this post was submitted on 27 Jun 2025
297 points (98.7% liked)

News

30499 readers
3104 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Hedge-fund billionaire Bill Ackman plans to bankroll a New York City mayoral campaign, arguing that his affluent associates are poised to flood the election with money in an effort to defeat Democratic Socialist frontrunner Zohran Mamdani.

Ackman said he was “gravely concerned” because he believed the left-wing candidate’s policies would be disastrous, triggering an exodus of the wealthy that would endanger New York’s public services by hollowing out its tax base.

Arguing that his own support of President Trump would automatically disqualify anyone Ackman might put forward, the activist investor said he was making a public appeal: Anyone capable of taking down Mamdani in the Nov. 4 election should step forward and volunteer.

“Importantly, there are hundreds of millions of dollars of capital available to back a competitor to Mamdani that can be put together overnight (believe me, I am in the text strings and the WhatsApp groups) so that a great alternative candidate won’t spend any time,” he wrote.

“So if the right candidate would raise his or her hand tomorrow, the funds will pour in.”

It’s unclear whether New Yorkers would honor such a candidate. The recent intervention by Elon Musk in Wisconsin’s state supreme court election indicated the voting public does not always respond well to billionaires using their money to sway races.

New York mayoral races are notoriously unpredictable due to the city’s chronically low turnout. In 2017, for example, Bill de Blasio won reelection with only 14% of registered voters coming out to support him.

A large influx of New Yorkers heading to the voting booth because they are as concerned as Ackman could easily affect the outcome. If Cuomo can hold on to enough fundraisers, political pundits also point out, it’s possible he could run as an independent like Adams, splitting the left vote and spoiling the race.

Ackman, however, argued all these factors would support the emergence of a centrist candidate looking to position themself on the national stage. It could even be another businessman like Bloomberg, he suggested, although Ackman in an earlier post appeared to indicate he would not seek to run himself.

“For the aspiring politician there is no better way to get name recognition, build relationships with long-term donors, and to showcase oneself,” the hedge fund manager wrote, pitching the campaign like a business deal. “The risk/reward of running for mayor over the next 132 days is extremely compelling as the cost in time and energy is small and the upside is enormous.”

(page 2) 26 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] nulluser@lemmy.world 24 points 10 hours ago

He wants to flood the FPTP ballot with progressive and centrist candidates so that those votes are spread so thin, the single conservative candidate is a shoe in with a landslide 3% of the votes.

[–] DancingBear@midwest.social 7 points 8 hours ago

The wealthy can leave… nobody cares… if they don’t want to live in a nice city they can easily afford to move.

[–] Asafum 16 points 9 hours ago

FOR SALE: NYC MAYOR

Price: Name your price.

Seller information: The putrid scum that a weeks worth of soaking in bleach wouldn't remove the stench from.

[–] frustrated_phagocytosis@fedia.io 15 points 10 hours ago

Ackman wants more Luigi in his NYC I guess

[–] shittydwarf@sh.itjust.works 13 points 9 hours ago

I'm gravely concerned that billionaires are allowed to exist

[–] Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works 8 points 9 hours ago

I mean if money is all you need to win an election is it really an election? These people are fuckin ghouls.

[–] snf@lemmy.world 8 points 9 hours ago

Gentlemen, this is plutocracy manifest!

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 5 points 8 hours ago

He could use some of that money for more immediate good. Start paying off people's school debt. Build housing. Whatever.

[–] professormarshmallow@lemmy.cafe 4 points 8 hours ago

More like Bill Ickman

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 9 hours ago

Bill Ackman once again proves that he is a piece of shit.

[–] motor_spirit@lemmy.world 6 points 9 hours ago

This mother fucker claiming that wealthy are paying their share of taxes is jokes lmao and implying that the money actually is applied properly is also

[–] Onyxonblack@lemmy.zip 4 points 9 hours ago

Dinnertime! It's time to fucking eat and devour the Rich!

[–] apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world 4 points 9 hours ago

They are afraid of our collectivity. Billionaires should not be.

[–] NRay7882@lemmy.world 4 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

They can buy politicians and bribe people to vote for their candidate. When is a wealthy democrat going to start paying people to take it to the streets? The Gates, Buffets and Cubans in the US should fund a movement that would help support people who are registered, have a voting history and stand for the average American.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 6 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

There is no such thing. If you think Gates, Buffet, or Cuban is on your side, you've fallen for the propaganda.

[–] BrokenGlepnir@lemmy.world 2 points 9 hours ago

Oh! Me!Me! I swear I won't waste your money filming ads of me farting into a microphone. I don't live anywhere near New York so you don't have to worry about meeting me to do planning. I bet they'd love that.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›