this post was submitted on 28 Feb 2025
543 points (98.2% liked)

Technology

63313 readers
4499 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Firefox maker Mozilla deleted a promise to never sell its users' personal data and is trying to assure worried users that its approach to privacy hasn't fundamentally changed. Until recently, a Firefox FAQ promised that the browser maker never has and never will sell its users' personal data. An archived version from January 30 says:

Does Firefox sell your personal data?

Nope. Never have, never will. And we protect you from many of the advertisers who do. Firefox products are designed to protect your privacy. That's a promise.

That promise is removed from the current version. There's also a notable change in a data privacy FAQ that used to say, "Mozilla doesn't sell data about you, and we don't buy data about you."

The data privacy FAQ now explains that Mozilla is no longer making blanket promises about not selling data because some legal jurisdictions define "sale" in a very broad way:

Mozilla doesn't sell data about you (in the way that most people think about "selling data"), and we don't buy data about you. Since we strive for transparency, and the LEGAL definition of "sale of data" is extremely broad in some places, we've had to step back from making the definitive statements you know and love. We still put a lot of work into making sure that the data that we share with our partners (which we need to do to make Firefox commercially viable) is stripped of any identifying information, or shared only in the aggregate, or is put through our privacy preserving technologies (like OHTTP).

Mozilla didn't say which legal jurisdictions have these broad definitions.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 5 points 31 minutes ago

current acting CEO of Mozilla is Laura Chambers. An Australian native and has quite...interesting work history.

1000001226

It's weird isn't it? how these same names keep coming up again and again...

Ebay, Paypal, Airbnb.

she would have likely worked with Thiel and Musk during her time there. I wonder if there's any lingering commitment there?

[–] nthavoc@lemmy.today 8 points 56 minutes ago

I remember a time when Google wrote "Don't be evil" all over their stuff.....

[–] Solventbubbles@lemmy.world 1 points 1 minute ago

Son of a bitch I just got back into Firefox.

[–] FrostyCaveman@lemm.ee 3 points 35 minutes ago

Gahhhh this is horrible

I spent some time switching to Librewolf this morning but at the end of the day, it having Firefox as the upstream means it’s all fragile and tenuous anyway

[–] wuphysics87@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 hour ago

Several questions:

  1. How are they getting our data?
  2. What is the nature of the data?
  3. Can we do anything in about:config?
[–] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 20 points 2 hours ago

They can't just promise they "never will" and then get rid of it. People who used the service under the original agreement should still be able to claim that benefit since it was promising to never sell it.

[–] Xanza@lemm.ee 1 points 23 minutes ago (1 children)

I feel a little vindicated. I started using Firefox basically when it was first released. I migrated away from it after several years because I simply didn't like the direction that Mozilla was taking it. Decades later I see them struggling down the same inevitable path I figured they'd always head down from the beginning.

Firefox bros used to get ultra pissed at me for shitting on their browser because I just knew Mozilla would eventually fuck it all up. And here we are.

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 2 points 10 minutes ago

I’m not sure what you’re trying to say. I told ya so? I was smarter than everyone else and figured it out first?

FF has been one of the better full-featured browsers with generous amount of add-ons/plugins. There was no reason not to use it vs some less functional browser or some corporate data miner like Chrome. It still is, however some alternatives are catching up. Time will tell how it all shakes out as far as the battle between functionality, privacy, ad- and tracking-blockers, and people willing to build and maintain free browsers and plugins.

[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 27 points 4 hours ago

That clarification is not making me calm

[–] JuxtaposedJaguar@lemmy.ml 12 points 3 hours ago

Mozilla is trying to increase their revenue by doing everything other than improving Firefox

[–] bizzle@lemmy.world 26 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

I'm about to get my tattoo removed wtf

[–] KrapKake@lemmy.world 14 points 2 hours ago

Just get "RIP" tattooed under it.

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 18 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

If it's really you...

Wtf?

[–] bizzle@lemmy.world 5 points 3 hours ago

It is lmfao it was my first one 🥲

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 6 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Would you like to see my tattoo of Tom from MySpace I got on my left testicle? Hey man, in 2005 it seemed like MySpace Tom would be in our lives forever. Why WOULDN'T you get his profile picture inked into your body with needles on the most painful part of your body? It made sense in 2005!

But noooooooooo! Facebook had to be a dick. And now whenever I pull my pants down in front of some hot 20 year old with daddy issues, she's like "Is that your uncle or something?"

Meanwhile Tom sold my MySpace for hundreds of millions of dollars, and now does photography of bikini models on his yacht! While I have to explain who Tom is to Gen Z....

sigh

[–] outdated2139@lemmynsfw.com 3 points 3 hours ago

For a second I thought Tom did photography and bikini models on his yacht. We'll he probably does, but I just read your comment wrong.

