this post was submitted on 03 Jul 2025
478 points (96.3% liked)

Fuck AI

3388 readers
1214 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world -3 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Insults aren't a rebuttal. You didn't explain your hypocrisy.

[–] _AutumnMoon_@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

You just copy and pasted the same crap you gave to everyone who replied without even reading what I said, there was no hypocrisy in what I said, therefor you missed the point and I have no reason to explain myself to you.

[–] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world -2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Stop lying. Using the same car analogy isn't a copy and paste.

Doing something that sucks more while complaining about those that do things that sucks less is hypocrisy.

[–] _AutumnMoon_@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You have yet to read my original comment, lmao. Not a surprise, you probably let AI think for you.

[–] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

This is what I replied to:

"Something that sucks is slightly less bad for the environment than something that also sucks. Wow very good argument"

Is there something else you are referring to that I missed?

You resort to insults because you have no defense for your argument.

[–] _AutumnMoon_@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

And you replied calling me a hypocrite for liking one thing and disliking the other, despite me saying that both sucked?

[–] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

"Great argument." was sarcasm which implies you didn't believe your earlier statement.

[–] _AutumnMoon_@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

No, it implies it's a bad defense of AI saying a bad thing isn't as bad as another bad thing doesn't negate that the first thing is bad.

[–] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Calling out hypocrisy isn't a claim that one of the two bad things isn't also bad.

[–] _AutumnMoon_@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

But you weren't calling out hypocrisy, you were just blindly defending AI even though I clearly stated both things were bad you still claimed it was hypocrisy.

[–] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I specifically called out hypocrisy! Over and over, that's all I did in my response to you.

Actually read what I wrote.

[–] _AutumnMoon_@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You called out hypocrisy when I wasn't being hypocritical. And then despite me pointing that out atleast 3 times now you are still blinding defending AI

[–] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You were defending the hypocritical point of view.

Where? At no point was I doing that. In fact you are the one being hypocritical by defending AI but calling other things that have similar environment effects bad.

[–] jsomae@lemmy.ml 0 points 3 days ago

Don't listen to them.