this post was submitted on 19 Dec 2023
1 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13941 readers
760 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
LENINSGHOSTFACEKILLA@hexbear.net
MiraculousMM@hexbear.net
Nakoichi@hexbear.net
corgiwithalaptop@hexbear.net
PorkrollPosadist@hexbear.net
ZoomeristLeninist@hexbear.net
EmmaGoldman@hexbear.net
sweet_pecan@hexbear.net
a_little_red_rat@hexbear.net
khizuo@hexbear.net
gaystyleJoker@hexbear.net
thelastaxolotl@hexbear.net
context@hexbear.net
Infamousblt@hexbear.net
Sulvy@hexbear.net
1
Schumer says "Okay, 'poisoning the blood' is really bad but..." (hexbear.net)
submitted 2 years ago by InevitableSwing@hexbear.net to c/chapotraphouse@hexbear.net
18 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Nitter

The Senate is creating a path for Trump to act on his fascist rhetoric | The Independent

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] nightshade@hexbear.net 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

How do Democrats still not understand that giving concessions to the "merits" of fascist rhetoric (like they're doing with trans people as well) will never make people think you're more "reasonable", and will always further normalize hatred? Or do they understand it and that's exactly why they're doing it? They've done it so many times that it has to be a conscious decision at this point, right?