this post was submitted on 05 Jul 2025
172 points (97.8% liked)

politics

24592 readers
2763 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 36 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 5 points 17 hours ago

The only real antisemitic slur is one that hurts Netanyahu's feelings.

[–] notgivingmynametoamachine@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Shoot

Him

In

The

Face

[–] foofiepie@lemmy.world 50 points 1 day ago (5 children)

The word is “Shylock”, just to save you a click.

I had no idea that was a slur, but it makes sense I guess.

[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 6 points 23 hours ago

It sometimes is. The character Shylock was Jewish. He was also someone who loaned money at high interest rates.

Trump was talking about borrowing money, not about Jews. So in that context, probably not antisemitic. Though given the audience, it could be a dog whistle.

It's mostly a nothing burger.

So just another case of attacking Trump on something unimportant and diverting attention from the actual terrible things he's doing.

[–] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

Trump is well versed in the ancient arts of antisemitism.

[–] TheReturnOfPEB@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

But do you claim to be as smart as Trump claims to be ? Because it seems that smartest, biggest most beautiful brained leaders these days do not know Shakespearean references.

[–] markovs_gun@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I have noticed it's kind of common for older people to say this and not know the origins or antisemitic connotations. If someone who was Trump's age but a little bit smarter said this, I would think maybe it was intentional but since he's such an idiot there's a decent chance he really didn't know ot was offensive. As much as I hate Trump and all he stands for, I can believe this one was truly accidental.

[–] LadyButterfly@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

May well be, however he's calculating and manipulative. Wouldn't be at all surprised if it was deliberate.

[–] markovs_gun@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This one is just super common with old people not thinking through that it might be offensive though. Pretty much all my older relatives use this one occasionally and none of them would be intentionally anti-semitic. Trump isn't a god of manipulation or anything, he's an idiot who has the wealth and charisma to make everyone think he's not an idiot. By ascribing this intelligence and intention to him, you're kind of falling into right wing propaganda by unknowingly accepting the false premises they are selling to all of us. Trump is an idiot who doesn't think things through when he says them. His advisors do think things through and do have a lot more intelligence and intention to their words and actions, but Trump himself does not.

[–] LadyButterfly@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

I agree with you he definitely doesn't think things through. I also agree he's using a generational word. I personally think he's got anti social personality disorder and at the very least he's a documented dv abuser, they're manipulative. They can be thick as fuck, but with good manipulation skills

[–] the_crotch@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Any time you use a word for a racial/religious group that is not their own chosen preferred name (in this case "Jews" or "Hebrew"s) you're running a very high risk of stepping into slur territory. This isn't unique to older generations but they seem to have a harder time understanding it.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 2 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

I remember flinching when hearing older generations (like Greatest Generation and Silent Generation) using terms like getting "gypped" and having someone "jew them out" of something. Took me longer to figure out the gypped connection, but using Jew as a verb? Wow.

[–] the_crotch@sh.itjust.works 2 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (1 children)

When I was a kid, everyone was "fag". It was the go-to catchall insult. It's been hard to rewire my brain to stop doing that. So I kind of get it to an extent. If you never stop and think about these things they just seem normal.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 2 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

I remember those days. I also remember when people would call things/people "gay" as kind of a generic thing, even if it was not remotely about something that was actually gay, even into the 90s. As a kid, I remember a common game was called "smear the queer"....I also remember a common insult was calling someone a "woman", and "throwing like a girl" and so on. What a world. I suppose this kind of thing still goes on a lot, probably most behind closed doors? My parents never had a lot of tolerance for any of it, but they were definitely in the minority on saying anything about it where I grew up (very rural). My mother especially didn't go in for that misogyny stuff.

I honestly think a lot of people are so resistant to any change at all that requires even the lowest amount of effort (simply not using certain words) and these are some that voted for Taco in the hopes their lazy asses could go back to not having to keep this behind closed doors any more. These are the people that howled about "PC" in the 90s, bitched about Obama "fundamentally changing" America, whined about wearing a mask and getting vaccinated, and screeched about "DEI" and "CRT" and people being "woke" and others getting "cancelled". Some of them are surely hateful, but I also think a lot of them are just really fucking lazy. Not saying a word or a phrase when it's obviously hurtful? A bridge too far.

