Do you think they all got instructions by the government what to censor or is it just masks off now?
this post was submitted on 25 Mar 2025
296 points (97.4% liked)
Privacy
1763 readers
463 users here now
Welcome! This is a community for all those who are interested in protecting their privacy.
Rules
PS: Don't be a smartass and try to game the system, we'll know if you're breaking the rules when we see it!
- Be civil and no prejudice
- Don't promote big-tech software
- No reposting of news that was already posted
- No crypto, blockchain, NFTs
- No Xitter links (if absolutely necessary, use xcancel)
Related communities:
Some of these are only vaguely related, but great communities.
- !opensource@programming.dev
- !selfhosting@slrpnk.net / !selfhosted@lemmy.world
- !piracy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
- !drm@lemmy.dbzer0.com
founded 4 months ago
MODERATORS
It's very easy to take over a subreddit or Lemmy community. Become friendly with the mods, then become a mod, then subtly harass and drive out (from separate accounts) any moderators who are standing in your way, then do whatever you want.
There is a whole industry of "reputation management" that specializes in distorting the narrative on the internet in favor of your company / your government / whatever. The question is not "are there gangs of Reddit moderators who are bad actors trying to distort the conversation," the question is how many and who they are acting on behalf of.
Of course, Lemmy copied Reddit's fairly silly and failure-prone model. Why they did that, I don't know. On Twitter / Mastodon-style networks, you can do the same but you at least have to be a little bit sophisticated about it. On Reddit/Lemmy, it is trivial to do if you are patient about it and put some consistent effort into it, and you can make a ton of money if you can do it well.
Hmm. FOSStodon team:
The moderators are the unsung heroes of Fosstodon. They’re the people who work every single report we receive, and take appropriate action to keep Fosstodon a friendly and inclusive place for all our members.
CarrotCypher
Role: Moderator
MODERATOR OF
r/privacy
r/Pareidolia
r/opensource
r/OSINT
r/tails
… and 51 more ⇒
Yep
Become friendly with the mods, then become a mod, then subtly harass and drive out (from separate accounts) any moderators who are standing in your way, then do whatever you want.
!yepowertrippinbastards@lemmy.dbzer0.com is still a thing
!196@lemmy.world attempted takeover lead to !onehundredninetysix@lemmy.blahaj.zone
So I'm not sure it's that easy
Yeah, but I think the 196 blowup was just home-grown hamhandedness. I don't think that was anything malicious.
The moderation activities I've seen on Lemmy that I would interpret as malicious are a lot more subtle and do not show up on YPTB that I can remember. One example is anonymous /c/politics mods making malicious decisions (making it illegal to claim someone is doing propaganda, or running cover for UniversalMonk), and then shoving Jordan to the front to take all the heat for it. Another would be having a little tidal wave of accounts accusing one of the moderators (who is taking action against propaganda) of all kinds of sins, until eventually that person stops spending time on Lemmy again and the propaganda can stay.
I feel like the techniques for doing this kind of thing are pretty advanced at this point, and no one really has time to pay enough attention to counteract them. On reddit they can be more overt, because there's not enough of a coherent community to notice or do anything about it, whereas Lemmy at least does have YPTB to keep it a little bit in check. So maybe on that score you are right, but I definitely don't feel like YPTB means it's not happening.
There was someone who did it professionally who showed up on Reddit at one point talking about their experience and techniques and it was pretty interesting and pretty depressing.
making it illegal to claim someone is doing propaganda, or running cover for UniversalMonk
That didn't really go under the radar
Another would be having a little tidal wave of accounts accusing one of the moderators (who is taking action against propaganda) of all kinds of sins, until eventually that person stops spending time on Lemmy again and the propaganda can stay.
I know about this one, but let's be honest, that mod was quite aggressive as well
Can you guys give details? I'm kind of curious about who you are talking about and what's the propaganda. It's better to be on the lookout for it in any case.
So, leading up to the election, there was a very obvious tide of "let's all vote for Jill Stein" propaganda on the political communities. Basically, linking Kamala Harris as hard as possible to the genocide in Gaza and the US's current bad immigration policy, in cartoonishly lazy ways, and in ways that violated the site rules (for example posting dozens of stories a day with the same messaging, from the same account, apparently with the mods' blessing).
