this post was submitted on 26 Feb 2025
635 points (99.4% liked)

News

25384 readers
4136 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] inb4_FoundTheVegan@lemmy.world 149 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

We are going to be writing every day in support and defense of two pillars: personal liberties and free markets.

Democracy dies in the free market.

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 3 hours ago

"free" "market"

[–] tburkhol@lemmy.world 57 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Who wants democracy, when we can have an anarcho-capitalist libertarian utopia?

[–] TranscendentalEmpire@lemm.ee 34 points 1 day ago (4 children)

anarcho-capitalist libertarian utopia?

I hate that edgelord libertarians are trying to rebrand themselves as "anarcho-capatalist". Anarchy and capitalism are antithetical to one another. It doesn't have anything to do with anarchy if you aren't evaluating hierarchy, and capitalism is literally one of the most hierarchical organizational structures possible.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 18 points 1 day ago

anarcho-capitalist

So, sociopath.

libertarian

That's like a narcissist hat on top of a sociopath hat. It's a hat on a hat.

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 13 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Fun fact: Conservatism was literally invented by a monarchist in the aftermath of the French revolution trying to find a way for an aristocracy to exist within democracy.

[–] wolframhydroxide@sh.itjust.works 4 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

I would like to read more about this shitstain, and why I should throw axes at a printed out image of his face. Name and source?

[–] futatorius@lemm.ee 1 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Except England wasn't a democracy at the time, it was a heavily rigged parliamentary system with a limited franchise, and it could be overridden by the Lords. But yeah, conservatism represented the interests of the aristocrats, in opposition to Englightenment notions like equality, accountability, rule of law and meritocracy.

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 2 points 15 hours ago

I at least was talking about Burke, whose most influential work was talking about the French revolution, not the English revolution(s). That one was, at least in the start, a proper democracy.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 21 hours ago

edgelord libertarians are trying to rebrand themselves as "anarcho-capatalist

Actually, American style " libertarianism" IS anarcho-capitalism. They've just been trying to keep that a secret until recently.

Anarchy and capitalism are antithetical to one another.

Yes, and no. Anarcho-capitalism is anarchic in the colloquial "no rules, no order" sense, whereas political anarchy very much isn't.

The stupidity of the term is what makes it apt, though: the people politically illiterate enough to think that a total lack of regulations and worker's rights would lead to anything resembling freedom also think that the colloquial definition of anarchy is the politically accurate one.

[–] Sekoia@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 22 hours ago

It's anarchy for the hierarchies, not for the components of the hierarchies

[–] BaroqueInMind@lemmy.one 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

At least guns and ammo will be plentiful because the market will soon demand more.

[–] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 4 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Ammoseek is pretty good for ammo. Just be careful around the low rated vendors

[–] BaroqueInMind@lemmy.one 1 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

Thank you. What about good gun deals?

[–] Tja@programming.dev 2 points 1 day ago (3 children)

People voted for the leopards, you can't say it's not democracy.

[–] Raiderkev@lemmy.world 9 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

I see this comment a lot, and I legit don't think we did. I think it's weird how Elon had this team of hackers ready to go for Doge. The weird, "they'll never know what we did" comment out of his kid who seemed to be imitating Elon in the Tucker Carlson interview, and Trump's odd vote counting computers comment has me seriously thinking they hacked it. I think they both had their backs against the wall. Trump with his criminal prosecution, and musk with the starlink investigation.

With Elon, let's start at the smallest issue. Recently Musk has talked about how he's like the greatest gamer ever and is ranked super high in a bunch of games. Turns out he's just paying people to grind those games and boost his ranking. He's so concerned about being on top that he's willing to hire people to get a top the leader board and lie about how good he is to stroke his own ego. It's a very small thing, but points to a larger pattern of behavior for Musk.

