this post was submitted on 08 May 2025
728 points (99.5% liked)

politics

23387 readers
3784 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

During a Senate hearing to review the FBI’s FY2026 budget request, Director Kash Patel was forced to admit that, despite the law requiring it, he had no such request ready to review.

This surprising development came during an awkward back-and-forth with Senator Patty Murray (D-WA), the ranking Democrat and Vice Chair of the Senate Appropriations Committee, which oversees and approves budget requests.

Senator Murray reminded the FBI Director that the budget request was legally required “last week,” and after the director responded, she surprisedly added, “And your answer is you just understand you’re not going to follow the law?”

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Regrettable_incident@lemmy.world 34 points 10 hours ago (3 children)

In the photo, the fucker looks like a little kid who didn't do his homework and got caught in the lie.

Hardly the brightest and the best.

[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 15 points 8 hours ago

My dog ate the budget!

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 33 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

Reminds me of the Office: "I thought this was a meet and greet".

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] minorkeys@lemmy.world 78 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

Why would any of Trump's administration care? None of them have been held accountable for anything, except to Trump.

[–] walktheplank@lemmy.world 9 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

The only people held to account in the US are the poor, disabled and non white.

[–] Tiger@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Hey us poor whites get screwed over too! It’s not a race war (only) - it’s a class war.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SchwertImStein@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

yeah, Trump was accountable af, given that he ia now thw president again

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] andyburke@fedia.io 257 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Hold him contempt or stop clutching your pearls.

[–] salacious_coaster@infosec.pub 177 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I'm sure Schumer will move quickly to form a search committee to form a task force with plans to complete a strongly worded letter by late 2027.

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world -3 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

As opposed to what? Asking DOJ to issue a warrant for the director of the FBI?

[–] Regrettable_incident@lemmy.world 12 points 10 hours ago

After a prolonged investigation taking many months and costing the taxpayer millions, the search committee regretfully concludes that they have been unable to find their balls.

[–] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 70 points 1 day ago (1 children)

that strongly worded letter will contain upwards of 12 strong questions. that way you'll know he's taking this serious

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 20 points 21 hours ago

He's super-cereal!

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 145 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (15 children)

The fucking clownshow continues.

This is you going in to your Professor's office hours to ostensibly turn in your final paper for a course, it is half your grade in the class, and you actually just sit down and explain you are 'still working on it' and 'can i get it to you maybe by the end of next academic quarter?'

I am honestly so, so relieved by this high level public idiocy.

I really am not kidding.

I've struggled with impostor syndrome much of my life.

All gone. Done. No more.

I am legitimately more competent than almost everyone in this administration at their own jobs, despite the fact that I hardly have any relevant credentials to most of their positions.

[–] Regrettable_incident@lemmy.world 12 points 10 hours ago

My work involves emptying dog shit bins in public parks, and I'm also pretty sure I could do a better job than this guy. We could swap roles - except that I couldn't bring myself to kiss trump's flaccid saggy butt. I'll stick with the dogshit bins - I've got standards.

[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 39 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Don't sell yourself short. I bet you're more competent than everyone in this administration.

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (4 children)

I am only hesitant to agree because:

1: I have terrible social anxiety (yay autism and trauma)

2: I assume, at least, some of them are competent people... at... at least something.

That being said, I also cannot think of a single one who falls into category 2.

Hrmm.

[–] refurbishedrefurbisher@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)

Not only are you personally more competant than anyone in this administration, but you're also not a Nazi (I'd imagine), which alone already makes you better than any Republican politician.

The fact that you think you might not be competant at the job is one of the things that makes you more competant (because you actually think before you act/speak).

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] AutistoMephisto@lemmy.world 14 points 15 hours ago

There are a couple evil yet competent people in the administration. Russell Vought is one, a hire direct from the Heritage Foundation. Another is Stephen Miller. Heritage seems to be full of actually competent yet completely evil men. But I guess that what happens when a majority of your funding comes from oil, gas, and now tech barons.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)
[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 156 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I’m so tired of the theatrical outrage and shock and surprise. Of fucking course they’re working in bad faith. But no - let’s give all the fucking fascists the benefit of the doubt. You’re not allowed to be fucking surprised by this. It was all in the playbook. The playbook has been published openly on the internet since early 2020.

