this post was submitted on 18 Jul 2025
472 points (95.4% liked)

World News

48511 readers
2667 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

They may look like travel shampoo bottles and smell like bubblegum, but after a few hundred puffs, some disposable, electronic cigarettes and vape pods release higher amounts of toxic metals than older e-cigarettes and traditional cigarettes, according to a study from the University of California, Davis. For example, one of the disposable e-cigarettes studied released more lead during a day’s use than nearly 20 packs of traditional cigarettes.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] anarchy79@lemmy.world 13 points 18 hours ago

YOU HEARD'EM FOLKS! GO GET YOUR CIGARETTES!

[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 8 points 18 hours ago

All they had to do was keep it quiet for 15 years until the new generation was addicted.

Remember when e-cigarettes looked like cigarettes, and were for a brief time allowed to be smoked indoors in public? That's how it started, we were told they were completely healthy, and a way to "kick the habit", because it's "just a habit", not one of the strongest addictions you'll ever encounter, according to the people who make millions off of it.

[–] elfin8er@lemmy.world 1 points 13 hours ago

Esco Bar, Flum Pebble, and ELF Bar for anyone curious.

[–] TheLunatickle@lemmy.zip 21 points 1 day ago

I wonder if this is part of why gen Z is turning conservative.

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 9 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Guess I'm gonna be ultra fucked. I'm not going back to cigarettes. And I already quit nicotine once for seven and a half years. Starting again was the biggest mistake of my life cause I don't wanna go through that again. Oh well, it's not like we have much chance at a future anyway.

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 day ago

Dude, I hope you try to quit those too. If you've ever met someone who can't breathe from COPD, it's a tough time for them.

[–] Emerald@lemmy.world 74 points 1 day ago (3 children)
[–] anarchy79@lemmy.world 2 points 18 hours ago

IT'S A NATURAL PLANT

lol

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Grizzlyboy@lemmy.zip 58 points 1 day ago (5 children)

I can’t fathom how they’re legal. Disposable e cigarettes? The waste is insane, and the people using then aren’t properly disposing of them either..

[–] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

There needs to be a $20 deposit on them that you get back when you turn in the empty vape.

Or, hot take, make vapes you can refill.

[–] UnfortunateShort@lemmy.world 8 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

There are ones you can refill, the disposable ones should just be banned altogether.

[–] cmbabul@lemmy.world 2 points 17 hours ago

The ones you could refill were the only game in town at the beginning, only thing I ever used. Need to get back on flower for weed but the cartridges are super convenient, at least they don’t have batteries(I know there are disposable weed vapes, not the same as the cartridges)

[–] only_in_ohio@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago

This. So much effort being put into regulating zero-waste bags and attached bottle cups yet those vapes fly under the radar

Because the Trump and Biden FDA banned everything else already. Now they want to ban whats left in order to push people back toward cigarettes which can still be purchased at every gas station, grocery or convenience store in the country.

[–] Darleys_Brew@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They aren’t in the UK, technically, but manufacturers get around it by making them rechargeable.

I’ve read about people that don’t bother recharging them, though.

[–] Grizzlyboy@lemmy.zip 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Have you seen the Brit who made a bicycle battery from disposable ecigs?

He’s the one who made me aware of it, and made me contact political parties about their stance on them.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=VcVp9T8f_W4&pp=ygUgRGlzcG9zYWJsZSBlIGNpZ2dhcmV0dGVzIGJpY3ljbGU%3D

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Eww@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] anarchy79@lemmy.world 3 points 18 hours ago

It's so fucked that every single actor in the Marlboro commercials died of lung cancer. All of them.

[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 1 points 16 hours ago

I swapped off vapes back to American Spirits after finding this study lol.

Marlboro reds are really tasty, but i know they're horrible for you as far as cigarettes go.

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 101 points 2 days ago (36 children)

The three "brands" they tested are all from the same outfit, who most certainly sources them all from the same sweatshop in China. This does not apply to all disposables by any stretch. There's plenty of better reasons to dunk on disposables.

load more comments (36 replies)
[–] Squiddork@lemmy.world 29 points 2 days ago (5 children)

If you read the paper, it assumes a 100% absorption rate of the heavy metals emitted.

I'm not here to defend vapes but I think that is a seriously overlooked flaw in this study. Most people don't puff a cigarette/vape and hold it in their lungs until it's completely absorbed.

Couldn't see anything about the bioavailability of these carcinogens via lungs factored into the absorption rate either.

Ontop of that the sample size from this study is abysmal and from the same manufacturer and there is also a declared conflict of interest.

IMO more studies need to be done before we can conclusively determine the damage and risks of disposable vapes.

[–] lechekaflan@lemmy.world 1 points 21 hours ago

Some of the studies on smoking I've seen were less about understanding how and why people consume tobacco and recommend alternatives, and more like echoing the old practices and beliefs of the temperance movement, which considers tobacco and alcohol as archenemies of humanity. That anytime there's someone publicly declaring they quit smoking, it's followed with praises which at times reminiscent of a tent revival.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›