[–] HipsterTenZero@dormi.zone 32 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

promises don't count if you delete them. everyone knows that

[–] LMurch@thelemmy.club 20 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

"If I put my wedding ring in my pocket, it's not cheating..."

This kind of thinking shouldn't be acceptable from a legal standpoint. Yet the courts do nothing...

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago
[–] parmesan@lemmy.world 9 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Am I the only one here who's pretty much okay with this? I do wish they'd clarify exactly what they mean by "Mozilla doesn't sell data about you (in the way that most people think about 'selling data')," but having my anonymized data sold so that Mozilla can continue to operate (combined with Firefox being the best browser I've used in terms of both performance and flexibility - ability to install add-ons from sources outside of the Mozilla store, for example) - seems like a worthy tradeoff to me.

They also have an option to opt-out of data collection, which I do wish was opt-in instead, but with the way every other mainstream browser operates I'm just happy the option is there at all. Let me know if there's something I'm missing here though.

[–] sem@lemmy.blahaj.zone 19 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

The problem I have with this is that "anonymized" data in the past has often been trivial to de-anonymize. And if they can remove some promises now, they're going to keep going in that direction. Just like Microsoft telemetry used to be less but is getting worse and worse.

[–] parmesan@lemmy.world 0 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Do you have any sources about anonymized data being easy to de-anonymize? I've been hearing a lot of conflicting stuff regarding the policy change so I wanna make sure the information I'm getting is accurate. But yeah if Firefox implements more anti consumer policies like this I will probably be jumping ship.

[–] sem@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 9 minutes ago (1 children)
[–] parmesan@lemmy.world 1 points 2 minutes ago

Thanks I'll read up on it :)

[–] grue@lemmy.world 99 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

Mozilla needs to understand that I don't want it to have my data to sell or not in the first place.

[–] OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca 9 points 4 hours ago

That's the thing that bothers me about all these companies now. My data is my data, not theirs. They shouldn't even be allowed to collect it, let alone sell it or give it to anyone who wants it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] HexadecimalSky@lemmy.world 151 points 9 hours ago (18 children)

I see it said agian and agian. because its true. Firefox is one of, if not the best of the mainstream browsers. (Not included its many forks) but Mozilla is a horrible caretaker of it. Mozilla does not focus on firefox and they dont care/believe in it nearly as much as its users or devs who fork it.

The motivations of a company are extremely important, and has Mozilla does not care for a lightweight, good, privacy centric browser, the enshitification will and has corrupt firefox.

It's only a matter of time until it is as bad as chromium or flat out joins it.

[–] afronaut@lemmy.cafe 6 points 5 hours ago (3 children)

Do Firefox forks allow us to avoid this enshittification or will they also be affected as well?

[–] Lem453@lemmy.ca 2 points 58 minutes ago

Is librewolf a good alternative? Most plugins seem compatible

[–] bdonvr@thelemmy.club 7 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

In theory yes. But remember that Chrome is based on Chromium which is open source. But nobody has stepped up to do a viable hard fork to take power away from Google.

Maintaining a modern browser is a huge undertaking which is why almost nobody except Google, Mozilla, and Apple are really even trying. Even Microsoft threw in the towel.

The more bad stuff is added to Firefox the harder it will be for any forks to keep up removing it while also keeping it up to date. Will anyone step up?

[–] morrowind@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 hours ago

Because it hasn't been needed. Alternatives like vivaldi and brave do make some changes to allow you to disable Google services. Ungoogled chromium is also a thing.

For all the hate, Google has mostly done fine beyond a few boneheaded decisions.

[–] wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 4 hours ago

Yes, they allow full avoidance of any potential data collection through the browser, if they remove the collection features.

Mozilla would need to change their licensing terms to prevent forks from being able to remove things like that, and forks could just use the last version of the code before the license change and just backport new features.

Also Firefox is fully open source, unlike chromium which relies on a closed source binary blob in the middle. Some chromium forks have replaced the binary blob with open source code, but the default is for chromium forks to have a nice chunk in them controlled by google that no one can deeply inveatigate what it does. Firefox does not have this issue.

Mozilla can't hide any potential data collection in Firefox due to the full open source nature (unlike chrome forks). They also can't stop fork devs from stripping out any data collection functions. And as of today, they have not introduced any data collection that is not supremely anonymized, and they have not introduced any data collection that cannot be opted out of through the browser settings (and about:config).

load more comments (17 replies)
[–] drosophila@lemmy.blahaj.zone 51 points 8 hours ago

Since we strive for transparency, and the LEGAL definition of “sale of data” is extremely broad in some places, we’ve had to step back from making the definitive statements you know and love. We still put a lot of work into making sure that the data that we share with our partners (which we need to do to make Firefox commercially viable)

So in other words we sell your data and get paid for it, and some countries won't let us lie about it.

load more comments
view more: next ›