this post was submitted on 11 Mar 2025
657 points (96.2% liked)

Canada

8766 readers
2371 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


πŸ—ΊοΈ Provinces / Territories


πŸ™οΈ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


πŸ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


πŸ’» Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


πŸ’΅ Finance, Shopping, Sales


πŸ—£οΈ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] myersguy@lemmy.simpl.website 113 points 22 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Evkob@lemmy.ca 111 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (4 children)

Hijacking the top comment to let people know this isn't in response to any American threats, this is Naval Group, a French naval defense company, showing off their submarine because Canada is looking to spend 60 billion on twelve submarines. The plans for this purchase were publicly announced on July 10, 2024.

Here's a French news article about the submarine, seeing as I couldn't seem to find any sources in English.

[–] bettylaw@lemm.ee 2 points 6 hours ago

I had real good tingle feels imagining France showing up on our coast during this part of history.
A real β€œwe got you bro” moment in my imagination.

Le sad.

[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 14 points 14 hours ago

Naval Group, a French naval defense company

Ah shit, that's the same company Australia had a deal with to buy diesel subs, before our fuckwit former PM reneged on the deal to create AUKUS and buy American nuclear subs.

[–] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 40 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

I'll take both reasons as canon, thank you very much

[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 5 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

I’ll take both reasons as cannon, thank you very much

FTFY

[–] pupbiru@aussie.zone 5 points 8 hours ago

without cannons, how will they fight?!?

[–] evasive_chimpanzee@lemmy.world 7 points 20 hours ago (3 children)

Weird that they specify "conventionally powered" in the Canadian article since this is a nuclear powered sub.

[–] VeganCheesecake@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

I'm pretty sure that's a Suffren class, and there's both diesel and nuclear powered versions. Dunno how I'd tell from the outside, and don't think the caption is necessarily all that trustworthy.

Ah, that makes sense. It's like when the car dealer shows you the version of the car you want with slightly different features since the one you want isn't on the lot yet.

[–] HellsBelle@sh.itjust.works 1 points 6 hours ago

I think it's because many nations with subs have nuclear-powered vs diesel-powered. Diesel doesn't have the vast capabilities to stay underwater for months like nuclear does.

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 2 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

I don't know if that's a mistake. It might not be a nuclear sub, just a sub which has nuclear weapons capabilities ( though obviously not this particular sub because it's still in the hands of a defence contractor ( I hope ) ).

That's an attack sub (for attacking ships/other boats), not a boomer (which have nukes).