JubilantJaguar

joined 2 years ago
[–] JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago

Yes I know, I literally do it myself with a Python script right now for 3 sites. I just wish someone would generously provide a hosted and maintained service that does this. IMO it could be a game changer. For some people a single source that lacks a feed is a deal breaker for RSS.

[–] JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world 7 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

If it, or some other service, could find a way to publish feeds of content for sites which don't have RSS feeds, now that would be really useful.

[–] JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world 5 points 5 hours ago

Several years ago I came to the conclusion that, for the kind of device models that I personally use (i.e. cheap ones), rooting has now become too complicated and dangerous (if not impossible) and that it's better simply to move my computing back to the desktop while waiting for a more open and free mobile platform to emerge.

[–] JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world -1 points 6 hours ago

And your point is... what?

[–] JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world 1 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

La croyance comme quoi les groupes historiquement marginalisés sont en quelque sorte sacrés. J'ai vu cette définition récemment d'une source plus ou moins neutre. Pour moi ça évoque la tendance à voir la société à travers le prisme des luttes de pouvoir entre des groupes. Les concepts clés en étant pouvoir et groupe (l'individu n'est plus de mise). Bien trop facile de dire que puisque la définition est difficile à saisir, la chose n'existe pas. Ça existe bel et bien, ces idées sont même majoritaires parmi les plus jeunes.

[–] JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world 3 points 10 hours ago

Well that puts the loss of my little VPS into perspective.

[–] JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world -2 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

Sure, I get that. The simpler remedy here would just be to ban ultra-niche support questions. Look at the title of this community then look at the title of this topic and ask yourself: were you interested in it? I wasn't.

[–] JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world 6 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

And terrible, archaic, chaotic practices such as activating your 2FA without permission and then locking you out of your account for weeks pending multiple signed paper letters. Oh, and sometimes their datacenters burn down and take your server with them. I'm sad to have to throw them under the bus like this. I want OVH to succeed but personally my patience with them definitively ran out.

[–] JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world 2 points 11 hours ago

What would happen if everybody decided to do that? Personally I think there are places which we should be content to admire from a distance.

[–] JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world -1 points 12 hours ago (4 children)

Insane is a big word. There's a separate one on the R-site so why not here? Then people who want to participate in Stack Exchange-style Q&A can subscribe to that and those who just want to discuss Linux as a subject won't have to bat away spam about the exact syntax to some obscure video-editing utility.

[–] JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world 44 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

There's a lot of hate and anger here directed against the driver, who was of course himself full of hate and anger. He should rot in hell etc etc, it's all very American. None of that will solve anything. This is about systems. Paris is too dense for cars, let alone SUVs, but humans like their cars and will buy them and use them if we don't decide collectively to prevent it. The tragedy here was not that one entitled guy blew a gasket and did something he surely regretted instantly, it's that we all, together, allowed this situation to occur. A rush-hour boulevard crammed with too-big cars, in a city which is already as dense as a hothouse, in a country with increasingly angry and polarized politics. The problem is not individuals, it's systems.

I'm sorry if if this is too sophisticated an argument for this community, but I speak with direct experience of the subject at hand and I would like to see the problem actually solved. Anger directed at this individual miscreant is IMO an almost irrelevant distraction that will not solve anything.

 
  • New research concludes that humanity would benefit more if it aims for ecological sustainability and stays within the limits of what Earth can provide, rather than pursuing relentless growth.
  • The success of capitalism depends on the push for growth, which requires the use of resources and energy, and comes at the cost of ecological damage.
  • Economists have proposed alternatives that focus on staying within a set of planetary boundaries that define the safe operating space for humanity.
  • The review, published in the journal Lancet Planetary Health, draws on more than 200 resources from the scientific literature.
 

This one really did happen in the shower.

 

Banks, email providers, booking sites, e-commerce, basically anything where money is involved, it's always the same experience. If you use the Android or iOS app, you stayed signed in indefinitely. If you use a web browser, you get signed out and asked to re-authenticate constantly - and often you have to do it painfully using a 2FA factor.

For either of my banks, if I use their crappy Android app all I have to do is input a short PIN to get access. But in Firefox I also get signed out after about 10 minutes without interaction and have to enter full credentials again to get back in - and, naturally, they conceal the user ID field from the login manager to be extra annoying.

For a couple of other services (also involving money) it's 2FA all the way. Literally no means of staying signed in on a desktop browser more than a single session - presumably defined as 30 minutes or whatever. Haven't tried their own crappy mobile apps but I doubt very much it is such a bad experience.

Who else is being driven crazy by this? How is there any technical justification for this discrimination? Browsers store login tokens just like blackbox spyware on Android-iOS, there is nothing to stop you staying signed in indefinitely. The standard justification seems to be that web browsers are less secure than mobile apps - is there any merit at all to this argument?

Or is all this just a blatant scam to push people to install privacy-destroying spyware apps on privacy-destroying spyware OSs, thus helping to further undermine the most privacy-respecting software platform we have: the web.

If so, could a legal challenge be mounted using the latest EU rules? Maybe it's time for Open Web Advocacy to get on the case.

Thoughts appreciated.

view more: next ›