It's been fairly quiet since then as far as US politics. There are still some isolated communities that are clearly written with the exclusive goal of shitting on Democrats or boosting up Russia, but it's not really a front-and-center feature of browsing Lemmy like it was pre-election.
So the mod who was harassed out was FlyingSquid. From time to time, people would have these extremely performative freakouts about how Squid was power tripping, banning anyone who disagreed with them and arguing with everyone, which had a grain of truth (the arguing part, sometimes, but not the banning part) but it all got blown up into some kind of emergency so consistently and so emotionally that it felt to me like some weird kind of deliberate campaign.
If you want to see another more recent example, check this out:
https://lemmy.world/post/27393569
Jordan is the mod being harassed and being accused of racism and censorship, in my view, there, with the persistently repeated myth being that he is a Zionist and will delete from worldnews any anti-Israel story.
Let’s be real here, you would have removed it even if it was in a “actual news agency”.
Ah, the good ole “I’m not racist, I had a roommate who wasn’t white” argument.
Terminal liberal brain. PTB.
Thank you for censoring a journalist who died to get the word out, using made up rules. You must be very proud of yourself.
Another Jordan Lund post, another chance to remind everyone that @jordanlund@lemmy.world is a racist and a zionist and will do whatever he can to delete pro-Palestinian posts, or posts that criticize Israel.
Jordan Lund is a vile, racist, zionist piece of shit, and anyone who defends or supports him is sitting at the table with him and accepts those labels for themselves.
And so on. Literally all he did is remove a link to Substack, and tell the person who posted it that they should post instead the same story from some more reliable source (of which he provided multiples they could use). A number of accounts then commenced a loud hours-long freakout about what a piece of shit he is. Literally the number two story at the time of posting was reporting on some of Israel's crimes, which happens every day in worldnews.
It's possible that that's just Lemmy reading comprehension and virtue-signaling at work, and they're ignoring the facts and trying to create alternative facts just because that's a fun thing to do on the internet. My personal belief is that it is more malicious than that.
load more comments
(1 replies)
load more comments
(1 replies)
load more comments
(1 replies)
Lemmy has open modlogs. Also, on Lemmy the instance owner can still ultimately override anything a mod does as they control the database.
That's why it's important to pick the instance for a community carefully.
And if, for example, this privacy community get overtake, other privacy communities can co exist in other instances.
Thank you that is more likely.
It’s more likely that Zuck or Musk paid someone to go play moderator. Anyone can become a moderator.
Another deleted comment
Note, it seems you are not allowed in this reddit to express an opinion containing doubt about the security of WhatsApp - it will be removed by mods. As such, you can not read the replies here and form a judgement about what the consensus is.
carrotcypher (mod) 1 point 3 days, 1 hour ago
Or, you know, obvious astroturfing as an excuse to promote alternatives is against the rules.
Astroturfing is when you say something I'm paid not to like
Or, you know, obvious astroturfing as an excuse to promote alternatives is against the rules.
The irony of that statement is that it ultimately seems like they are the ones astroturfing here.
Any time you hear about anyone high profile using a chat app - what are they using?
They're using Signal.
There's a reason why they're using Signal; as far as security it's the best one out there. Sure, it's tied to a phone number, but a phone number isn't an identity.
Phone numbers are heavily tied to a person.
What signal had going for it is encryption, but that major flaw of tied to phone number makes me doubt everything else they say.
The phone number link means forward security isn't possible. If ever the encryption is hacked, all your messages could be forfeit by anyone who's simply kept the encrypted data.
The phone number link means forward security isn't possible. If ever the encryption is hacked, all your messages could be forfeit by anyone who's simply kept the encrypted data.
Can you elaborate on that? Obviously the phone number has privacy implications, but I don't think it can be used to decrypt messages. In the signal protocol, encryption keys are exchanged using ECDH (so wiretapping doesn't work) and periodically rotated (so even knowing the encryption keys at a certain point doesn't let you decrypt messages after that).
