this post was submitted on 14 Mar 2025
239 points (99.6% liked)

politics

21775 readers
3775 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer announced during a floor speech Thursday evening that he will vote to advance the stopgap spending bill that must become law before Friday at midnight to avoid a partial government shutdown.

top 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BigTurkeyLove@lemmy.world 15 points 5 hours ago

Get these spineless geriatric corporate shill democrats out of office!

[–] makeshiftreaper@lemmy.world 35 points 8 hours ago (1 children)
  1. It doesn't matter what they do, Republicans will always blame Democrats for everything. They blame Democrats for the results of Republican policy, so why are you concerned about a blame game?

  2. Republicans have control of every part of the federal government, The House, Senate, Presidency, and Supreme Court. As long as Democrats just vote no and don't impede legislation (which they should also do, but I digress), their messaging should be "look how fucking incompetent your leadership is. They have every tool at their disposal and still can't run a government effectively." Why is it the Democrats job to assist them? It's not like Republicans would do the same

I know the answer is that Democrats exist to placate people while Republicans continue enriching the wealthy but man it'd be nice if they grew a fucking spine

[–] Xanza@lemm.ee 5 points 3 hours ago

This is a perfect nutshell statement as to why everyone is pissed.

All Democrats had to do was stand back and let the fucking circus start on schedule and everyone would be able to see the shit show that it is....

It's absolutely hilarious to me that all's Democrats had to do with nothing, something that they're incredibly used to doing, and they can't even get that right. I'm so fucking tired of these pompous fucks.

[–] Suavevillain@lemmy.world 41 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

What is the point of being scared in a government shutdown when Trump is currently dismantling most major services workforces?

Chuck is a coward and doing the work of his donor class.

[–] Grimy@lemmy.world 9 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

The dismantling goes into overdrive if they send all the juges who can stop it on vacation. I really want them to shut it down but I don't think it would help.

[–] OfficeMonkey@lemmy.today 4 points 3 hours ago

The bill has a poison pill -- it allows Trump to shift funding. So yes, judges on vacation bad, but the bill effectively authorizes the behavior of the meme department.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 88 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

they used to have a word for people like Schumer.

COLLABORATOR.

[–] makyo@lemmy.world 20 points 10 hours ago

Yep - he must step down as minority leader. This is unacceptable.

[–] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 30 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

We used to, but we still do

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 15 points 12 hours ago

Thanks, Mitch.

[–] circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org 12 points 11 hours ago
[–] Today@lemmy.world 7 points 10 hours ago

Incredibly disappointing.

[–] casmael@lemm.ee 3 points 8 hours ago

Weak, pathetic, embarrassing, bizarre, illegible, inexcusable

[–] Placebonickname@lemmy.world 17 points 12 hours ago (2 children)
[–] frostysauce@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

Always has been.

[–] Gigasser@lemmy.world 19 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

That or someone has dirt/bpackmail on his ass, which should mean he should be ineligible for the house minority leader position.

[–] supernight52@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

"Someone" almost guaranteed to be Musk. The dude already has access to every sensitive US system, and his little goose-steppers likely are digging for dirt on anyone and everyone, so he can continue to expand his control over the country.

[–] Pronell@lemmy.world 8 points 11 hours ago

Federalist Society member.

[–] snausagesinablanket@lemmy.world 14 points 12 hours ago

Walking waste of oxygen.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 14 points 12 hours ago

Chuck is short for Vidkun.