[–] refurbishedrefurbisher@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

I doubt a single one of our Democratic party elected officials actually sat down and read all of Project 2025.

I think some of the young progressives probably did, but I still think the count is probably in the single digits.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] barneypiccolo@lemm.ee 17 points 20 hours ago (4 children)

Its not tin-foil hat, it's Putin. Its always Putin, using Skum and HitlerPig as his muscle.

When will people truly internalize that the two biggest foreign Sociopathic Oligarchs, have partnered up with the most prolific traitor in American history? None of them have any loyalty or patriotism toward America, and only see us as a big, rich, fat, lazy target to be ruthlessly exploited and looted, and it's happening in real time before our eyes.

All they care about is money, and either Putin is paying them directly out of the Russian Treasury (HitlerPig would rape and murder his own mother for far less than a billion bucks, and Putin could order a lot more than that), or they've cut a deal to split the booty like the pirates they are.

When it's not working, it's working.

[–] MortUS@lemmy.world 3 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (2 children)

I feel like, if this were true, wtf are literally all the other countries' intelligence and agencies doing to prevent such a thing?

I'd like to think China, while mostly on Russia's side, would not want Putin having control over the U.S.

ofc most of NATO wouldn't want that either.

Is every other country incompetent, complicit, or is the U.S. just becoming its own oligarchy?

[–] WizardofFrobozz@lemmy.ca 14 points 13 hours ago (8 children)

The US was warned about Russian influence before Trump’s 2016 election by intelligence agencies in Great Britain, Germany, Canada, France, Estonia, Poland, and Australia- and those are just the ones that spoke out publicly.

They were called “fake news” and “DNC operatives.”

Don’t pretend the rest of the world was surprised by this.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 6 points 13 hours ago

china is frenemies with russia, they are definitely not on thier side. China does have russia by the balls though, since they bought up some of siberia.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml 31 points 20 hours ago (3 children)

Dismantling the FBI seems like a good idea to me anyway. It's not like their mission is a good one. Maybe in the next government the FBI can be brought back as a federal agency that is narrowly focuses on investigating/punishing local/state level law enforcement.

But of course the Dems will just approve whatever budget the republicans come up with and facism will continue unabated.

[–] Mirshe@lemmy.world 16 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

It's actually a worse idea. There will still be, nominally, federal control, centralized in him. Other than that, every local and state FBI branch will act as, effectively, a terror cell - they work their own leads, make their own arrests on their own recognizance, and generally conduct business as they see fit. This makes for an incredibly dangerous form of secret police - they have no leaders above the local level, no real command and control, and they're all tasked with only one thing: make less crime.

Imagine the Cheka, but they're organized like al-Qaeda.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Nusm@yall.theatl.social 52 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

Soooooo, zero budget for the FBI then.

[–] SpaceShort@feddit.uk 2 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Does that mean they won't be able to notice people organizing against the Trump administration? Or is ICE the new FBI (do they have the capabilities)?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 25 points 23 hours ago (3 children)

No, they get a contigency budget of 20 bucks and this pallet of expired lunchables.

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 20 hours ago

Sorry, due to 'gestures vaguely' whatever, they're expired, moldy Feastables, brought to you By Mr Beast Burger

[–] TheCriticalMember@aussie.zone 8 points 20 hours ago

Those expired lunchables will be worth a fortune when there's nothing left at walmart!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 24 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

President Donald Trump’s nomination of Patel to lead the FBI caused a raft of controversy. Patel had publicly pledged to take the agency down and turn its building into something of a “deep state” museum. His apparent lack of preparation for this fundamental hearing will give no solace to critics convinced he was not prepared for the task at hand.

[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 3 points 12 hours ago

never trust someone with a crazy eyes.

[–] 9tr6gyp3@lemmy.world 59 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Why aren't we deporting this law breaker?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ScrambledEggs@lazysoci.al 40 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Wait, didn't this guy quit by not showing up to work for a few weeks? Am I thinking about another person?

[–] eRac@lemmings.world 54 points 1 day ago

He quit his second job by not showing up.

A guy living in an oligarchs mansion in Vegas was appointed director of 2 federal law enforcement agencies.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 24 points 1 day ago

Why are they surprised?

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›