this post was submitted on 02 Mar 2025
32 points (90.0% liked)

Games

17681 readers
506 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

"Good enough for game pass"

Laura brings up some excellent points

  • Obsidian shipped on time, after being acquired
  • Obsidian already has outer worlds 2 in the works
  • Obsidian gets the OW team back together

Avowed may not be a win on its own, but in the context of a MS studio it's a win, and they cleared their plate to focus on OW2.

all 27 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] koncertejo@lemmy.ml 8 points 18 hours ago

I really haven't understood the reactions I've seen to the game. To me it's a really tight, interwoven, streamlined action-RPG that checks so many boxes for me that other games haven't tried to touch for years. 9/10 from me personally. It's been wild seeing the incredibly lukewarm reaction everywhere else.

[–] ObsidianZed@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

I have really being enjoying it, granted, I didn't actually buy it. Just playing through Game Pass. I was definitely watching for it and started checking it out Day 1.

Is it GotY? Nah, but there haven't been many recent games that I've enjoyedn as much.

[–] Viri4thus@feddit.org 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

All well and good with the pyrrhic victories for obsidian but, after paying 70€ for Avowed and returning it because it is a bargain bin RPG at best, the only victory Obsidian achieved was shedding yet another supporter of them pre-acquisition (kickstarters included). I will likely ignore TOW2 till it is heavily diacounted and Obsidian has been moved to the unreliable developers pile. Looking at steam stats, size of team and estimated sales numbers, I'm not alone in this.

It appears Warhorse, Larian et al have something that was lost in US studios. Avowed had a 6y development cycle under the umbrella of one of the wealthiest companies in the world, there are exactly 0 excuses for it to be this meh.

[–] steeznson@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Respectfully disagree with your opinion but many reviewers seem to have raised similar points to you so I'm wondering if I'm an outlier for enjoying it so much.

[–] Viri4thus@feddit.org 3 points 1 day ago

I think it's also an expectation game. When you pay 70€ for a game from a storied studio, after 6y of development and a massive marketing campaign one expects a certain level of quality and familiarity. Obsidian worlds are famously dynamic, from Outer worlds 1 (had different problems), POE all the way back to the genesis of the studio, including 3rd pty commissioned projects like New Vegas. I, like many other fans, expected the same dynamic world and engaging story, and we didn't get that. The combat is fun, on a superficial level, it's great, but I find Avowed lacking much like I find FFXVI lacking. The interactivity, mechanics and depth of the R in RPG is too small, it's an action game. If I want an action game, I'm not spending 70€ for an obsidian game, there are far better studios out there for that genre.

I know it's #firstworldproblems but it really left a sour taste in my mouth to have yet another obsidian game feel like a cash in of the obsidian name roster than a genuine attempt at making a good game. If one takes Laura's "victory" story and is less generous (she's a personal relationship of people on the team) Obsidian has shipped underwhelming games because MS wants to ship asap, rather than cooking to an acceptable level of quality.

[–] ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago

It's $70. There has been little appetite for $60 games as of late, but from what it sounds like Avowed at least has $70 bucks worth of time and stuff. Whereas many $60 titles aren't worth their sale prices--its not a high bar.

A $40 or less Avowed on sale next year will do well I predict.

[–] Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

I'm really enjoying it so far. I haven't had much time, so I'm not very far in.

My only complaint is that I'm playing on a launch Series X and it crashes to the home screen constantly. I set it to autosave frequently, and it doesn't take long to boot back up, so I just keep trudging through, but it really is frustrating.

[–] hellerphant@lemmy.cafe 5 points 1 day ago (5 children)

I will admit I haven’t watched the video (I’m going to when I get home) but I thought Avowed was doing pretty well?

A number of major podcasts and outlets are signing its praises. It has some divisive scores for sure, but I’ve certainly anecdotally heard way more praise than criticism from games media, and friends of mine who are playing.

Obsidian have been on a pretty decent roll for quite some time. Avowed is exactly what Gamepass was seeking to support - smaller focused games, and it ain’t even that small. 30-50 hours from what I’m hearing.

