this post was submitted on 12 Apr 2025
894 points (98.9% liked)

politics

22913 readers
3729 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 235 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (6 children)

Noooooooo shiiiiiiiiiiiiiit.

This is why plenty of us tried to warn people against voting for this dipshit motherfucker (not that people in a cult will listen). It's part of why it was the media's fucking job to report on how stupid his ideas were before he got fucking elected. Not necessarily The Atlantic specifically, but a lot of the media just fucking treated every insane thing he promised during the election as normal, valid, and like it could work. Total abdication of journalistic responsibility.

[–] thedruid@lemmy.world 113 points 3 days ago (3 children)

I don't get how people don't understand the role the media should play.

It should simply shine light on the truth and report the facts.

Instead they play politics, and abdicate that duty in favor of shock and schlock pieces.

If the media simply reported on Trump's policy discussions factually, everyone would have seen this coming, to add to your point.

[–] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 52 points 3 days ago (1 children)

This is why news outlets should belong to us, not to billionaires. Jeff Bezos owning the Washington Post, John Henry owning The Boston Globe, Stanley Hubbard owning multiple local news outlets, Lee Enterprises owning 75 local newspapers, these are all HUGE problems.

[–] Sprawl@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

On one hand, you don’t want purely state controlled media. On the other hand, you don’t want privately owned profit-driven media. The answer lies somewhere in the middle but how do you protect it from corruption?

[–] krashmo@lemmy.world 24 points 3 days ago (1 children)

While "the media" certainly has its issues, it's more of a convenient scapegoat than the root of the problem. Enough of us have access to all the information we could ever need to know this man was bad news and we decided it wasn't worth the effort. You can blame the media for not making it easier but ultimately we didn't do our jobs and become educated voters. That is our collective fault and no one else's.

[–] thedruid@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago

Oh it's a problem, but not THE problem, that is a statement I can agree with

[–] LeninOnAPrayer@lemm.ee 1 points 3 days ago

Yeah but advertising and profits. Duh.

If we had state restrictions on media and it's incentives that would obviously be worse. /s

[–] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 29 points 3 days ago

A lot of those media journalists you suggest don't have an obligation to journalistic responsibility .... they have a corporate responsibility to the company share holders

Top media outlets are owned by the 1% And so...

[–] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago

Don't forget the morons who didn't vote for the dipshit because of their virtue signaling about ONE war happening across the world while completely ignoring the impact the orange doofus had on the OTHER one.

[–] simplejack@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Who, aside from the MAGA media (Fox, Sinclair, OAN, etc) and CNBC dumbasses hoping for tax cuts, reported on his policies being sane?

[–] Hobbes_Dent@lemmy.world 17 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The New York Times jerked milquetoast over the whole nation. For one.

[–] simplejack@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I generally listen to their audio stuff pretty religiously, and podcasts like The Daily were fairly reliably reporting on Trump’s March toward fascism. They would even straight up use the work “fascism.”

That said, the NYT makes a lot of stuff, so maybe I missed out on something. I feel like their content adequately spooked me about what Trump’s plans were, and they motivated me to travel to a swing state to door knock.

[–] tempest@lemmy.ca 7 points 3 days ago

I listen to the daily and even now they still use euphemisms for Trump's lies instead of calling them lies. I understand it's because you can't know intent but it's still annoying.

[–] Hobbes_Dent@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

That actually reminds me, my point should be expanded. Only a bit though it’s weed o clock.

What was most amazing to me was the freedom they seem to have given to opinion columnists that did call things out. Just watching rss feeds on Lemmy every day and night on Lemmy showed a crazy contrast between opinion and the edited/published bulk. Which is kinda good and normal, the surprise is they weren’t washing opinion too maybe like WaPo.

[–] LeninOnAPrayer@lemm.ee 2 points 3 days ago

I am personally enjoying the fall of the American empire. At least for now. Until it starts invading everyone to try and prevent the inevitable.