this post was submitted on 02 Jun 2025
522 points (98.7% liked)

News

29920 readers
3141 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The Supreme Court on Monday turned away an appeal by a group of gun rights advocates seeking to overturn Maryland's ban on assault-style rifles and high-capacity magazines under the Second Amendment.

The decision, a major win for gun safety advocates, leaves in place a ruling by the Fourth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals which ruled that the state may constitutionally prohibit sale and possession of the weapons.

The state legislation, enacted in 2013 after the Sandy Hook elementary school shooting, specifically targets the AR-15 -- the most popular rifle in America with 20-30 million in circulation. They are legal in 41 of the 50 states.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] grue@lemmy.world 13 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Considering that the point of the Second Amendment was to enable a "well regulated militia" to maintain "the security of a free state," military-relevant weapons ought to be the ones most protected by it.

The explicit goal was to enable the populace to defend itself militarily, and you're not doing that with a handgun (at least not effectively compared to using an assault rifle).

[–] pishadoot@sh.itjust.works -1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Read the federalist papers if you want to understand the 2nd amendment better. You're just as wrong as the people who like to say that the 2nd amendment was just to protect having a militia.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone -5 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Just keep ignoring entire words ("well-regulated")

[–] grue@lemmy.world 6 points 4 days ago (3 children)

In the 1700s, "well-regulated" was a synonym for "well-trained."

[–] BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Well trained and well equipped. One of the reasons the 2A exists is because Congress did such a godawful job keeping the continental army equipped during the revolutionary war. The US was originally to have no standing army but militias by and from the populace under the supervision and training of professional federal officers. With a structure like that, militia members need to be able to provide their own arms rather than rely on Congress, which was seen as untrustworthy and partial, particularly in possible disputes between states. However, the 2A was ratified at about the same time the US was realizing that a standing army of some kind was existentially necessary, following catastrophic defeats in conflicts with the natives. It was never meant to be used the way it is now being used.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

The US was originally to have no standing army

It still is; that rule never got amended. The entire US Army runs on a loophole, getting "reauthorized" each year. (The Air Force and Space Force too, I guess, since historically speaking, those are technically spin-offs of the Army.)

The Navy and Marine Corps are properly Constitutional, though. Frankly, that's the loophole they should've gone with instead: calling all ground troops "Marines," and all aircraft "Naval aviation."

[–] yetAnotherUser@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

So in order to get a gun Americans need to have training (like driver's education)?

[–] grue@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

If we actually followed the Constitution a lot of things would be different.

(Also, I would very much advocate for that.)

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone -1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

No it wasn't. But sure, anything can mean anything when you change what words mean.