this post was submitted on 31 Mar 2025
708 points (98.8% liked)

News

28307 readers
3718 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de 192 points 3 days ago (3 children)

France did the thing that Democrats are too scared to. I hope it works

[–] santa@sh.itjust.works 60 points 3 days ago

Nothing to do with Democrats. This has everything to do with American Politics; Republican, Democratic, Independent.

Corruptions only friend is freedom from responsibility and accountability. We have that pretty dialed in here in usa.

[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 27 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

He was charged. Judge Cannon postponed the hearing past the election. How is that on Democrats?

[–] Tinidril@midwest.social 34 points 2 days ago (2 children)

It's not the job of politicians (or at least it shouldn't be) to prosecute criminals. However, if you count Merrick Garland as a "Democrat", he should have moved on Trump immediately after he left power. Instead, he sat on it. That was the first delay, and Judge Canon was the last. Blaming the last delay is obvious, but not the real story.

[–] Mnemnosyne@sh.itjust.works 16 points 2 days ago

Hey, don't stop at Garland. Who was Garland's boss, who could have told Garland to do his fucking job or be replaced by someone who will?

Never forget that failure to deal with Trump is ultimately on Joe Biden and no one else.

[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago (2 children)

That’s fair. I’m not sure of Garland’s motive to delay, other than a lack of constitution. Cannon was quite overtly playing games with the hearing and calendar, so she took the heat.

[–] mjhelto@lemm.ee 10 points 2 days ago

Garland didn't want to seem like his actions were political retribution, like they claimed it was anyway. He didn't want the perception they already concluded anyway!

[–] futatorius@lemm.ee 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Some heat. She's still in office.

[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

Good luck getting 2/3 of the Senate to vote for her impeachment.

[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 11 points 2 days ago (1 children)

there isnt a left in USA THOUGH, democrats are center right at most. they all kinda support some kind authoritarian leader.

You're saying that like the massive variety among them is a monolith

[–] jballs@sh.itjust.works 149 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Le Pen is reportedly accused of wrongfully diverting $5 million in funds earmarked for the European Parliament to staffers of her nationalist, xenophobic party, the National Rally, over a 12-year period.

I hate soft worded journalism. She isn't reportedly accused of shit. She was found guilty.

[–] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 50 points 2 days ago

Not soft worded. It's downright wrong.

[–] futatorius@lemm.ee 5 points 2 days ago

Didn't Farage also loot a bunch of EU funds?

[–] _core@sh.itjust.works 36 points 2 days ago

Of course they're triggered. What if we did that in America? MAGA wouldnt get to be in power.

[–] MyOpinion@lemm.ee 98 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Stop allowing criminals like Trump to run for office!

[–] StupidBrotherInLaw@lemmy.world 74 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Start putting criminals like Trump in prison!

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

Like Trump is the operative wording. Problem is that if a criminal conviction prohibits one from running for political office, the fascist parties worldwide will absolutely use that requirement to automatically disqualify all their opponents by charging them with absolute bullshit crimes, that in many functional democracies are still crimes and most people don't know those laws even exist. No one knows how to legally define "like Trump," similarly to the fact that there is no clade of "fish."

[–] futatorius@lemm.ee 7 points 2 days ago

Just start enforcing the constitutional ban on insurrectionists holding office that the corrupt Supreme Court nullified.

[–] Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee 4 points 2 days ago (3 children)

You are acting like they aren't already putting or trying tonout all their opponents in prison. Or worse.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] CurlyWurlies4All@slrpnk.net 38 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Given the number of kids Elon has had. His death would be one of the greatest acts of wealth redistribution humanity has ever seen.

[–] Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Except I seriously doubt any of his kids are going to get anything.

[–] BeardedGingerWonder@feddit.uk 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Where do you think it'll go? genuine question.

[–] Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee 6 points 2 days ago

Probably some other CEO or whoever he designates as a successor (his relatives won't have a say. I don't think his bratty toddler son will get that much, either). The way how these corporations are run are like the Roman empire. Run by backstabbing jackasses and who is the backstabbiest of them all will probably get it.

[–] regrub@lemmy.world 81 points 3 days ago

Huh, I wonder why they're so concerned about anti-corruption laws and their enforcement

[–] VeryInterestingTable@lemm.ee 52 points 2 days ago

Russian asset get's mad when another Russian asset get's pinned.

[–] AntelopeRoom@lemm.ee 25 points 2 days ago (2 children)

France ought to do more than ban her from office.

[–] RichardDegenne@lemm.ee 13 points 2 days ago

She was also sentenced to 4 years in prison (2 suspended) and a 100k€ fine.

But she will (already has?) appeal this ruling. The ineligibity, however, was ruled to be immediate, even while the trail is awaiting appeal.

[–] Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Didn't they invent a machine that gives the closest shaves and haircuts you've ever seen? So close you will never need another again?

[–] tino@lemmy.world 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

yeah, but we don't kill people anymore, that's a fascist thing. Only the far right wants the guillotine back.

[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

That's a bold claim.

[–] futatorius@lemm.ee 12 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Maybe the megalomaniac asswipe will write an executive order directing the French to pardon her.

[–] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 42 points 2 days ago (3 children)

France has to crack down on fascism ... you know why? .... the people would literally burn the entire country down than allow fascism to raise its ugly head again in their country. They are the type of people that will rip up the asphalt and cobble stone, build walls and throw them at police to protest government.

The US think that they would do the same if it happened in their country but they'd rather wait until a full blown civil war is happening and government has directed drone strikes against their house ... but by then, there won't be much of a country left to save, or even have the remnants of a country worth saving.

[–] SinningStromgald@lemmy.world 39 points 2 days ago (3 children)
[–] ohulancutash@feddit.uk 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Local government still has a legal obligation to ensure that every town and village has a functioning bakery, so no-one has a revolutionary urge.

[–] Tinidril@midwest.social 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Are they required to bake cake?

[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

And death, yes.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Solumbran@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago

People really have no clue what's going on in France, huh.

[–] SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Le Pen’s party got 30% of the votes last year. They won the popular vote. Just not enough constituencies to win the most seats. Fascism has raised its head already.

[–] futatorius@lemm.ee 1 points 7 hours ago

They won the popular vote.

70% of votes being against them is no mandate. And it doesn't matter. Fascist parties should be banned in any democracy, since they exist to destroy democracy.

[–] DaddleDew@lemmy.world 33 points 2 days ago

This is rather tame considering how France has historically handled its corrupt leaders and authoritarians.

[–] don@lemm.ee 28 points 3 days ago

Meanwhile, congress dems: damn, I just reached my one billionth twiddle! 🥳 🎂