this post was submitted on 02 Jun 2025
64 points (98.5% liked)

Dungeons and Dragons

12149 readers
2 users here now

A community for discussion of all things Dungeons and Dragons! This is the catch all community for anything relating to Dungeons and Dragons, though we encourage you to see out our Networked Communities listed below!

/c/DnD Network Communities

Other DnD and related Communities to follow*

DnD/RPG Podcasts

*Please Follow the rules of these individual communities, not all of them are strictly DnD related, but may be of interest to DnD Fans

Rules (Subject to Change)

Format: [Source Name] Article Title

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 16 points 3 days ago (4 children)

action-adventure game

I feel like taking an extremely turn based game and making it "action adventure" is a weird choice. BG3 was a mega smash hit and turn based. If you want to funnel more players into your tabletop game, you probably want the video game to be kind of sort of like the tabletop. I have doubts about this.

[–] fhein@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

If you want to funnel more players into your tabletop game

I'm pretty sure Hasbro/WotC's only goal is to funnel more money into their bank accounts :D

You can compare with Games Workshop, who also created extremely turn based games in the past but later licensed their IP for all sorts of games, from strategical turn based ones to fast action shooters. I don't see any reason why an action adventure game would be more likely fail just because it's set in the D&D world, or why this would have any negative impact on sales of either the TTRPG or other licensed computer games like BG3.

[–] bjoern_tantau@swg-empire.de 16 points 3 days ago

BG3 was cheating. They had love and passion for the work they were producing. As if anything like that can be found at Wizards or Hasbro.

[–] redhorsejacket@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago

First and foremost, I understand and share your skepticism, but I attribute it more to Hasbro/Wizards of the Coast being terrible stewards of the brand moreso than the game's genre. They've proven to be anti-consumer ghouls with nearly every decision they've made (many of which have needed to be walked back or apologized for in the wake of massive backlash) over the past couple of years. So, in light of that context, it's only natural to assume this game is being made to chase some "casual gamer" money, rather than passion for DnDs various settings or mechanics.

As a counterpoint to the above, however, turn based gameplay is an abstraction used to make running the game easier for DMs. In the "reality" of the game world, all of the actions taking place in a round occur roughly simultaneously within a 6 second window. While my meat-based brain can't handle adjudicating multiple dice rolls a second, my CPU absolutely can, and therefore you could, potentially, play a highly faithful version of DnD in a real time environment if the CPU is just rolling the dice in the background. In fact, this is basically what Real Time with Pause systems offer, such as the first couple Baldur's Gate games (or many other cRPGs which emulate those).

Furthermore, the Dark Alliance games (1 and 2, not the recent live service game which is emblematic of the exact sort of decisions by Hasbro et al which leads us both to be highly suspicious of this project) are a lot of fun despite only being tangentially related to DnD. Getting something of comparable quality (with minimal GAAS nonsense), would make me pleased as punch.

[–] Zorque@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Yeah, but it's less risk and has more potential reward if you just follow trends and algorithms. You can always change your tabletop to fit more in line with the video games!

[–] Don_alForno@feddit.org 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

How many turn based goty candidates do we need until it becomes a trend?

[–] Zorque@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Enough so that they're not fun anymore.

[–] Don_alForno@feddit.org 1 points 1 day ago

Huh, in AAA terms you do have a point there.

a new single player d&d game

😊

it's from wotc/hasbro

🫠

[–] Fiivemacs@lemmy.ca 11 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Multiplayer is fine,just let us host our own games with friends. I do not want to play games with randoms or be forced online. It's also always amazing when singleplayer is there as well so I'm not knocking si gleplayer only, but the choice is always better.

[–] cosmicrookie@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

Dude.. they are voices! They dont exist. Nobody has old school IRL friends any more

[–] testfactor@lemmy.world 10 points 3 days ago (4 children)
[–] CommanderCloon@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 days ago

Baldur's gate 3 2

[–] _druid@sh.itjust.works 15 points 3 days ago

The headline says new. BG3 already came out. Help is out there.

[–] RegularJoe@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago

First paragraph says

“Dungeons & Dragons” IP owner Wizards of the Coast is moving on from its “Baldur’s Gate” video game franchise with a new single-player action-adventure game set in the world of the popular tabletop fantasy roleplaying game.

[–] Tikiporch@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

Yes. Baldurs Gate 3. That's right.

[–] SolidShake@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago