this post was submitted on 02 Mar 2025
465 points (95.7% liked)

Political Memes

6350 readers
3129 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Like:

People should be allowed to exist

Social programs aren't communism

The system isn't working for the people

Edit:

I've changed my mind on this.

Let the DNC go full MAGA and when they lose, because they will lose, they get the heat and we can eject them forever. At least sit them in a corner.

Progressives, you fight if you want but I don't believe the elections will be fair so it's a win win for you.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] missingno@fedia.io 78 points 16 hours ago (3 children)

Do they think that Kamala lost because she was too far left?

[–] conditional_soup@lemm.ee 33 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

As someone else noted, the right said that, because yeah, they're going to say that. Here in about two years, they're going to be saying Hitler and the Confederacy lost their wars because they were too woke. BUT WAIT there's more! As I understand it, when they gutted the Biden campaign to make it the Kamalampaign, they foisted a bunch of the high-level HRC campaign staff on her, which, if you look at it, explains why so much of the Kamalampaign looks and smells exactly like the Hillary campaign. Of course, when these doofuses lost again, rather than showing a smidge of self-awareness, they promptly gave interviews saying that it's clearly because they were too far left (socially, specifically, though I wouldn't be at all shocked to hear that they meant it economically too).

[–] WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today 5 points 9 hours ago

Hitler had welfare and (tried) to spare a jewish friend. That makes him a commie!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] PostingPenguin@feddit.org 14 points 15 hours ago

The right had tried to paint it that way. Apparently their propaganda worked quite well....

[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 29 points 14 hours ago (3 children)

I've been saying this for a number of months now you got to kill this party. Abandon it completely. We got to start a new party. We got to start a labor party. A worker party. A party of the people. Whatever we want to call it, but whatever it's called it's a party that's not for the big corporate donors that control the Democratic Party. The Democratic party basically since the late '70s but certainly since the '80s abandoned the people the peoples issues. They're not coming back.

[–] Irelephant@lemm.ee 1 points 7 hours ago (5 children)

The usa needs something like ranked choice before that becomes any way viable.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Gobbel2000@programming.dev 8 points 13 hours ago

Dear US-Americans, it is time to form a new, progressive party.

[–] thespcicifcocean@lemmy.world 16 points 15 hours ago

Excuse we, what?

[–] rocket_dragon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 143 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

Jesus Christ, is this real?

Big cities have problems, but they are still far better off than small town rural America. There isn't some specific failure happening in large cities, you're seeing the broad inevitable enshittification of Capitalism as a system.

Democrats must be some serious masochists, they would actually rather take the blame thenselves than admit capitalism is wrong.

DNC: we tried bootlicking billionaires and it didn't work, what if we double down on bootlicking billionaires even harder.

[–] LostWon@lemmy.ca 64 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

It's also reported here. This fits with the reports of complaining that Democratic Congresspeople have been doing about the progressive wing of the party wanting them to fight back against DOGE. They and party leadership may well be aiming to not just talk like it, but fully become the new Republican party, in hopes of having a stampede of "moderate" Republicans who aren't happy with Trump come their way.

[–] LostWon@lemmy.ca 42 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Also, big donors are angry at them, so I guess they're trying to win those donors back.

[–] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 31 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

It's always about the dollars, not about the votes

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] jonne@infosec.pub 32 points 21 hours ago

The top of the Democratic party basically wants to become the party of big money and try and steal this mantle from the Republicans.

Obviously, this isn't going to work because the donors will just go for the party that will give them more, and they will always be the Republicans party.

This is basically just the campaign advisors trying to get as much money into the campaigns as possible, because they get a cut of every ad buy. They're not interested in making things better for the people, just looking at their bottom line.

[–] tiredofsametab@fedia.io 16 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

I'd like a list of those who subscribe to this theory to ensure not a single one of them ever gets a vote from me again. I'm an overseas voter and my "home" state is so gerrymandered to shit it doesn't really matter what I do anyway.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 24 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

What's not mentioned in this excerpt is that this was sponsored by Third Way, a think tank that is singlemindedly devoted to convincing Democrats to cut the left out of the party. God knows the DNC has its problems, but it's misleading to frame this as a mainstream Democratic conference.

"Moderates say party should go moderate" shocker

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Mud@sh.itjust.works 7 points 14 hours ago

A convent of dems in Virginia attempting to revive Jimmy Carter.

[–] cybervseas@lemmy.world 105 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

The…dominance of small-dollar donors? I wish.

[–] AstridWipenaugh@lemmy.world 52 points 21 hours ago (4 children)

If the small donors are dominating... Why would you abandon them?

[–] OutForARip@lemmy.ca 25 points 20 hours ago

Because they’re not giving the bribes that the big donors give. Politicians expect a high paying effortless lobbying job as reward for selling out their country.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] cybersin@lemm.ee 59 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

The "far left" has a disproportionate influence on policy and messaging?

