this post was submitted on 03 Apr 2025
27 points (100.0% liked)

askchapo

22931 readers
145 users here now

Ask Hexbear is the place to ask and answer ~~thought-provoking~~ questions.

Rules:

  1. Posts must ask a question.

  2. If the question asked is serious, answer seriously.

  3. Questions where you want to learn more about socialism are allowed, but questions in bad faith are not.

  4. Try !feedback@hexbear.net if you're having questions about regarding moderation, site policy, the site itself, development, volunteering or the mod team.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
top 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Infamousblt@hexbear.net 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Spend enough time in polyamorous spaces and you see love shapes you cant even imagine

[–] Erika3sis@hexbear.net 8 points 1 day ago

You cannot grasp the true form of Polycule's love!

[–] ThermonuclearEgg@hexbear.net 10 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The generalization of a love triangle for n people is a n - 1 dimensional love simplex.

  • One person: Love point
  • Two people: Love line segment
  • Three people: Love triangle
  • Four people: Love tetrahedron
  • Five people: Love 5-cell (also called hypertetrahedron, pentachoron, etc.)

Of course, more complicated shapes probably exist too

[–] Rom@hexbear.net 6 points 1 day ago

Love Klein bottle

[–] mathemachristian@hexbear.net 2 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

my problem with this is that these relationships cannot be adequately modeled as complete, nor even undirected graphs. A love K_3 has no conflict that is to be resolved, thats just a throuple, how is one to make a drama out of it? Same for a love K_4 or indeed any love K_n where n∈ℕ. We need more interesting graphs for romantic storytelling, more precisely, digraphs with lots of single directional edges that can over the course of the story be worked into a collection of disjoint complete digraphs where the K_1 is only permissible if it has a loop. Preferably the selfcentered inlaws.

[–] ThermonuclearEgg@hexbear.net 2 points 16 hours ago

That's a good point. Perhaps an ordinary love triangle must also be presented as a directed graph, and thus all generalizations should be a directed graph which would be equivalent to the above shapes if the graph were undirected and complete.

[–] mathemachristian@hexbear.net 14 points 1 day ago

love pyramid scheme where every love interest contributes two people interested in them but which they are disinterested in.

[–] himeneko@hexbear.net 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] someone@hexbear.net 4 points 1 day ago

Sounds like my kind of Saturday night.

[–] Abracadaniel@hexbear.net 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

love Feynman diagram

>~<

[–] keepcarrot@hexbear.net 12 points 1 day ago

It's more a love V really

[–] MaoTheLawn@hexbear.net 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

and what if you add Samoa Joe into the mix

[–] Le_Wokisme@hexbear.net 4 points 1 day ago
[–] Le_Wokisme@hexbear.net 8 points 1 day ago

love pyramid

[–] rhubarb@hexbear.net 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

4 Dimensional Pentachoron of Love, Hate, and Indifference

[–] joaomarrom@hexbear.net 7 points 1 day ago

love hendecagon where each side is one type of liberalism according to Mao

[–] RedWizard@hexbear.net 6 points 1 day ago

Love dodecahedron

[–] SkingradGuard@hexbear.net 7 points 1 day ago

Love hexadecagon

[–] ksynwa@lemmygrad.ml 6 points 1 day ago

Love tetrahedron

[–] Empricorn 3 points 1 day ago
[–] Erika3sis@hexbear.net 3 points 1 day ago

CCS hitting us with the Sakura and Xiaolang both crushing on Yukito while Tomoyo crushes on Sakura before Xiaolang switches over to crushing on Sakura, which I guess isn't strictly a love square so much as a... uh... hmmm... (geometry isn't my strong suit)

Love rhombus