Now, onto the Ukraine thing. If anyone remembers, he wouldn't let Ukraine use starlink for an attack because he was "worried it'd start a nuclear war." Whether it would or wouldn't was not up to him as the guy selling Internet satellites to the government. He had provided all the starlink kits to Ukraine during a war to help them, and the US was paying it. He was not supposed to be the arbiter of what they could/ couldn't be used for. I wouldn't be surprised if they were going to come after him for treason as he actively aided a (then) adversary through this action.

https://apnews.com/article/spacex-ukraine-starlink-russia-air-force-fde93d9a69d7dbd1326022ecfdbc53c2

Trump and Musk had to win, or they were fucked. The guy that worked for Doge happened to make a sketchy ballot counting app which you can read about below that could have been used to disqualify dem ballots.

https://bsky.app/profile/denisedwheeler.bsky.social/post/3lhowh3ijgs2f

Elon has always found ways around the rules. When his company needed money all of the sudden magically the value exploded. I think he was involved in squeezing the stock price up through the use of call options, and once that happened, they were able to raise money in the form of multiple stock sales. You can read this now 5 year old thread that proves itself time and time again. Do I have any proof Elon was behind this? No, but who has enough money to do something like this?

https://www.reddit.com/r/options/comments/hk7nqe/tesla_infinity_call_gamma_squeeze/

When the election came in 2024, Elon gave away (illegally I might add) $100 to anyone who registered Republican. There had to be something nefarious going on there too. I would not be surprised if they thought anyone who took them up on that was only doing it for the free money and wasn't actually going to vote so they cast ballots in their names. Again, I have no proof, but if anyone would have the will to do something so shitty to win, it'd be him.

As for Trump, Jack Smith said they had enough evidence to convict Trump, and only couldn't because of arbitrary sitting president rules. They have like a 99% conviction rate for a reason.

Trump and Musk are absolutely petty enough to bend / break rules and laws to get what they want, and are going to go all out to avoid prison. I strongly believe that this is not what we voted for, and we are going to be stuck with this the rest of our lives because what is happening cannot be undone, and they will cling to power as long as possible to avoid facing any consequences. They will break everything and fire anyone who was involved in any way shape or form in any of the investigations and will break the system beyond repair to ensure that they remain in power. Elections are still going to happen, but they will never be voted out.

[–] Tja@programming.dev 5 points 23 hours ago

That's a very well written comment, and Elon and trump certainly have committed more crimes than we can count, but the polls before the election were all pointing to the same result, so trumps victory wasn't a major upset. I don't think they hacked the election, I think the people are that dumb.

[–] metaldream@sopuli.xyz 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

A real democracy wouldn't allow a fascist to even run for office. Advocating for fascism and authoritarianism in a republic isn't a valid political stance. It's sedition.

[–] Tja@programming.dev -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Well, if over 50% of votes agree, is it sedition? The American people wanted the treasonous, corrupt, criminal, draft dodger sexual predator as president. We might not like it, but it's what the majority wanted.

[–] metaldream@sopuli.xyz 4 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

*Plurality and it's still sedition on the part of the leaders. If you advocate for authoritarianism in a republic then you are inherently advocating for overthrowing the republic. You are advocating for some people to have rights, while others don't.

It doesn't matter if a majority of voters want that, they don't have the right to strip the minority of their right to representation.

All authoritarian ideologies are inherently incompatible with the concept of natural rights

[–] Tja@programming.dev -1 points 23 hours ago

Those who don't vote make an explicit choice, so it is a majority.

And the fascist, dictatorial intentions were known from the beginning so kind of hard to argue with the result.

People voted to convert the republic to an empire.

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 day ago

In a more democratic system there wouldn’t be president Trump because there would be no presidents. So I disagree with the premise.

The presidency is fundamentally undemocratic, regardless of the quasi-performative democratic ritual by which he is selected.

[–] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 2 points 18 hours ago
[–] futatorius@lemm.ee 2 points 23 hours ago

There is no such thing as a free market.