this post was submitted on 13 Mar 2025
596 points (94.6% liked)

politics

21775 readers
3831 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Former vice presidential nominee Tim Walz criticized Trump for economic chaos while taking personal responsibility for the situation during an MSNBC interview.

"We wouldn't be in this mess if we'd have won the election — and we didn't," Walz told Chris Hayes. He called Trump the "worst possible business executive" and praised the Wall Street Journal's editorial criticizing Trump's tariff war.

Walz emphasized Democrats must offer something better, not just criticize Trump. Recently, he acknowledged a leadership void in the Democratic Party and admitted spending too much time combatting Trump's false claims about immigrants.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 18 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

i want walz and aoc in 2028

we don't blame you tim we love you ❤️

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] RabbitBBQ@lemmy.world 39 points 23 hours ago (5 children)

It's so obvious the democratic party lied about Biden to get through the nomination phase and used the fact that the money already donated for the campaign was specifically to Biden or Harris and would not have easily been given over to any other new candidate. You do have to wonder, especially after how Trump was greeted by them, just what actually happened here. The fact is that the truth about Bidens condition should have been known, he should have decided not to run, and the Democratic party should've had a real primary for real candidates and new ideas. Tim Walz was as bad of a VP pick as Tim Kaine. The white guy as VP to shore up the right wing vote is a total myth. Biden was kind of the first one, then Tim Kaine, then Tim Walz. It just doesn't work. Neither will Newsoms podcast attempt at finding common ground which he hopes will translate into moderate votes. Democrats really have no clue just how bad things are about to get...

[–] ClassStruggle@lemmy.ml 11 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

the truth about Bidens condition should have been known

It was known, and lots of us were shouting from the rooftops about it, But Democrats and liberals did everything they could to shut us up, accuse us of being Russian bots, accuse us of helping to get Trump elected, when it was liberals that got Trump elected by ignoring the people that saw every single sign

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] uuldika@lemmy.ml 18 points 23 hours ago (3 children)

I wouldn't be surprised if Newsom pulls a Tulsi Gabbard and switches sides. He had Charlie Kirk (of TPUSA) on his podcast where he "completely aligned" with him on trans rights (i.e. eradicating us), then had Steve Bannon on. That's a bit much even for the Liz Cheney flank of the DNC.

I suspect Newsom doesn't see any future for his party, and is bailing out instead.

[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 6 points 18 hours ago

That's EXACTLY what I'm expecting, when he stood up to Trump I thought he'd be alright, but the dude has basically been courting the Far Right and going all in on being as transphobic as possible.

He'll run the sadly profitable "I was on the Left peacefully drinking Kombucha and eating Avocado Toast like the next pink pussyhat wearing hippie, but then they went too far when they tried to tell me the Holocaust actually happened! They've gone completely nuts!" grift.

[–] RabbitBBQ@lemmy.world 12 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (1 children)

In my experience, the higher up you go in both parties, you tend to sort of arrive at the same places with the same people... and most importantly, the same donors and the same money machine. That's the great thing about the U.S. dollar really, corruption and selling Govt from Citizens United to today sort of drives the bipartisan nature of it because it all greases the wheels of the two party political machine.

I've listened to several episodes of his podcast... I'll probably continue listening but in the first episode Newsom basically kept saying he only got into college because his scores were low and he played baseball. Then he kept backing down to Charlie Kirk, Bannon, etc, while constantly saying he doesn't know what to do and kept asking them for ideas. In the first episode, there was a moment where he said Jesus Fucking Christ or something to Charlie Kirk, which called him out on it. It's like, the very voters he's trying to go after will hear that and stop at the first episode. He will gain no allies on the right as he abandons the party he is supposed to believe in, along with the core values he is supposed to defend. He thinks having a podcast with right wing guests where he gets sort of transactional on the issues. Like, do you think giving up the trans in sports debate is going to win you anything when their entire side would like to see gay marriage go away entirely? While you claim to still even support that? Do these people even think any of this through?

