this post was submitted on 09 May 2025
40 points (95.5% liked)

politics

23387 readers
3784 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 5 points 1 hour ago

JD Vance says "We have no idea what's going on and are too busy robbing people"

[–] conditional_soup@lemm.ee 10 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

We don't need to be inserting our military or projecting power into this. I would like to see us broker a lasting peace without lobbying for national self interest. It'd probably be a good idea to offer to work with China here, as I seriously doubt that they want to see a nuclear exchange happen next door. This war won't help anyone, especially if nukes get involved.

But, then again, I think this puts us a bit ahead of schedule for the post-nuclear horror, right? Too bad we couldn't get Irish re-unification first.

[–] Vorticity@lemmy.world 4 points 2 hours ago

How about if we just act in the oligarchy's best interests? I bet a war between India and Pakistan would increase weapons sales and they might even want Starlink! Good for everyone who matters!

[–] superkret@feddit.org 7 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

I would like to see us broker a lasting peace without lobbying for national self interest.

The times when the US was in a position to act as neutral-ish arbitrator are long gone.

[–] conditional_soup@lemm.ee 2 points 3 hours ago

Yeah, I know. I'd still like to see it because I want to believe that we can have nice things.

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 51 points 6 hours ago

"We can't pick a side, they both look kinda brown"

[–] adespoton@lemmy.ca 9 points 4 hours ago

Meanwhile, Marco Rubio is intervening….

[–] Lucky_777@lemmy.world 18 points 5 hours ago

This is fine. Don't get into more conflicts. But if you want to be isolationist, then pull out everywhere. Pull put of all foreign bases.

JD is such a Trump cock sucker man. Can't wait till his political life is over.

[–] aarRJaay@lemm.ee 3 points 3 hours ago

Neither of them have anything Trump wants so he won't intervene.

[–] School_Lunch@lemmy.world 15 points 5 hours ago

As good as admitting that the US is no longer a superpower. You can't be isolationist and a superpower at the same time.

[–] TheAlbatross@lemmy.blahaj.zone 15 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

Back in my yoof we traded nuclear technology for mangos with India and those mangos were sweet, I tell ya what

[–] adarza@lemmy.ca 7 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

translation: "lol. like anyone's gonna listen to us anymore."

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 3 points 4 hours ago

I mean fair enough tbh; it is none of America's business as long as nukes don't fly.

[–] KMAMURI@lemmy.world 4 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)

Nothing good to extract, too many people to occupy farmland, the Brits already took all the good stuff and the water tends to be shit. Not worth recolonizing. There is always cheap labor I suppose. Must not be enough draw.

Trump says if there's anything he can do to help end the conflict to let him know.

Vance says they are staying out of it.

Makes you wonder if most of his administration just ignores what he says and sticks to Project 2025 until they are forced to listen to him to keep the public eye from noticing to much.

[–] ABetterTomorrow@lemm.ee 1 points 5 hours ago