this post was submitted on 02 May 2025
795 points (98.8% liked)

Funny

10572 readers
204 users here now

General rules:

Exceptions may be made at the discretion of the mods.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works 126 points 2 months ago (18 children)

We make logging companies "replant forests" (yes it's not at all the same as the old growth but it's something). Why do we let mining companies completely rape the land and replace nothing? It doesn't even look like they backfill with the unused debris, much less restore topsoil or plant anything.

[–] nfamwap@feddit.uk 50 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (3 children)

Here in the UK I know of lots of old mines and quarries that, because the ground is inherently unstable once the mining has finished, the land gets reclaimed as a nature reserve. Think nice walks, wildflowers, native trees, marshlands etc. A lot of effort goes into making habitats for insects, birds and animals.

Whether or not it is all paid for by the mining companies, I don't know.

[–] HasturInYellow@lemmy.world 25 points 2 months ago

It isn't. I guarantee it.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

That's how we do it here in the US if they're operating near an urban area. My understanding is that they are required by law to do that in exchange for the permits or something.

[–] turtlesareneat@discuss.online 10 points 2 months ago

Only if the city cares. I'm in a capital city where strip mining occurs within city limits, and they just leave acid pools behind because the thick forests keep people from noticing it

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] pitiable_sandwich540@feddit.org 23 points 2 months ago (9 children)

Well, not 100% on this, but maybe because we're an overaged society that elects corrupt politicians rather than accept that change in lifestyle is necessary? Or maybe it is the brainwashing of the Springer-press that continues to vilify the Greens. Maybe a mix of both.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] bob_lemon@feddit.org 19 points 2 months ago

They do backfill, but they obviously lose quite a bit of volume in the process, so they cannot completely fill the hole. The remaining part is usually flooded.

[–] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 16 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Where I live they are required to rehabilitate the land afterwards, but usually that's after the mine has been running for like 30+ years and by the time they shut down, they do some weird financial trickery and declare bankruptcy despite having made millions in profits the previous decades and then they just walk away and tax payers need to clean up.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] FleetingTit@feddit.org 11 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It will be turned into a giant lake once they are done mining. You burn a lot of volume and filling it wil soil again is just not possible

[–] lagoon8622@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 months ago

Except they actually do backfill it and plant trees; it's still an ecological horror though

[–] index@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 months ago

Why do we let mining companies completely rape the land and replace nothing?

The government spend billions to brainwash people and turn them complicit. Check out the "germany rearming" threads to see how even on lemmy plenty of people are happy with the raping.

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] DannyBoy@sh.itjust.works 93 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] Asetru@feddit.org 51 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] ooterness@lemmy.world 40 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The Bagger 288 is there to safeguard all mankind.

The Bagger 288 wreaks total utter devastation.

The Bagger 288 contains an artificial mind.

This mind is full of hatred, violence is its sole vocation.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] saltnotsugar@lemm.ee 67 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Being destroyed by a giant machine is terrible but it did file the proper paperwork first so what can be done at this point?

[–] Infinite@lemmy.zip 16 points 2 months ago

Just enjoy the hyperspace bypass, I expect.

[–] HowAbt2morrow@futurology.today 10 points 2 months ago

There’s a lot to be said about dotted eyes and crossed teas.

[–] Zabjam@lemm.ee 7 points 2 months ago

I hate so much how accurate this is as a metaphor for how many politicians deal with the fascist AfD.

[–] rickyrigatoni@lemm.ee 54 points 2 months ago

Uhm no bagger-288 was created to protect mankind from godzillas and doom robots from the future.

[–] applemao@lemmy.world 48 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] chellomere@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

[–] untakenusername@sh.itjust.works 40 points 2 months ago

ok I hate coal and fossil fuels, but this thing is so cool

[–] edgemaster72@lemmy.world 39 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Alternatively, build a flying machine with TNT duplicators

[–] janus2@lemmy.sdf.org 15 points 2 months ago (2 children)

[ilmango intro music] 🥭🥭🥭

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] j5906@feddit.org 36 points 2 months ago (10 children)
[–] TheOctonaut@mander.xyz 42 points 2 months ago (4 children)

Those photos are from planes.

[–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 40 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

Probably, but the entire idea of "you can see it from space" is stupid anyways. Its only meaningful if its with the naked eye and the distance is specified. You can see anything from space if you have enough optical zoom...

[–] Revan343@lemmy.ca 9 points 2 months ago

You can see anything from space if you have enough optical zoom...

Naw, there's theoretical a maximum resolution, iirc it's a few centimeters. Too much air in the way diffracting the light

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] ryedaft@sh.itjust.works 10 points 2 months ago

You can see people's backyard trampolines.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] Uebercomplicated@lemmy.ml 33 points 2 months ago

This is very real and has been an issue for years. I remember when I was younger, watching public TV, and I saw a news report about an elderly lady who was forced to sell her home along with the rest of her village so that they could dig up the entire area for coal. At the time it was a big deal, because she took so long to agree, which got media attention. It was incredibly depressing. It felt dystopian.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 30 points 2 months ago (2 children)

It is an engineering marvel, indeed, as it is the biggest mobile machine of the world.

[–] Saleh@feddit.org 17 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] Silic0n_Alph4@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

Ahh, you just beat me to it!

[–] Anomalocaris@lemm.ee 23 points 2 months ago

every rational part of my brain fighting the 7 year old me inside me who knows Bagger 288 is the coolest thing ever

[–] Lucky_777@lemmy.world 18 points 2 months ago

Looks like a Final Fantasy optional boss.

[–] JeSuisUnHombre@lemm.ee 13 points 2 months ago

Funny and sad

[–] Wilco@lemm.ee 13 points 2 months ago

It's a man-made Langolier.... slowly eating a dying world no one wants.

[–] dQw4w9WgXcQ@lemm.ee 11 points 2 months ago

I love how I know the name Bagger 288 because of a 16 year old meme

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Removed from the environment.

[–] 1995ToyotaCorolla@lemmy.world 19 points 2 months ago

Why remove something from the environment when you can just remove the environment

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago

Just as well. 'tis a silly place.

load more comments
view more: next ›