this post was submitted on 06 Jul 2025
342 points (99.7% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

32966 readers
4620 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 38 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net 4 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Eh, if Michael Chrichton were still alive today he'd probably condone it all so long as he got his royalty check. Jurassic Park canon was never holy.

[–] kandoh@reddthat.com 15 points 2 hours ago

The premise of dinosaurs in the modern world is as close to evergreen as you can get. The problem isn't that the cow has gone dry, so much as the farmers keep jerking off the bull instead.

[–] justOnePersistentKbinPlease@fedia.io 35 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

There is a shifting of themes that basically tracks with the corporate takeover of the US government.

  1. (1993) Companies fucking around with systems they don't understand is the problem. Rich guy underestimates nature.
  2. (1997) Rich guy learned lesson. Corporate greed did not.
  3. (2001) post-dotcom crash: A rich fucker and his stupid family learn the lesson about the company that fucked with nature. Governments are bad for not interveneing.
  4. (2015) post-Birther: Company and its rich founder are naive and innocent. US Government and US education are the bad guys.
  5. (2018) Corporate suits are the good guys. Science is the bad guys.
  6. (2022) A (suddenly) European company is the bad guys. Science is again the bad guy. Americans are the good guys.
  7. (2025) The US company and Military are the good guys.
[–] OldManBOMBIN@lemmy.world 1 points 48 minutes ago* (last edited 47 minutes ago)

I do agree with the main point of your post; however, I feel that your reasoning is backwards.

Big blockbusters give the masses a dose of placebo. You see a movie where people who hold your values win, so you feel like it happened in real life, so you're less likely to make it happen in real life.

So I'm not spoiling this movie, look at the MCU instead: They defeated Thanos and stopped half the world's population from disappearing, and then we failed to properly fight COVID and Donald Trump gained power.

Now, I know correlation doesn't equal causation, and that there were other factors at play, but I also know that when you perceive the image of something, it activates the same neurons as actually seeing that thing - when you watch The Notebook or Armageddon, you feel the emotions of the characters in the film, and you cry.

That, combined with the other psychological tactics that we are constantly being bombarded with, make it difficult for us to navigate the world with a clear head. When you feel like you're winning, why would you fight?

And also, a TON of people are straight apathetic, and a lot more are just plain-old stupid. And there are dozens or hundreds of other factors such as personality of the audience, socioeconomics, religious beliefs, etc... that come into play here as well. It's not quite as cut-and-dry as "monkey see, monkey feels as though it has done," but that does play a large factor in it.

I typed all this but didn't proofread any of it, so I hope it makes sense. I'm sleepy.

[–] napkin2020@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Did you actually see the 2025 movie? No way the theme you got from that is US Corpo good. If anything g it's literally the opposite.

I didn't see anything else than 2025. Pretty bad.

But...(spoiler)But the main character literally decides to open-source the data instead of selling it to a pharma corp.

[–] altphoto@lemmy.today 3 points 1 hour ago

Jurassic, the pressure builds up!.....how the new oil fields get created from scratch.

[–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 24 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

if yeah want an amazing dinosaur park media, check out Dinosaur Sanctuary.

they treat the dinosaurs as animals, and the whole plot revolves around the upkeep of the zoo.

it was cowritten by a paleontologist and a manga artist.

that manga speaks to my soul as I worked in a zoo when I was 18 to 21. it really hits my nostalgia,

[–] Signtist@bookwyr.me 23 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

I saw the new one with my father in law today, after not having seen one since the original trilogy. It was just not good. I'm usually able to turn off my brain and enjoy a movie regardless of the quality, but there were so many things that didn't make sense, or were glossed over without explanation, that I just couldn't suspend my disbelief.

[–] EmpathicVagrant@lemmy.world 6 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

I’m sorry, new one? You mean from like 2019 right?

Right‽

[–] MedicPigBabySaver@lemmy.world 14 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

You know there's a new version out in the theaters, now. Right?

[–] FeatherConstrictor@sh.itjust.works 8 points 4 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Serinus@lemmy.world 2 points 50 minutes ago

Can we go back to "trilogy"?

[–] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 7 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

I’m looking forward to Jurassic Park 9: The Secrets of Dumbledore

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

it's just a gay porno with a dude in one of those memable T-Rex costumes

[–] Vespair@lemmy.zip 8 points 4 hours ago (3 children)

I saw the first Jurassic Park. I enjoyed it. But I feel sated with that single entry. If you love these movies, more power to you, but I don't really understand it myself.

[–] infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 hour ago

Lost World had some fun stuff (Despite diverging from it's book even worse than the first movie) but you're really not missing much, none of the sequels come within a mile the original.

I saw the first one, enjoyed it...not sure I could explain the plot or what happened in it. At the time having the dinosaurs brought to life was spectacle enough; they could have made a movie about the park working correctly and it would have sold tickets.

I watched the second and third one back to back with a girl. They were alright. I don't care to see them again. I'm not watching any more of them.

[–] atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 hours ago

The books, Jurassic Park and its sequel The Lost World, are very good and very different from the movies. I also recommend Disclosure by the same author.

[–] Honse@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

I saw it and it wasn't as bad as some of the other but not great. The big bad dies in like a single second with zero build up and its really unsatisfying. Weird character choices, unnecessary and forgetable characters mostly. The nerd guy "Harry" was the best actor for me. 6/10 not worth re-watching or thinking about again

[–] Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works 6 points 4 hours ago (3 children)

6/10 is a very high score considering that review.

[–] RazgrizOne@piefed.zip 3 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

That’s an F in the US education system almost everywhere (maybe everywhere barring specific curves?) and though we may think ill of them as a third world shithole that does mean something.

[–] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 3 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (2 children)
[–] TheLowestStone@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

65/100 is a D. Anything lower is an F.

[–] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago

Maybe where you went to school. I always had Fs at 59% and under… just like in Wikipedia’s article. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Academic_grading_in_the_United_States

I attended and worked in a couple schools in the states. I saw some alternatives like pass / fail and SBG, but whenever it was the A-F system, 60% was a D-

[–] RazgrizOne@piefed.zip 1 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)

Oh interesting. My schools were 69 and under was F. My understanding was 65 was a typical cutoff

[–] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

I would argue under 60 = F is the norm. It’s even quite a common trope in movies / TV. Example:

https://collider.com/the-simpsons-bart-gets-an-f/

[–] RazgrizOne@piefed.zip 2 points 2 hours ago

I actually did mean 60, just dat fingered the 5

[–] Honse@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 hours ago

It didn't make me groan from blatant plot holes or inconsistencies which is better than other movies in the franchise. Plus Industrial Light and Magic made those mutant Dinos look fuckin awesome.

[–] otacon239@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

They just work for IGN

[–] snausagesinablanket@lemmy.world 6 points 5 hours ago

Next week: Jurassic Petting Zoo!

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

Challenge: Let's broaden the Jurassic world. How do you make a Jurassic movie without the dinosaurs breaking loose?

[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 3 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

What if we remove the dinosaurs and make it about genetically modified super soldiers?

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 3 points 1 hour ago

With Kurt Russell!

Nice try, Universal

[–] FerretyFever0@fedia.io 2 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

I need a picture of Universal milking a T-Rex.

[–] JoShmoe@ani.social 2 points 2 hours ago (1 children)
[–] FerretyFever0@fedia.io 2 points 2 hours ago

Yeah, those udders are in a weird place. Hmm... Chernobyl T-Rex?