this post was submitted on 28 Apr 2025
412 points (98.6% liked)

politics

23225 readers
3220 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Tragically, the president’s second term is already more lawless and more authoritarian than any in US history

In his first 100 days back in office, Donald Trump has made a strong case that his second term will be by far the worst presidential term in US history.

So many of his flood-the-zone actions have been head-spinning and stomach-turning. His administration seems to be powered by ignorance and incoherence, spleen and sycophancy.

Both he and his right-hand man, Elon Musk, with their resentment-fueled desire to disrupt everything, seem intent on pulverizing the foundations of our government, our democracy, our alliances as well as any notions of truth.

all 40 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 13 points 22 hours ago

Honestly, it is almost impressive how quickly Trump speedrunned the self-destruction of the United States. I think there will be a Hearts of Iron category for deleting one's own nation from existence.

[–] Bieren@lemmy.world 12 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah. But sleepy joe. lol. I’m so funny I called him a name.

[–] Soulg@ani.social 6 points 18 hours ago

He has dementia! So let's elect a guy with even MORE dementia!

[–] collapse_already@lemmy.ml 6 points 20 hours ago

"Is already "

[–] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world 5 points 23 hours ago (1 children)
[–] noxypaws@pawb.social 94 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] arin@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

Yup i came here to say this, the treasonist traitor wants a 3rd term.....

[–] Bytemeister@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Will? If he died 2 weeks ago and had been puppeted along by a nazi AI piloting a T100 in his flabby skinsuit, it would still be a contender for the worst presidential term ever, and we haven't even cleared 100 days.

[–] thallamabond@lemmy.world 100 points 1 day ago (6 children)

Oh come on now, you're not even going to give his third term a chance? I got $10 says it's worse.

[–] Lucky_777@lemmy.world 21 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Sure we had second breakfast, but what about elevenes. Lunch. Tea, dinner. Supper?

[–] shittydwarf@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 1 day ago

I don't think they know about third term Pip

[–] aceshigh@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

I’m curious about his 4th term if he lives that long. At that point he’ll be wearing a crown on his head. I can see it. Hell dress like British royalty.

[–] WindyRebel@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

$10 is what one egg will cost by the end of this.

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 2 points 1 day ago

Probably half by then.

[–] P00ptart@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Can I borrow $10 for 3 years and 9 months?

[–] ubergeek@lemmy.today 2 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Sure, but it'll only have the buying power of $3 today...

[–] P00ptart@lemmy.world 1 points 11 hours ago

True, but inflation means that it's easier to pay back loans, inflation always benefits those who are most in debt.

[–] sfxrlz@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

How old do you expect bigmacdonald to get?

[–] thallamabond@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Well his doctor did say he could possibly live to be 200.

"I told the President that if he had a healthier diet over the last 20 years he might live to be 200 years old"

https://www.cnn.com/2018/01/16/politics/dr-ronny-jackson-donald-trump-clean-bill-of-health/index.html

[–] MegaUltraChicken@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

Palantir feverishly working on his life sustaining Palpatine chair to float him around as Peter Thiel screams at some intern for being unable to procure kyber crystals

[–] oxysis@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] thallamabond@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Low energy!

[–] Aeri@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago
[–] BigMacHole@lemm.ee 30 points 1 day ago

We need to DEPORT The Guardian for Publishing this!

-Americans who FERVENTLY DEFEND ELEMENTARY SCHOOL SHOOTERS because of the Constitution!

[–] jagged_circle 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] clutchtwopointzero@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Indeed, since the administration threatened to arrest supreme court justices as well

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Might also be the last presidential term ever.

[–] jagged_circle 2 points 1 day ago

Nah. He'll die.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

James Buchanan has set the bare extraordinarily high. To date, Trump still hasn't even topped Hoover.

This isn't in any way a defense of Trump, but modern Americans have this idea in their heads that every President in history was somewhere on spectrum of Bill Clinton and George Bush. The bitter truth is that the pre-FDR presidencies were so much fucking worse. Trump is right in line with your Andrew Johnsons and Zachary Taylors and Warren G. Hardings and Benjamin Harrisons. He is not exceptional in his awfulness. He is a reversion to the historical mean.

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

There's a difference between the three presidents.

Hoover was sadly trapped into an economic and political thinking that wasn't suited for the Great Depression. He tried to help the country, but the help was largely ineffectual or harmful. FDR's administration approached the Great Depression from a radically different point of view.

Buchanan was laughably incompetent, which was the style of the time for presidents before Lincoln. Buchanan didn't respond to active rebellion because he didn't think he could.

Trump is actively malicious. He is allowing for the gutting of civilian government under his watch while trying to shift taxation to a system he can control to bypass Congress. Not even Andrew Jackson was that brazen.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago

Hoover was sadly trapped into an economic and political thinking that wasn’t suited for the Great Depression.

Hoover was a fascist to his bones and an egotistical maniac. He unleashed the military on strikers and labor organizers including the Bonus Army, imposed some of the most draconian immigration regulations of the era, and aided the Axis Powers in rebuilding and rearming with the help of his friends in the Bush family.

Far from trying to help, Hoover's immediate legacy was a rapid consolidation of wealth into the hands of Republican allied industries and agricultural magnets. The vicious economic squeeze ultimately lead to a surge of unemployment and a collapse in Republican popular support, humiliating Hoover in the midst of his demand for greater private philanthropy.

But this was in pursuit of corporate oligopoly. The efforts failed because the lumpen proles could no longer tolerate their collective immiseration. Not because Hoover lacked ambition.

Buchanan was laughably incompetent, which was the style of the time for presidents before Lincoln. Buchanan didn’t respond to active rebellion because he didn’t think he could.

Buchanan cultivated a Democratic Party of insurrection and normalized the bloody suppression of abolitionists. He did respond the active rebellion. John Brown's rebellion. And Harriet Tubman's rebellion.

But, like the Southern secessionists who would follow him, he underestimated the passion and the sincerity of their revolutionary convictions.

Did the guardian hire captain obvious or is this freelance work he's doing?

And it might still be the term that won't end.

[–] expatriado@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] don@lemm.ee 1 points 1 day ago

Those who voted for Harris knew this early into his first regime. Those who voted against her (not voting is still voting) are the fucking ghouls who should get the grand prize of a all expenses paid ticket to El Salvador’ CECOT resort for their well-earned permanent residence.

[–] numbermess@fedia.io 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] toiletobserver@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

If? My man, you might want to find a news summary of the first 100 days.