this post was submitted on 27 Jun 2025
217 points (98.2% liked)

News

30499 readers
3061 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Hedge-fund billionaire Bill Ackman plans to bankroll a New York City mayoral campaign, arguing that his affluent associates are poised to flood the election with money in an effort to defeat Democratic Socialist frontrunner Zohran Mamdani.

Ackman said he was “gravely concerned” because he believed the left-wing candidate’s policies would be disastrous, triggering an exodus of the wealthy that would endanger New York’s public services by hollowing out its tax base.

Arguing that his own support of President Trump would automatically disqualify anyone Ackman might put forward, the activist investor said he was making a public appeal: Anyone capable of taking down Mamdani in the Nov. 4 election should step forward and volunteer.

“Importantly, there are hundreds of millions of dollars of capital available to back a competitor to Mamdani that can be put together overnight (believe me, I am in the text strings and the WhatsApp groups) so that a great alternative candidate won’t spend any time,” he wrote.

“So if the right candidate would raise his or her hand tomorrow, the funds will pour in.”

It’s unclear whether New Yorkers would honor such a candidate. The recent intervention by Elon Musk in Wisconsin’s state supreme court election indicated the voting public does not always respond well to billionaires using their money to sway races.

New York mayoral races are notoriously unpredictable due to the city’s chronically low turnout. In 2017, for example, Bill de Blasio won reelection with only 14% of registered voters coming out to support him.

A large influx of New Yorkers heading to the voting booth because they are as concerned as Ackman could easily affect the outcome. If Cuomo can hold on to enough fundraisers, political pundits also point out, it’s possible he could run as an independent like Adams, splitting the left vote and spoiling the race.

Ackman, however, argued all these factors would support the emergence of a centrist candidate looking to position themself on the national stage. It could even be another businessman like Bloomberg, he suggested, although Ackman in an earlier post appeared to indicate he would not seek to run himself.

“For the aspiring politician there is no better way to get name recognition, build relationships with long-term donors, and to showcase oneself,” the hedge fund manager wrote, pitching the campaign like a business deal. “The risk/reward of running for mayor over the next 132 days is extremely compelling as the cost in time and energy is small and the upside is enormous.”

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] AHamSandwich@lemmy.world 11 points 1 hour ago
[–] HotsauceHurricane@lemmy.world 7 points 1 hour ago

Sounds like he is a frightened douche-canoe. Fuck that guy.

[–] Revan343@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 hour ago

Somebody more left-wing than Mamdani has the chance to do something hilarious

[–] teawrecks@sopuli.xyz 4 points 55 minutes ago

It's wild that they billionaires are openly just saying "whoops, we can't be letting the people elect someone good for them, here let's fix that".

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 2 points 45 minutes ago

Hollowing out the tax-base? Of what? Billionaires who have turned tax evasion into a sports championship?

In most places in the world, tax is primarily paid by the working people, not by the rich.

Which obviously leaves them with to much money that they squander on anti-citizen political campaigns like this. When they have the money for bribery on that level, they have the money to pax taxes like everyone else.

[–] circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org 8 points 1 hour ago

by hollowing out its tax base

As if the wealthy pay taxes. GTFO with that BS.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmings.world 2 points 55 minutes ago

Okay, but Cuomo spent triple what Zohran spent, and got his ass kicked.

Tell you what, just distribute all that money to your employees, and the result of the election will be the same as if you blew it all on a loser.

[–] match@pawb.social 15 points 2 hours ago

Gimme a hundred million dollars to lose to Mamdani. Sounds like a cushy gig.

[–] rc__buggy@sh.itjust.works 21 points 2 hours ago (2 children)

You leaving NYC Ackman? Gonna take Wall St. with you?

Fuck off to Ireland, see if I care.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] RDAM_Whiskers@lemmy.ml 1 points 44 minutes ago

He can stuff all his money right up his ass

[–] Zenith@lemm.ee 3 points 1 hour ago
[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 113 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (2 children)

So kind of this guy to give Mamdani an incredible basis for an ad campaign. Like, for real, does this rich fuck not understanding that the vast majority of the American populace wants to see more blue shells? Honestly, how could it be more clear? All Zohran has to do is something like:

There’s an old proverb that says you should judge a person by the enemies they’ve made. Well, I’ve made an enemy of the billionaire Bill Ackman, and he’s pledged a blank check to whoever runs against me. But, there’s good news: votes decide elections, not money. I’m not listening to the money. I’m listening to the voters. I’m listening to you. Let’s win this together.

[–] MelodiousFunk@slrpnk.net 16 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Ok where can I find a crochet blue shell because that’s pretty rad

[–] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 13 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah. Mr. Mangione would be the only person who I think of who could be competitive against Mamdani, on a campaign to "deny, defend, depose" corrupt billionaires and corporations from NYC.

Lmao holy shit, could you imagine if the other Mario brother gets acquitted and then Mamdani gets him to sign on as some sort of high-level city official? Honestly, considering the caliber of human that the current regime is appointing at the national level, we could do a damn sight worse than “some random engineer who got thrust into the spotlight, likely framed, and is now the patron saint of Healthcare as a Human Right”

[–] MeekerThanBeaker@lemmy.world 168 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

Billionaires are against Mamdani, eh? Something tells me he is the right guy for the job then.

