protests will get violent, and if they don't get violent on their own, he'll encourage his RedHats to instigate it. Then he'll send in the military to quell the violence with even more ferocious violence. This is why he is keeping Hegseth, no matter how poor his performance at the Pentagon - he is confident that Hegseth will order American troops to fire on American citizens who are exercising their 1st Amendment rights.

Hegseth will also launch a nuclear weapon, if ordered, and that day is coming.

[–] conditional_soup@lemm.ee 1 points 54 minutes ago (1 children)

I cannot fathom that two officers in the military, no matter how deranged the government is, would ever agree to turn the key against a domestic target.

[–] barneypiccolo@lemm.ee 1 points 49 minutes ago

I decade ago, I would have thought it was impossible, too. I no longer believe that. There are people in our government who would love to nuke a blue city like Portland, just to prove how scary they are.

[–] Sunsofold@lemmings.world 2 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

While Trump seems morally capable of doing such things, nothing about his history has suggested he has the competence for it to be a coherent master plan.

[–] barneypiccolo@lemm.ee 2 points 17 hours ago

It's not that complicated a plan, even a moron like HitlerPig could understand it, but that doesn't mean he will actually accomplish his objective. It is likely that in the end, we will be saved by his virtuosic incompetence.

[–] griff@lemmings.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

as per usual the cops get violent

[–] griff@lemmings.world 2 points 1 day ago

& yes, the amendments will become endments

[–] fluffykittycat@slrpnk.net 2 points 22 hours ago

You say that but military attacking your assistance would be the worst movie they can make, because that one not only make the regime look extremely bad it also puts lead ammo on the playing field, something that neither side and wanted to escalate to last time. Two can play that game.

[–] altphoto@lemmy.today 3 points 22 hours ago

I was just looking for some screws on Amazon and it said "out of stock, we're working to get more soon". Could this be it?

[–] Goretantath@lemm.ee 4 points 1 day ago