this post was submitted on 02 Mar 2024
140 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13687 readers
192 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] iByteABit@hexbear.net 54 points 1 year ago (11 children)

Wtf are "noncombat troops"?

[–] SerLava@hexbear.net 49 points 1 year ago

Troops in an """"""advisory"""""" and """"""training"""""" role stationed close to the front line who could of course defend themselves in the event of attack,

[–] D61@hexbear.net 44 points 1 year ago

Military Advisors janet-wink

[–] GarbageShoot@hexbear.net 32 points 1 year ago

Troops not involved in combat? Death to Canada, but it's a perfectly plausible thing to say. Medics, engineers, etc.

[–] Evilphd666@hexbear.net 25 points 1 year ago

Our superior recon tells Ukraine where to shoot boom boom we supply them with. Therefore bullshit we didn't "pull the trigger".

[–] AsLeftAsTheyCome@hexbear.net 25 points 1 year ago

They’re going do the same shit as the reddit volunteers, where every reddit-logo mercenary was claiming to be a “medic.”

[–] barrbaric@hexbear.net 24 points 1 year ago

Plausible deniability

[–] IsThisLoss@hexbear.net 20 points 1 year ago

little green men

[–] Tachanka@hexbear.net 15 points 1 year ago

a convenient excuse to escalate

[–] iridaniotter@hexbear.net 15 points 1 year ago

Sacrificial lambs perhaps

[–] 420blazeit69@hexbear.net 14 points 1 year ago

We should not for a second believe "oh we're not going to send anybody who'd directly harm anyone," but I believe most military personnel do not directly fight. Support/logistics needs are immense.

[–] Egon@hexbear.net 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Combat troops with extra steps