What a joke.

They're going to use this defeat to blame progressives and Walz (who consistently had the highest favorability of anyone on either side of the race) instead of their conservative cop Kamala.

[–] jonne@infosec.pub 35 points 21 hours ago

They selected Walz because he was polling the best (because he talks like a normal person), and then they basically hid him because they didn't like what he said. Not sure if he did any interviews after the Jon Stewart one where he was slightly too honest about Liz Cheney.

[–] lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com 14 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (1 children)

A good bit of literature has studied the problem and arrived to recommendations that overlap in parts & depart in others with this playbook.

A former parliamentarian of the Hungarian government studied its slide into illiberalism, and suggested remedies for the current, similar trend in the US. Resist in the courts & media, and build a powerful social base at the state & city level throughout the country. The latter means

the Democratic Party must reconnect with the working class to preserve liberal institutions

Doing that means

  1. "creating new and strengthening existing local organizational structures, especially labor unions". Do not focus "on issues important to the active base only" such as "media freedom or democracy": this leads to "failures of mass mobilizations". "[E]ngage with [ordinary people] outside elections, focusing on issues that matter to them".
  2. "[T]o push through popular reforms that elites oppose", free "the party from elite capture" by shifting financing "from the corporate elite to small and micro-donations".
  3. "[C]ommit to left-populist economic policies".
  4. "[L]earn symbolic class politics", "embrace the mundane and be down to earth".

you don’t protect democracy by talking about democracy — you protect democracy by protecting people

I'm seeing the playbook overlap a bit with points 1 & 4, diverge from point 2, and not treat point 3.

Another article reviews research observing a decades-long trend of class dealignment: workers abandoning the left-wing party & joining the right. As unions have weakened and Democrats abandoned them, the party has increasingly relied on & shifted appeal to urban middle class professionals & minorities. The review names 4 paths researched or discussed to reverse dealignment.

  • inclusive populism: "appeal to working-class voters’ sense of resentment at economic elites and stress how elites use racial resentment to divide segments of the working class that share a common interest in economic justice"
  • anti-woke social democ­racy: make "a clean break with factions of the party that embrace unpopular social and cultural messaging that alienates working-class voters"
  • deliverism: "pass and implement large-scale economic reforms that benefit working Americans"
  • institutionalism: reinvigorate a "labor movement capable of advancing working-class interest in politics and [re-embed] Democratic and progressive politics into the lived experiences of working-class communities"

It looks like the playbook is going with anti-woke social democ­racy & institutionalism, rejecting inclusive populism, not mentioning deliverism.

They seem to think the way to win the working class is to go more MAGA-like (anti-woke social democ­racy) instead of trying a competing strategy like inclusive populism. It also looks like they're choosing not to break free of elite capture, which seems like a huge mistake.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 31 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (52 children)

The blue MAGA are here on Lemmy and I ran into couple of them. They keep shouting to the rooftops that the Democratic party did nothing wrong and berate Trump voters as stupid and ignorant. But they are tone deaf when you point out that the Democratic party is not willing to run on the platform on Medicare-for-all, build more social housing and increase federal minimum wage (and ditch Israel), which made the party unappealing and lose consistently. Basically, blue MAGA don't want to go left, because even if they are socially progressive on issues, they benefit from wealth inequality because they themselves are affluent in spite of being socially progressive.

Edit: yep, the blue MAGA came out of the woodwork. They think Medicare for all, affordable housing, and increasing minimum wage are red fascism.

[–] jjagaimo@sh.itjust.works 5 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

"26 replies" but I cant see any of them because I have those kinds of idiots blocked

[–] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 3 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

I see that you have more experience of them than I do.

Turns out that the prominent posters, pugje$u$, is one of the blue MAGA.

load more comments (51 replies)
[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 5 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

This is Concern Trolling at its finest

Edit: Dear Downvoters, I mean the group that gave these terrible ideas is clearly a Right Wing fucker Concern Trolling, not OP

[–] notsoshaihulud@lemmy.world 23 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

I smell bullshit here, but yeah this is definitely a laundry list of exactly the stuff not to do. A moderate democrat is a Krysten Sinema and a Joe Manchin that exactly did a lot of damage to Democrats.

Also, owning up to democratic governance issues of large cities? Republicans run <20% of America's top 50 cities, and 10% of the top 30. Republicans are not in the business of running large cities, so WTF would give credence to them on a topic they literally have no expertise or relevant track record in doing.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 45 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

This is just the other half of the one party state

[–] Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world 34 points 21 hours ago (37 children)

Looks like it to me.

Moderates have done nothing but sell their America out for a seat at an empty table. How could anything good come from people who are currently in charge of the shit show called the DNC?

load more comments (37 replies)
[–] ChicoSuave@lemmy.world 35 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

The rightwing coup within the DNC. Those staffers and consultants need to be blacklisted from politics. They have done nothing but drive the country into fascism.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›