I’m not even a massive fan of the genre, or the studio, but I don’t really get the negativity surrounding the game. Seems pretty successful by most metrics to me.

[–] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It’s fun. Has its clear limitations, so it’s not as broad as many rpgs, but what it does do, it pulls off well. The “gamers” being mad about the pronoun picker is the source of a lot of the derision as far as I can tell.

[–] hellerphant@lemmy.cafe 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Have they released numbers yet? Surely it has sold pretty well, the word of mouth must be decent.

[–] ampersandrew@lemmy.world 2 points 18 hours ago

It "reached" almost 5 million players. They do not break down how many of those are purchased copies versus Game Pass subscribers. Here's a handy trick that I've heard from devs though: your range for how many people purchased the game is somewhere between 20x and 70x the number of reviews it has. Most end up around 55; for the biggest successes like Elden Ring, it ends up being closer to 20. So about 363k copies sold on Steam, probably; reviews tend to come after someone's done playing a game, after all.

[–] Death_Equity@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Gamepass numbers are unknown, but steam had a peak of like 19k players. Estimates on ownership is around 200k units.

Monster Hunter Wilds had 1.3m peak, unknown sales estimate because it is too new. Kingdom Come Deliverance 2, 256k peak, over 2m sales estimate.

Understand that is all PC Steam stats.

Avowed may only be a financial success thanks to gamepass because nobody is buying it.

[–] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I know I didn’t buy it; playing with my subscription. I wonder if MS keeps these titles at 70 to try to push people to subscribe to gamepass rather than choosing more competitive pricing

[–] ampersandrew@lemmy.world 3 points 18 hours ago

Hi-Fi Rush was $30 and Hellblade II was $50. I don't know how they determine what each game ought to be worth, because Hi-Fi Rush was too low at $30, and Redfall was too high at $70.

[–] Death_Equity@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

They are wanting to raise new game prices to $90-100 because prices haven't kept up with inflation and dev costs, which will push more people to game streaming or subscription services.

Avowed could have been $30 and still sold the same because a $30 game is priced like a mediocre or shit game when you are talking open world ARPGs not made in Asia or offered as early access. I don't even think the nothingburger controversy did anything to the sales of meaning, it just doesn't seem like an interesting game from the announcement trailer to the launch trailer. The coolest thing in the trailers was the magic and that is a pretty disappointing aspect of the game.

[–] slimerancher@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

I agree with you, before this post, I was under the impression that Avowed has been a win.

Let's hope we get some numbers soon.

[–] brezel@piefed.social 1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

if steam is any indication i would not call it a success: https://steamdb.info/app/2457220/charts/#max

[–] ampersandrew@lemmy.world 2 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Which part of "concurrent players on Steam" makes it a metric that determines if the game was a success?

[–] brezel@piefed.social 1 points 50 minutes ago

not sure if the question is serious but anyway: stalker 2 was also on gamepass and had 120k concurrent users on steam while avowed had 20k.

[–] breadcat@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago

it's not really an indication considering it's a gamepass title

[–] breadcat@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 day ago
[–] Viri4thus@feddit.org -3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (2 children)

What you are hearing is Microsoft sponsored cope. Anyone, having two neurons to rub together, who enjoyed past Obsidian games is overwhelmingly disappointed at how little interactivity the world has, how limited your interactions are and how insipid it is. If this is what gamepass is bringing to the table then it will inevitably fail because at this level of quality for first party it's competing with mobile games on a much more accessible platform.

Edited to be more precise

[–] OmegaMan@lemmings.world 1 points 13 hours ago

I disagree, I've been enjoying it so far. I still think OW beats it out of the water though.

[–] ampersandrew@lemmy.world 2 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

I've played most of Obsidian's catalog at this point, and this game rules.

[–] Viri4thus@feddit.org 0 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Good for you I guess, i too would have preferred to enjoy it. Sadly, too blasé to enjoy effortless mediocre stuff.

[–] ampersandrew@lemmy.world 3 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

"Anyone who enjoyed past Obsidian games is overwhelmingly disappointed" just isn't true, so don't speak for others.