this post was submitted on 05 Mar 2025
596 points (98.5% liked)

Canada

8435 readers
1989 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


πŸ—ΊοΈ Provinces / Territories


πŸ™οΈ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


πŸ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


πŸ’» Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


πŸ’΅ Finance, Shopping, Sales


πŸ—£οΈ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] redlemace@lemmy.world 33 points 2 days ago (11 children)

As should europe. Clearly you can't trust the USA anymore. What is the long-term prospect for spare parts?

[–] Iceman@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago (3 children)

From what I've heard you need a password that changes on the daily to start a F-35 and that the US are the only ones that can provide it. If that is true, it's a tremendous oversite for any sovereign state.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
[–] Zer0_F0x@lemmy.world 139 points 3 days ago (2 children)

The US can remotely disable them whenever they damn well please anyway, and can not be trusted not to.

Everyone should be canceling their orders immediately, and disable the remote access capabilities to the ones they have.

[–] wise_pancake@lemmy.ca 80 points 3 days ago

Nobody should have ever purchased military equipment with that feature.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 33 points 3 days ago (4 children)

Has it actually been confirmed they can do this? I would assume they backdoor them, but usually backdoors are secret.

[–] Shadow@lemmy.ca 39 points 3 days ago (4 children)

They require software updates for every mission, that are distributed from the US.

You can probably fly / use it without those, but you lose all the advanced command & control features

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] ohulancutash@feddit.uk 23 points 3 days ago (5 children)

They don’t function without phoning home to a US-controlled server every 24 hours.

[–] ramble81@lemm.ee 17 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Give is to Empress, she’ll knock out a crack in no time.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)

The aircraft has significant security risks for sure and makes sense to cancel. But canceling the order won't be on Trump's radar unless it affects his inner circle of evil billionaires who have funneled dark money to him.

Existing provokes Trump.

[–] hddsx@lemmy.ca 60 points 3 days ago

American here. Who cares if it provokes Trump? Actions have consequences. Canada helped out a lot during 911. What did we do? Prove to be an unreliable partner

[–] RaskolnikovsAxe@lemmy.ca 37 points 3 days ago (15 children)

Goddamn right we should. Take the French up on the offer to build the Rafale here. Or the Swedes. And get a few demo units for short term.

Fuck 'em on any cancellation fees too. Consider it partial compensation for the ridiculous trade war.

[–] xzot746@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 days ago

There was an article last week discussing how that plane calls home every day and that it can be blocked by the Americans. They can shut all of them down within 24 hours.

Time to nope right out of that contract.

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] Onemadmother@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 days ago

They cannot be trusted, that much we know. We need to become independent and not reliant

[–] Remember_the_tooth@lemmy.world 59 points 3 days ago (1 children)

With tariffs hammering F-35 sales, I expect the next Eurofighter project will have a lot more resources. I wonder if Canada will get involved.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 46 points 3 days ago (5 children)

Sweden also offered to get us building our own Gripens totally locally. The page for the bid is even still up

I assume we already have pilots trained in flying the F-35 at this point, which sucks if we're never getting them, though.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 53 points 3 days ago

Any NATO member increasing their military spending would be idiotic to spend their money with US-based companies.

[–] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 26 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Canada should cancel the F-35 contract and their are better fighter jets from reliable NATO allies. The F-35 is a $2 trillion USD turd that is still not 100%. If Canada continues to purchase US weapons, this would be like Poland buying weapons from Nazi Germany. I am hoping the US MIC becomes pissed off.

[–] Maiq@lemy.lol 14 points 2 days ago

2 trillion is a fuckload of drones!

[–] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 36 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

100% TODAY! Do not pay a fucking dime of any amount owing for these. (good job on Globe and Mail for a change)

FYI, the Israeli version of F35 does not have this "US permission for every flight required"

F35 is a POS plane, with low uptime, in addition to "broken ownership". Even US military does not get manuals on how to repair/maintain them and must hire Lockheed consultants to do the job. The whole program was a boondoggle to pay Lockheed the most money possible instead of getting good military equipment, and any corrupt POS that was involved in approving this purchase for Canada should be jailed for treason.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 14 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (7 children)

There's nothing stopping Canada from getting the manuals and patching the software. Most of the FUD about it's performance abilities is propaganda. So getting them and just locking out Lockheed and the US would be a pretty good middle finger too.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] HugeNerd@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 days ago

We shouldn't have caved back in the Arrow days.

[–] arotrios@lemmy.world 41 points 3 days ago (4 children)

Nah, y'all should accept delivery then refuse to pay. Give him a taste of his own medicine.

[–] ReanuKeeves@lemm.ee 45 points 3 days ago (1 children)

So take the planes, send Trump the bill, when he acts confused you tell him he should really be more grateful about this

[–] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 28 points 3 days ago

"have you said thank you even once"

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] opi@lemmy.ca 29 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

I don't think Canada should be basing their defense decisions on the opinion and thin skin of the American government. Trying to force Canada, in any way, to purchase F35's is fishy - not that that's happening, of course.

Canada's interests are for Canada. Not them. Also, maybe Canada should reboot their ventures into the Avro Arrow program again. That'll ruffle some feathers. Canadian engineered military = quite formidable, I think.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 13 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Canadian engineered military = quite formidable, I think.

Here's the bad news. It's not. Sure, we're good at peacekeeping, and we deploy to support (militarily) our allies. But we're using US gear and we're woefully underfunded because war budget has been declared a waste by even the parties who strut and posture about a strong military. We only needed to fulfill our NATO obligations, for decades, and even that has been a struggle we haven't won consistently with the low budget.

And while we're skilled enough and gung-ho, and our 1st Pioneers are about the most scary bunch of lumberjack commandos you'll ever see, there's just so few of them, and again their gear has been called old and out of repair by every administration campaigning because the last one never did a thing about it.

We're gonna need a lot of funding and training and gear to make up the shortfall in people and powpow toys, and that's a slice of gov pork that Milhouse is gonna latch onto knowing that he doesn't need an army once he gives the country over. Justin doesn't want to spend that, but he - and please God let it be Mark next - is really gonna have to.

But how do we sell it to the "hair guy bad" flatlanders steeped in 12 years of hating Justin for not being a pseudo-aristocratic milquetoast conservative?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Bzdalderon@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 days ago

Bring back the avro arrow. Let's do it.

[–] Scott_of_the_Arctic@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago (2 children)

We should throw some cash at Saab and see if they can come up with a stealth gripen or something.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Franklin@lemmy.ca 23 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

ooh no, it might provoke the person who is back stabbing us at every conceivable opportunity

[–] Tramort@programming.dev 20 points 3 days ago

Hell yeah they should. We need to be able to defend ourselves against southern aggression, and the F35 is compromised based on what Trump himself threatened.

[–] yannic@lemmy.ca 12 points 2 days ago

The PM agrees with The Globe and Mail once and now they think they'll get two in a row?

load more comments
view more: next β€Ί