this post was submitted on 07 Jul 2025
74 points (100.0% liked)

Ask Lemmy

33137 readers
1398 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

If you have investments, let’s treat those as liquid cash for the sake of argument. Otherwise, the assumption is that you’re not selling property or possessions, but continuing to live as you do now.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] stoy@lemmy.zip 4 points 9 hours ago

About a year.

[–] Allero@lemmy.today 3 points 14 hours ago

About a month should be covered

[–] Thoven@lemdro.id 7 points 18 hours ago

Right now, until next month's mortgage payment comes due. Every time I get something in the emergency fund either an emergency happens or a maintenance that will be an emergency if ignored. Just ordered a new set of car tires about an hour ago, as it happens.

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 5 points 19 hours ago

1-2 years before I need to look at selling the house, although hoping that the mortgage will drop when our 2 year fix ends which could push that time up a bit as that is by far my largest expense.

[–] Opinionhaver@feddit.uk 42 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I just ran the numbers for the first time ever, and it adds up to 34 months - which I realize is a pretty privileged place to be. However, I’m by no means rich; I just live well below my means and invest all my savings.

[–] helmet91@lemmy.world 23 points 1 day ago (3 children)
[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 5 points 19 hours ago

I used to rent a single bedroom in an overcrowded house share, didn't learn to drive because I couldn't afford it.

Had over a year of expenses saved, hardly makes you rich.

[–] Opinionhaver@feddit.uk 17 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Depends on who I compare myself to and how one defines “rich.” To me, it means someone whose passive income exceeds their spending - and I’m nowhere even close to that… yet.

[–] TheOneCurly@feddit.online 18 points 1 day ago

Yeah I think that's where the distinction between rich and wealthy comes in. You still have to work for a living and are closer to homelessness than renting out Venice for a wedding (for instance).

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 1 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (1 children)

This exact question from this thread is how rich are you and 34 months is quite wealthy.

It’s an important distinction where I’m a potential counter example. I admit it. I earn what ought to be a comfortable living but poor choices in the past (and probably still) mean that I’m only a couple months from financial disaster. And since it would affect my kids education and my old age, the affects would be major. I am clearly not wealthy, mostly due to my own choices

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 6 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (1 children)

Surely it depends how you live though. A guy spending just £15 a week on food and living in a tent is not wealthy just because they have £2k in the bank which will cover them for a few years.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world -1 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

That’s a bit of an edge case but why not? If they earn enough to live the way they want, are secure from immediate financial catastrophe, and can afford some luxuries, then maybe they are wealthy, despite being subsistence

Meanwhile someone can earn a nice fat six figure salary but be over mortgaged for house and car, not living comfortably, and paycheck to paycheck on the edge of financial disaster. They’re poor, despite it being by their poor choices

Wealth is freedom from want and financial anxiety

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 day ago

I'm in my mid 40's.

It's not particularly uncommon for people in regional Australia to own their own house with no mortgage by my age.

It's pretty tough to find a family home that costs less than 10x average wage.

So, as a kind of line in the sand I'd say maybe a third of 45 year olds living in regional Australia could "survive" for 10 years with no income.

[–] Mothra@mander.xyz 5 points 1 day ago (3 children)

How do you know how to invest? Asking for a friend.

[–] Opinionhaver@feddit.uk 21 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I don’t. I do it the boring way - buying cheap, highly diversified ETF index funds.

[–] HurlingDurling@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

That's way more than most people know... Also, wtf is an ETF?

[–] AFLYINTOASTER@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago
  1. Open a Vanguard account.
  2. Buy as much of the thing called VOO as you can each month.
  3. Come back at retirement age to oodles of money.
[–] TheOneCurly@feddit.online 5 points 1 day ago

Mutual funds and ETFs are both types of investments that represent a group of individual stocks and are generally managed in some way, either by a person or by a fixed algorithm. Mutual funds have some tax implications that can by annoying for people so ETFs tend to be preferred for taxable accounts (in the US at least).

[–] Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 day ago

Buy into a broad market tracking ETF (something that tracks s&P 500 or 1000 or similar). That way you're not betting on individual companies, your betting on the collective largest companies in the world doing well. Over a long period of time, which for over a century has averaged ~7% inflation adjusted return yearly.

[–] Railcar8095@lemmy.world 3 points 19 hours ago

Cash only, about 6 months. Selling assets, 20 years.

13 years ago I had to walk 2 hours after work to get home because I didn't have a pounds to rent a bike (it was a bank holiday and salary was delayed for a day). My family helped me expanding my education and since things skyrocketed.

[–] LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

3 months at the absolute most, likely significantly less, even after cutting out all "luxuries" like paying for internet/phone/electricity/water.

70% of that would go on rent for my 1-bed flat. And no - I don't live in a big city. I earn more than most. I spend less than most. I don't use any subscription services and I pirate everything. I don't drink, and I never go out to pubs, cinema, (insert paid activity here) because all of that is way too expensive.

The UK is fucked.

Literally the only thing that decides how long I can live is whether or not you rent - whatever you do or don't do as personal responsibility practically does not matter unless you own a house.

The small variations in rent price are also irrelevant, I used to pay more for less, in the grand scheme of things the variance only amounts to £100-200 per year and usually depends on how much you can tolerate free penicillin on the walls.

