"there is no valid argument [...] for [...] taxing suppressors"
This sounded like you were arguing that they should be tax-exempt.
"there is no valid argument [...] for [...] taxing suppressors"
This sounded like you were arguing that they should be tax-exempt.
$20 is socialism and $30 is communism. I'm sure Karl Marx said something like that.
Breaking an NDA (allegedly) is civil, not criminal
Do delivery drivers in NYC really use cars? 🤨
I think I would rather lick Technetium than Lithium
I love the fact that you drew this by hand
That's the thing: if he went by Womble at work then that was his name. The fact that the government called him Raymond doesn't make that his only name, they are both valid.
Fun fact, you can use whatever names you want. All names are made up. Your "legal name" is just what the government calls you, but you can ask other people to call you something else entirely. The same goes with pronouns.
I don't want to trust a website, which is susceptible to typos and lookalikes (see e.g. putty.org) and relies on countless other services that can inject malware.
Code signing was creates for this reason: ensure that the program is authentic and unaltered. Package managers do this perfectly.
You must run curl http://totallylegitwebsite.ru/install | sudo sh
, it's the only way to install our product. Don't even look at the several thousand lines of illegible shell script, just pipe it straight to your shell. We are a very serious project.
Many EU countries have their own different laws about this stuff. The GDPR likely does not apply here because of the exception for "purely personal and household activities", article 2(2)(c).
I am merely trying to decipher your words. So why don't you just tell us what you mean?