[–] the_crotch@sh.itjust.works 2 points 15 hours ago

That's really well put, I have no notes.

[–] JaymesRS@literature.cafe 13 points 1 day ago

For those unaware of the origin, It's a name of a Jewish moneylender character in The Merchant of Venice by Shakespeare.

[–] hopesdead@startrek.website 46 points 1 day ago (6 children)

Why must it be the Nazi who are supporting Israel?

[–] homura1650@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

Because ethnonationalism is a coherent ideology.

[–] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 52 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Because it's not about the Jews. It was never about the Jews. It was always about using a scapegoat that's enough of a minority to be bullied, but not enough of a minority that they practically don't exist.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 21 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Yep, but it's even more than that.

American Christian Zionism is not a pro-Jewish policy. It is about (a) getting rid of the Jews by getting them to all go back to the Holy Land, and more importantly, (b) triggering the "End Times," for which the Jews returning to the Holy Land is a prerequisite. American Christian Zionists do not give a flying fuck about Jews; they're just delusional racist death-cultists who think they're gonna get "Raptured."

[–] Droggelbecher@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

That first one isn't just American christian zionism, it's the literal reason modern day Israel was created.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 1 points 17 hours ago

Hey, according to their stupid death cult's myths, 144,000 Jews convert and are "saved", so....are they not merciful in their weird psychotic fantasies?

These people think they are the good ones, too. That's what so deranged. What they look forward to with much happiness, is having a front-row seat to eternal torture of others. That is so very sick and twisted. That's the mind of a person that would torture animals for fun. There is something wrong with this mindset. This kind of thing almost makes me wish for a world like Greg Bear's Queen of Angels where people like this are fixed.

[–] Eldritch@piefed.social 19 points 1 day ago

Because nationalist groups when they aren't pitted against each other have a lot in common. It's why Trump likes Bibi, Xi and Putin.

Wealthy German Zionists, negotiated Haavara with Hitler. Breaking solidarity and boycotts against his regime to emigrate to Palestine. Ostensibly to save German Jews. Though ultimately only those that were Zionist and wealthy got to take much advantage of it.

Post war Zionists manipulated international sympathies to make official claims to Palestine and seize control from the people who had actually lived there generations, displacing them. Much as Hitler had done to them. Initially there were many other places discussed to relocate many Jews after the war. It wasn't always just Palestine. But the nationalists demanded Palestine.

Nationalist are scum and always have been.

fash support fash

[–] Jerb322@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

What was it? Something about being the "good guy" so long, you become the "bad guy"

[–] vivalapivo@lemmy.today 3 points 1 day ago

Nazis were to found an Israel county on Madagascar.

[–] alexc@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I don’t know why people are surprised by this.its not his first time and we all know he’s never read a book in his life.

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 19 points 1 day ago (2 children)

we all know he’s never read a book in his life.

That's what I came to say, too. Not only does he not read, but he's not smart enough to remember the character nor understand the implications. We know he hasn't read a lick of Shakespeare. So where the fuck else would he know this term from other than antisemitism?

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Didnt his ex wife say he used to keep a copy of Mein Kampf that he himself said he liked to read because he admitted his speeches. Never read it, so it could be possible the term was learned from that

[–] ultranaut@lemmy.world 2 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

It was a collection of Hitler's speeches, not Mein Kampf.

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 2 points 19 hours ago

That makes sense, apparently I typed admitted instead of admired as well. Never studied his speeches either. While one would think speeches wouldn't include slurs, hard to say when the writer is going for the whole racial cleansing thing.

[–] logicbomb@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's possible that one of his antisemitic speech writers wrote the line for him.

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Possible, but if there's one thing that's been shown about Trump during his life in the media, it's that he has a near encyclopedic knowledge of all the racist slurs. He pulls out some real obscure ones, and that was even before he even ran for office.

[–] vivalapivo@lemmy.today 3 points 1 day ago

He's a genius and you have a coffee date, mate

[–] logicbomb@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

On the other hand, Trump plead ignorance, and I would never bet against his ignorance.

And, if he did know the slur, I'd be surprised that we haven't heard it until now. As you know, he's not shy about saying them.