this post was submitted on 16 Apr 2025
802 points (97.7% liked)

Political Memes

7805 readers
3175 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Master@lemm.ee 3 points 23 hours ago

I would also shoot regan

[–] Wilco@lemm.ee 32 points 1 day ago (4 children)

It is so strange. After the Republicans turned a depression into the Great Depression with tariffs and then Watergate, it seemed like they were no longer relevant. Then Reagan came along, and was an extremely liberal conservative. Reagan "invented" the no fault divorce so that couples would no longer have to sue each other and declare one of them at fault. The republican party should have went extinct at Bush Episode 1... "read my lips, no new taxes" (he lied and was a one term president because of it).

Then Bush Episode 2, who was a complete idiot ... then Trump. Why? How can this stupid corrupt party still be relevant?

[–] Bouzou@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Religion. They are the "Christian party."

I mean, literally none of their actions reflect the teachings of Christ, but culturally they have entrenched themselves as the only religion Christians can choose (at least, from the view of many Christians).

[–] Wilco@lemm.ee 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm not very religious ... and most "conservatives" are a bit to unchristian and evil for my taste. A greedy drug fueled billionaire with 13+ kids by who-knows-how-many mother's should not be relevant in "conservative" politics, but there he is. We will not discuss how/why they tolerate Trump ... that makes even less sense.

They aren't conservative, they are fascist.

[–] Bouzou@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago

Truly. Trump and his ilk are like if you made the antithesis of Christ's teachings in lab...

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Reagan wasn't Liberal by any stretch. He was economically Libertarian except for when he tariffed nations like Japan and he promoted gun control when the black panthers started making headlines.

[–] Wilco@lemm.ee 2 points 1 day ago

No fault divorce was a very VERY liberal concept.

[–] Raiderkev@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

Because racist people like dog whistles

[–] the_trash_man@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago

Stupid voters and corrupt money

[–] Zoboomafoo@slrpnk.net 4 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Reagan was a fucking actor that was reading lines, shooting him would have done nothing. They'd just find a new electable moron to read the party's script.

[–] AngryRobot@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

If I had a time machine, I'd kill whoever at NBC greenlit The Apprentice. That's what started this ball rolling.

Same can be said about Hitler , well painter then. Wouldn't have stopped the war anyhow. Still worth doing

[–] Raiderkev@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Ronald Reagan, THE ACTOR?!

[–] easily3667@lemmus.org 4 points 1 day ago

Thank you for your service

[–] conditional_soup@lemm.ee 129 points 2 days ago (3 children)
[–] fossphi@lemm.ee 60 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] Jesus_666@lemmy.world 47 points 2 days ago (1 children)

On this blessed day we are all a girl.

[–] SippyCup 29 points 2 days ago (2 children)

"Oh my God, Still just an actor Ronald Reagan you're in danger!"

"What do you mean still just an-"

[–] ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

No one gives a shit about some B-list celebrity being taken out.

[–] SippyCup 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

"somebody shot Ronald Reagan!"

"Who?"

"The Boraxo cleaner commercial guy!"

"Again I ask, who??"

Boraxo Ronald?

[–] SARGE@startrek.website 13 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Yaaaaas queen. 🔫👸💅

[–] SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org 5 points 1 day ago

SLAY 😈 Like the Doom Slayer I mean

[–] Godric@lemmy.world 45 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Shoot, this is a particularly rough time to discover that

Assigned Female At Conception hop in whos driving this time machine

[–] Pirky@lemmy.world 16 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Right? I'm fuckin pissed.
Just as I start figuring out my identity and start expressing my truer, happier self, I also have to start looking out for my own safety. It makes me want to fucking rage.

[–] NielsBohron@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I'm not sure it helps, but just know that there are plenty of cis-hets out there willing to use our privilege to fucking rage on your behalf.

[–] empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] conditional_soup@lemm.ee 24 points 2 days ago

Feeling cute, might also keep that sob Kissinger from dying peacefully in his sleep.

[–] AdrianTheFrog@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

You could just hop back through time doing this, and no one could ever catch you at the end because you hadn't even committed those crimes yet

[–] Dagnet@lemmy.world 48 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] Godric@lemmy.world 33 points 2 days ago (2 children)

You expect a senile old man to use proper grammar?

[–] gnutrino@programming.dev 23 points 2 days ago

I assumed that was why she shot him

Yes he had cue cards

Unless it is Margaret Thatcher who went back in time, then she and Reagan would fuck.

[–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 22 points 2 days ago (1 children)

If they aren't shooting now, they aren't shooting back then.

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

TBF if security were more lax and Trump's Itinerary were more accessible then we might be talking. Looking up all the places and times Reagan was is trivial.

Though I suppose you could travel forwards and then backwards but I think the hypothetical implies we don't have a time machine to use against the present tyrant?

[–] shawn1122@lemm.ee 17 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

You would need to target Jude Wanniski (conservative economist). Reagan wasn't the one who came up with supply side economics though he was an effective face of the message, reviving the Republican Party from its loss of credibility due to Nixon.

Part of it is just unbridled American level greed though. America has a good thing going post WW2, having horded 80% of the worlds gold supply by selling weapons to allies and staying out of the war until instigated by Japan in '41.

Also had a good thing going with the New Deal which helped pull the economy out of the great depression and bolstered / introduced many of the public services that are still in use today.

But no, dangle some marginal tax cuts in front of common folk who have the best standard of living in the world and apparently they'll vote for acceleration toward end stage capitalism.

[–] Dragonstaff@leminal.space 5 points 1 day ago

Conservative policies need a (🤢) charismatic celebrity to connect with people and convince them to vote to destroy the country. DeSantis could never be this effective.

I have no idea how Trump, of all people, is so charismatic, but I'm not a racist.

[–] toast@retrolemmy.com 8 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

That's pretty unrealistic. No girl has come close to shooting a president since Ford was in office.

[–] Dragonstaff@leminal.space 4 points 1 day ago

We also don't have time travel. That seems like the unrealistic part.

[–] betterdeadthanreddit@lemmy.world 24 points 2 days ago (1 children)

What I'm hearing is that we can't elect a woman president but that other notable milestones related to the presidency are up for grabs.

[–] toast@retrolemmy.com 9 points 2 days ago

You're not not hearing that, anyway

[–] LostWanderer@lemmynsfw.com 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›