[–] fluxion@lemmy.world 25 points 5 hours ago

Surely this billionaire Trump supporter cares about the interests of democratic voters

[–] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 17 points 5 hours ago

Surely, the billionaires have the common people’s best interests at heart, right?

Right?!?!

[–] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 52 points 5 hours ago

A billionaire just causally announcing that he can influence, finance and promote an election using his money in order to get what only interests themselves ... rather than in allowing democratic processes elect someone the people actually want and need.

[–] Empricorn 123 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Billionaires are scared. That's a good sign ..

[–] ObtuseDoorFrame@lemm.ee 8 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

What's super ironic to me is that taxing them actually makes them safer because if they pay their fair share people wouldn't want to murder them as much as they do now.

[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

They think they can buy enough guards to keep this from happening to them.

[–] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 55 points 5 hours ago

This is the biggest endorsement Mamdani could get. I hope New Yorkers are paying attention.

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 73 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Ackman said he was “gravely concerned” because he believed the left-wing candidate’s policies would be disastrous, triggering an exodus of the wealthy that would endanger New York’s public services by hollowing out its tax base.

wtf? Is this really the route they're going to take? I know, pay your fucking share of taxes and then there wouldn't be a "hollowing out."

[–] CorruptCheesecake@lemmy.world 37 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

If it's a choice between hollowing out the billionaire population or the middle class, I choose the billionaires.

[–] joyjoy@lemmy.zip 23 points 4 hours ago

It's not like they were paying taxes to begin with.

[–] besselj@lemmy.ca 85 points 6 hours ago

Billionaires should not exist.

[–] thefartographer@lemm.ee 46 points 5 hours ago

Billionaires hate him, genocide enablers hate him, fascists hate him, Nazis hate him, government criminals hate him, citizen concerned for fellow citizens love him.

This Texan Jew is about to send some donations to a Yankee antisemite.
*references to antisemitism are sarcasm based on comments from people who apparently loooove fascism*

[–] phoenixarise@lemmy.world 42 points 5 hours ago

People of NYC: your vote is far more powerful than this dude throwing his lunch money at the opposition.

[–] DancingBear@midwest.social 7 points 3 hours ago

The wealthy can leave… nobody cares… if they don’t want to live in a nice city they can easily afford to move.

[–] evenglow@lemmy.world 44 points 6 hours ago

Huh. I wonder why he just doesn't vote for the other person. Isn't that how it's supposed to work? Isn't that what poor people do? I was told voting was important... /s

[–] AmazingAwesomator@lemmy.world 27 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

why vote when legal bribes work this well?

[–] usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml 32 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)

Because they massively outspent Zohran in the primary and still lost. Vote because you can still overcome this. They want us to give up and think we can't. Don't do their dirty work for them

[–] DancingBear@midwest.social 4 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Wow they outspent him by 4:1?

[–] usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Yep, and even larger can be overcome too. If you look AOC's 2018 primary upset, she was outspent by over 10x

Insane outspending can be overcome. Obviously it makes the fight harder, but money is not everything

[–] Asafum 19 points 5 hours ago

Always vote, despair after. Don't hand them an easy win.

[–] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 24 points 6 hours ago

Zohran should drop a diss track collab with Kendrick on Spotify. No amount of billionaire money could combat that.

[–] very_well_lost@lemmy.world 16 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

Ackman said he was “gravely concerned” because he believed the left-wing candidate’s policies would be disastrous, triggering an exodus of the wealthy that would endanger New York’s public services by hollowing out its tax base.

Fake fucking news. Well all know the wealthy don't pay taxes.

[–] MushuChupacabra@lemmy.world 15 points 5 hours ago

Tl;dr: New Yorkers should elect Zohran Mamdani as their mayor, and should re-elect him as long as he chooses to serve.

Got it. Locked in. Never been clearer.

Thanks Bill Ackman!

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 5 points 4 hours ago

He could use some of that money for more immediate good. Start paying off people's school debt. Build housing. Whatever.

[–] nulluser@lemmy.world 21 points 6 hours ago

He wants to flood the FPTP ballot with progressive and centrist candidates so that those votes are spread so thin, the single conservative candidate is a shoe in with a landslide 3% of the votes.

[–] Asafum 13 points 5 hours ago

FOR SALE: NYC MAYOR

Price: Name your price.

Seller information: The putrid scum that a weeks worth of soaking in bleach wouldn't remove the stench from.

[–] professormarshmallow@lemmy.cafe 4 points 4 hours ago

More like Bill Ickman

[–] Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works 8 points 5 hours ago

I mean if money is all you need to win an election is it really an election? These people are fuckin ghouls.

[–] snf@lemmy.world 8 points 5 hours ago

Gentlemen, this is plutocracy manifest!

[–] shittydwarf@sh.itjust.works 12 points 5 hours ago

I'm gravely concerned that billionaires are allowed to exist

load more comments
view more: next ›