The blame is only on boomers who hoard property, jack up rents and collect benefits from the gov't off worker taxes. Virtually no one else is to blame apart from capitalism more generally.

The same boomers will also soon elect the alt-right and things will get a lot worse and everywhere else seems to be on the same general trajectory.

I used to dream of a utopia like Star Trek. Now 28 days later looks like a utopia.

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 2 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

I earn less than average (£26k), live in the south, most of my hobbies are cheap though. Fair bit of outdoor stuff - touching grass is free.

The media really is pushing reform though, it's crazy how much press they get. The party that wants to remove your human rights..

[–] LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

I earn almost double and I can't say I have any hobbies that require spending money anymore, unless upskilling for work counts as a hobby.

Almost all of my hobbies are centered around spending less money, e.g. building an offline music collection to move off Spotify, homelab stuff to host navidrome & jellyfin to move off having any subscription services.

I did buy an acoustic guitar I've been absolutely in love with lately. Was pretty cheap for a guitar (£200) but that's something I suppose.

I was saving for a house but by the time I could afford even the shittiest mortgage I might have to flee the country and as such lose all the gains in my LISA. Might as well live a little I guess.

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Bought a house a couple of years ago, just as Truss fucked up the economy so my mortgage sucks. 2 year fix ends soon though so hopefully the rate will drop. Tempting to keep paying the same amount though as I know I am able to and then cut many years off it. Or perhaps even aim to pay a bit more and cut over a decade off. Reducing the size of the debt faster also should mean I can extend the payback period if I have financial issues and its not as much of a problem as there would be more time to work with.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 1 points 21 hours ago

I used to dream of a utopia like Star Trek.

Be careful what you wish for.

[–] Nikls94@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago

I’m still recovering from the mistakes I made 8 years ago, for another 3 years maximum, so no savings,

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 3 points 20 hours ago

A couple months, but

Basically I’ve been saving up for years to redo a leaky moldy bathroom. That wouldn’t get done. Maybe ever

I’ve saved what I could to pay for my kids college. I could ruin their entire future to stay alive

I’m coming up in retirement age with way too little savings. I’ve finally able to put aside enough to catch up a little bit I guess that would go pretty quickly too

[–] Tattorack@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago

The rest of this month.

If im lucky its about 2 months.

[–] tankplanker@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Without cutting back at all, even my frivolous spending and holidays, about six months.

If i cut holidays and frivolous stuff, about twelve months.

If i cut back essentials, sold some stuff, eighteen to twenty four months. If on top i downsized the house, probably five years.

If i could make it to seven years then my private pension would kick in and I can retire. If the government hasn't already moved the age you can draw a private pension i could be retired already.

[–] Moose@moose.best 3 points 1 day ago

A month on current funds and maybe a couple more if I started selling off longer term assets.

[–] FancyPantsFIRE@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

Many years technically, but I doubt the stability of… well, everything, too much to say that with much conviction.

[–] NJSpradlin@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago
[–] Curiousfur@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

A month, maybe. I'd probably get arrested for squatting at work sooner, tbh. If I cut and run to the woods tonight, I could probably make it further, but I'll run out of food money faster than I could get a reliable food source going before winter hits

[–] JASN_DE@feddit.org 4 points 1 day ago

About a year.

[–] bluGill@fedia.io 2 points 1 day ago

I'm one of the lucky few who have a pension. I do not have enough savings to last until the pension kicks in, and in any case the pension is less than my current income, but I could live off my pension and social security alone.

[–] remon@ani.social 3 points 1 day ago

Around 4 months. But I could considerably decrease the rate of spending if that was an actual scenario, which would give me more like a year.

[–] cmoney@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

I could probably make it 6 months maybe slightly more, I don't spend a lot as it is and where I live has a relatively low cost of living.

[–] RBWells@lemmy.world 0 points 18 hours ago

I don't use my car much anymore, so would consider that liquid, and could make the kids pay some rent now they are working (not much), if I sold that and nothing in the house needed repaired or maintained (ha ha ha) I am at almost 3 years. So I guess if I had some fatal illness and was willing to run out all of both my &my husband's retirement money I could stop working. Well, no, nevermind, I couldn't, because the medical care would bankrupt us. But we would not immediately starve anymore. It only took half a century to get here!

[–] randombullet@programming.dev 2 points 1 day ago

About 30 months without any cutback on spending. Pure living costs is about 60 months.

[–] Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

About 4 months before I have to sell any assets. Then about 144 months, not including future growth of those assets before they're sold. But then I'm broke at nearly 50.

[–] Tracaine@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Buddy I live deep in the Appalachia mountains. I don't need money at all. All this technology and civilization bullshit is just a bonus for me, not a need.

[–] Nemo@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 day ago

Five months, but, three quibbles:

If I didn't have income I'd be cutting way back, and with only essential expenses it's more like eight.

I wouldn't plunder my retirement investments to keep spending at the current rate, so if I kept spending the same but didn't plunder, it's more like two months.

I started a good job recently after being underemployed for over a year, and am still financially recovering; normally my emergency budget covers ten months without any income.

load more comments
view more: next ›