If Newsoms approach is the best the Democrats have to offer, then it might be game over for a very long time...

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] shaquilleoatmeal@lemm.ee 2 points 16 hours ago

I’ve been wondering if there’s a gas leak at Newsom’s house. The hell happened to him?

[–] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (3 children)

And every time you point this shit out, people will stick their fingers in their ears and say:

You had a primary and we all picked Biden!

Ignore that the 2016, 2020, and 2024 primaries were effectively just for show! Ignore that they argued in court they have no reason to follow democratic policies in their primaries!

Ignore the evidence that the media hated outsiders that threatened their bank accounts and loved the ones that increased them!

Turn off your brain and cut out your tongue, vote blue no matter who we pick for you!

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 10 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (3 children)

So it seems like it's going to come down between Gavin The Transphobe and Tim Walz for 2028, and honestly Tim Walz is who I learn more towards, dude feels like a second coming of Bernie.

Meanwhile Gavin started out in 2025 being the strong man who stared Trump down, but he not only folded, he sold out transpeople.

Anyone who carries water for the "Transpeople are crazy and giving them basic human rights is going too far" is a danger to us all

[–] dependencyinjection@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 16 hours ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Mangoholic@lemmy.ml 3 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

That's only if Trump gives up his power after his 4 years... very unlikely. He will just start a war and impose martial law or just let the supreme court add a law that removes the limit, like they already proposed and if that doesn't work, voter fraud with all the government officials getting fired is easy peasy. I think it's over there is no comeback other than a bloody and voilent civil war or fascism until imperial collapse.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] melpomenesclevage@lemmy.dbzer0.com 32 points 1 day ago (1 children)

honestly, if walz had been managed competently, I think he'd have been a pretty good folksy VP candidate. especially if he'd kept up on the 'weeeeird' stuff.

harris was just a terrible idea, and she didn't even push her strengths. it's like she, and the people who put her there, were all trying to lose.

[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 5 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

The "Weeeeird" stuff would have knocked Trump right out of the park.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] WhatThaFudge@lemmy.sdf.org 59 points 1 day ago (3 children)

“We wouldn’t be in this mess if we’d have won the election — and we didn’t,”
(Implies that if they(H&W) would have won we wouldn't be in this mess)

has quite the different sentiment than

"Tim Walz says ‘we wouldn’t be in this mess’ if it wasn’t for him and Harris" (Implies its their fault we are in this mess)

These headlines -_-

Not that I prefer straight bias but we got conservative media calling these people cutting all of everyone's safety nets "heroes" and this is supposed to be liberal media straight misquoting for clicks?

We are in the worst timeline.

[–] pumpkinseedoil@mander.xyz 4 points 17 hours ago

Walz emphasized Democrats must offer something better, not just criticize Trump.

[–] knightly@pawb.social 19 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I do blame them, though. They could have ridden the coattails of Biden's withdrawal all the way to victory, but instead Hartis capitulated and palled around on stages with Republicans instead of Walz.

The failure of the Democrat campaign has a lot of causes, but none more so than the failure of leadership.

[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 5 points 19 hours ago

Ultimately nobody wants to touch the issue of spiraling national and global wealth inequality, but it's destroying our economic systems and the only fix would seem to be redistributing that wealth.

Democrats need to force their doners to make concessions to the American people in order to get voters, which goes against the interests of their doners, and they won't get elected without the money to spend on advertising that wins elections.

Both the Republicans and the Neolibs lead to an oligarchhy.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] jpreston2005@lemmy.world 54 points 1 day ago (1 children)

There's no leadership void in the Democratic Party, it's been Bernard Sanders for quite a while. Them denying this is to their (and everyone elses) detriment. Just run Bernie/AOC and let's get this over with.

[–] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 23 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

Nancy Pelosi is the leadership of the Democrats. And AOC was not allowed to become top house dem. They chose Gerry ~~Atrick~~ Connely instead.