The comment that you replied to does not imply the phone number can be used to decrypt messages. All they are saying is that because Signal accounts are tied to phone numbers, a potential adversary already has one piece of the puzzle (who is talking to whom). If somehow, some way, the encryption were ever compromised, then the adversary would have both pieces—in other words, they would know not only who is talking to whom but also what they are saying.
load more comments
(1 replies)
A phone number can be traced back to a person. If there is ever a hack or backdoor it can be traced. There are plenty of alternatives that are open source and don't require any kind of identifier.
I think he is going for the idea once encryption is broke in the future... You name is tied to the content forever.
Without phone number it would be just some random content.
load more comments
(1 replies)
Phone number is KYC'd
It is literally an identity and thats why everyone forcing you to use it now.
Phonenumbers are easy to fake, I have two signal accounts without any ties to my person.
load more comments
(4 replies)
I agree with what other people are saying, the whole phone number requirement of Signal isn't great since, for the most part phone numbers are intended to link to your real world identity. That means they are a very big weak link.
Also let us not forget that Signal is a centralized service run by one company. They have been very resistant in the past to the idea of decentralization and interoperability. I'm already very skeptical of people who claim to be a savior or hero of Privacy and security lie this, even more so when it's a centralized service. You do know that WhatsApp started out like Signal did right? Look where they are now. You cannot trust a centralized service like Signal, especially one that forces you to provide real world identification. Signal can just as easily be sold and backdoored like WhatsApp was, decentralized services are much more resilient to that kind of thing.
Whatsapp was bought by Facebook and then one of the folks dumped their money into signal making it a self-funded org.
WhatsApp uses client-side scanning, which breaks end-to-end encryption by recording data before it gets encrypted or after it gets decrypted.
WhatsApp has long been known to not be private
The oligarchy knows the whole tech sector is going to implode, and they’re trying to stave it off by curtailing criticism. Cute, and useless.
Go lemmings!
The Customs and Border Protection agents have authority to request a foreign entrant (even with visa) to unlock their phones. They can also deny entry if the entrant doesn’t cooperate.
So they don’t need to have backdoor access to WhatsApp. They can get in through the front.
My understanding is that this is what happened. They searched his phone, found the messages, then detained him.
Use screenshots instead of links.
I did upload a screenshot with the link, but I guess it's inaccessible... Here it is in full resolution
you left out reddit's reason for removing the question
Addressed already - tl;dr nonsensical (and as a bonus, the reason does not exist in their rule list)
The mods response is odd but also the comments are real. Who is dumb enough to think WhatsApp is safe?
Your post has been removed for being too specific to a company or single product. These days, reddit is heavily astroturfed with fake posts asking questions about companies and services by shills of those same companies and services as a form of fake organic advertising, and by competitors trying to create FUD to benefit their own product or service. This often takes the form or character assassination, libel, and conspiracy theories.
We don’t allow it, and in order to keep it from happening, we remove posts that are too close to astroturfing, corporate comparisons, personal Nd political opinions, ranting diatribes, etc.
If your question was legitimate (asking for pros and cons, potential issues, comparisons, etc), feel free to use subreddits more appropriate such as one for the company or service mentioned, or see privacyguides.org for community comparisons and recommendations to privacy focused open source software.
r/privacy moderators also censored this post with the same reason:
IRS nears deal with ICE to share addresses of SUSpected undocumented immigrants
Really makes you think.
Okay that’s absolutely insane. Glad I switched to here even though it’s quieter
Glad to have you here, too. Its not as big as the reddit counterpart but I like this community.
Kind of you to say. Must be glad to have you here because voyager tags you as being upvoted by me a lot! :D
Fewer people but 1000x the engagement. I switched last month and I already have more upvotes than my 15yo Reddit account. Also folks are way, way smarter here. I feel like I'm learning more than I contribute, opposite story on Reddit. Well welcome!
load more comments
(4 replies)
Well that's a way to look at it.
This def feels like censorship.
We saw Lemmy.world mods uses these clown tactics when CEo got deposed.
They just make up reasons for it it seems as they go.
Redditors in tech subs... Got down voted to oblivion for trying to point out just because Whatsapp uses E2EE, that it doesn't mean meta can't extract the messages from the apps before and after transmission.
Man I just can't get over all this free speech there is on Reddit. Just like how Twitter is legit America's Town Hall, if you're the "right kind" if American.
view more: next ›