this post was submitted on 15 Apr 2025
343 points (99.1% liked)

Fuck Cars

11565 readers
1341 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

China's embassy in Washington, D.C., has shared an image contrasting the country's rail infrastructure with that of the United States in a pointed jab at Beijing's rival amid simmering trade tensions.

all 42 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] HappySkullsplitter@lemmy.world 130 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Deservedly so

Our rail system is shit

I think most of the world probably has a better rail system than the US

We are forced to use cars or aircraft

[–] absGeekNZ@lemmy.nz 20 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Hey hey, we have shit rail infrastructure also.

[–] Baggie@lemmy.zip 9 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Wait seriously? I guess yeah I've never seen rail when I've been in NZ, does the land not really accommodate or something?

[–] absGeekNZ@lemmy.nz 13 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

So many reasons.

But smallish population and a big distance between major population centers means rail is expensive. Relative to population size.

But also the government (for the last 40 years) hasn't prioritized investment in rail. It is always roads, always.

[–] newaccountwhodis@lemmy.ml 9 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

But smallish population and a big distance between major population centers means rail is expensive. Relative to population size.

This is also true for roads. Prioritizing roads is ideologically motivated.

[–] desktop_user@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

would airports be better? they have better max distance per cost figures, but are more expensive per passenger.

[–] newaccountwhodis@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Flying doesn't need as much infrastructure so that's definitely a factor. I couldn't find the cost per passenger kilometer to compare so I can only say that flying emits much more co2 than every other form of transportation. Since climate change is going to cost us a lot I'd say the cost of flying exceeds the costs of car resp. train infrastructure.

[–] desktop_user@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 3 weeks ago

roads and rail also emit co2 though, and require regular maintenance that emits still more. at some point (perhaps it would be less than a flight per year) flying would emit less than the maintenance of infrastructure.

[–] Baggie@lemmy.zip 3 points 3 weeks ago

I guess I get it, that still sucks.

[–] floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

The first time I went on opentrainmap and looked at the "electrification" layer I thought there had to be a bug. All my life I had assumed the US had at least some high-voltage main lines but no. Almost 0 overhead lines, basically only metros are electric. My European brain can't comprehend not being able to take a 1h train ride to the next city over

[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 52 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (3 children)

That’s the result of 40 years of trickle-down failing to trickle down. Had we taxed our wealthy, we too would have advanced infrastructure.

[–] FireRetardant@lemmy.world 15 points 3 weeks ago

We wouldn't even have needed to increase their taxs (we still should) car infrastructure is so horrendously expensive that they would have been saving money by investing more in rail and transit instead of "just one more lane bro"

[–] FenrirIII@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

It's not the amount of taxes, it's where the money is going. Big oil and car companies spend millions lobbying the government not to build or fund rail.

[–] selkiesidhe@lemm.ee 36 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

China's mocking posts have been seriously on point as of late. Keep em coming, guys! Nothing gets to dumb people more than being mocked!

[–] nova_ad_vitum@lemmy.ca 11 points 3 weeks ago

Let the meme wars begin .

[–] Magister@lemmy.world 29 points 3 weeks ago

China posting meme about trains, eggs, things like this, is humorous!

[–] 5714@lemmy.dbzer0.com 22 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

WTF is going on? Meme diplomacy with memes, LLM and diss tracks? I don't want to find to find this funny, but it kinda is. Still, SILENCE, ~~BRAND~~ STATE

[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 20 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Trump used twitter and memes as a form of communication during his first term and is continuing this term.

China is just using his preferred form of communication: shitposting.

[–] 5714@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 3 weeks ago

Well, so far China is winning.

[–] BeMoreCareful@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago

Soundbites to memes. It sort of makes sense.

[–] Monument@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 3 weeks ago

A shaken Stephen Miller is trying to figure out which family members he can threaten to deport to gain leverage over the ‘epic rap battles’ guys, so they can beatbox us into WW3.

[–] JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world 20 points 3 weeks ago

This is what superpower competition should look like.

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 17 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Excellent piece of propaganda! 👏

E: The word propaganda does not mean the material is wrong.

[–] Tempus_Fugit@midwest.social 11 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

😂 this platform is too full of reactionaries. This is literally the definition of propaganda. I'm not saying it's bad at all, but it IS propaganda.

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 8 points 3 weeks ago

Excellent at that! ☺️

[–] Kowowow@lemmy.ca 12 points 3 weeks ago

When are they adding memes to cultural victory requirements in civilization games?

[–] mlg@lemmy.world 11 points 3 weeks ago

Hey now that's an unfair comparison to freight trains. Just because the Amtrak never showed up doesn't mean you can't find a photo of it.

[–] Tempus_Fugit@midwest.social 10 points 3 weeks ago

Well our trains are definitely mock worthy. Can't be mad at that.

[–] hanrahan@slrpnk.net 5 points 3 weeks ago

Hopefully they mock Australia as well and deservedly so, our rail system is laughable

[–] Aatube@kbin.melroy.org 1 points 3 weeks ago

inb4 some come and say it makes america look badass