AOC and Bernie will never be allowed to do anything besides sheepdogging progressives into the Democratic party. And at this point it appears they are fully on board with that.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] MisterOwl@lemmy.world 145 points 1 day ago (25 children)

Nope. This is on Biden. It's his fault Harris/Walz were put into an impossible situation.

That senile old fuck was supposed to be a one-term president. If they'd spent 4 years planning for 2024 instead of sitting around with their thumbs up their asses maybe they could have run a winning campaign.

But no, Joe was too proud or stupid or both to stick to that plan. This election was lost the instant he doddered his way on to the debate stage on 6/27/24.

[–] TheGiantKorean@lemmy.world 52 points 1 day ago (10 children)

Lots and lots of balls were dropped. Garland didn't get Trump in jail when he could have. Biden didn't stick to only one term. A democratic candidate wasn't really elected when Biden stepped down (for the record, I think that Harris was more than qualified, but a lot of people were upset that she was just "chosen"). Harris didn't try to stand out and be her own candidate - she mostly just stuck with the status quo and never disagreed with Biden. Etc etc etc.

[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 6 points 15 hours ago

Garland never had any intention to prosecute trump

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world 82 points 1 day ago (6 children)

It's on Biden and Garland for not throwing Trump in prison the second his term ended.

[–] kandoh@reddthat.com 60 points 1 day ago (9 children)

Exactly, and it's the third time we've been betrayed like this.

Not going after the Bush administration.

Not going after the subprime mortgage architects.

Not going after Trump.

Three times, they've had the easiest of layups for public approval of all time and they've consistently fucked it up.

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (23 replies)
[–] maplebar@lemmy.world 25 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (9 children)

I don't blame Harris or Walz. I don't even blame Biden, the senile old fool that he so clearly is.

I blame the Americans for fucking up the most outrageously obvious binary choice in history.

Has there ever been an election so obvious? Even during Trump vs Clinton one could almost be forgiven for giving Trump the benefit of the doubt as a "political outsider", but by 2024 we knew exactly who this fucking guy was... The fact that people today are acting surprised and outraged about all the stuff that's been happening during Trump's first 1.5 months is only further proof that Americans are perhaps the dumbest amnesiacs to infest the Earth.

Literally all we had to do was vote against Trump's particular brand of fascism.

But Americans are the type of people who fail a single question true or false quiz because they forgot to write their name at the top of the page, and we deserve to suffer the consequences of our collective stupidity over and over until it is bred out of us, or until our society falls. The American people allowed this to happen--and not just Trump, but everything bad that has happened over the course of American history.

[–] Mandelbrot@lemmy.world 10 points 23 hours ago

Nah it's actually their fault. The fact that they lost when it was "the most outrageously obvious binary choice in history" shows how hard they fucked a lay-up.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 180 points 1 day ago (37 children)

“I think Americans have had it,” Walz explained. ”... Look, I own this. We wouldn’t be in this mess if we’d have won the election ― and we didn’t.”

Good to see someone from the campaign acknowledge "getting votes" was the campaign's entire job, and losing the election is the fault of the campaign.

I hope Walz runs in a competitive primary and gets the nomination.

But if they try to just hand a baton off, we're gonna see the same result.

load more comments (37 replies)
[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 45 points 1 day ago (2 children)

DNCs fault for blocking Bernie

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 35 points 1 day ago (24 children)

The voters deserve a lot of blame here.

You can lead a horse to water....

Any ADULT can easily see that politicians are going to be imperfect, and no single candidate is going to align 100% with your stance. Demanding that they do, or else you'll vote for literally the worst possible option, or sit out, or vote a "protest" vote, all so that someone, somewhere will "learn" something is just fucking childish and stupid. And this will be continue to be true no matter how many times the Tone Police show up to admonish people about blaming voters. Sorry, not sorry: I blame the voters.

[–] ClassStruggle@lemmy.ml 5 points 20 hours ago (3 children)

Harris could have aligned with 99% of what I wanted, but that 1% was OK with genocide, and that should have been a red line for anyone.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (23 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›