this post was submitted on 29 Jul 2023
510 points (94.0% liked)

politics

23299 readers
4604 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] HelixDab2@lemm.ee 30 points 2 years ago (4 children)

This is such a stupid and irresponsible article.

First, Trump has to be found guilty.

Second, he has to be found guilty before the elections.

Third, he has to lose the election (which is more or less a toss-up), because if he wins the election, he'll pardon himself on all federal charges.

Fourth, even if all of that other shit happens, he has to be ordered to report to jail immediately after sentencing, without waiting for an appeal that will certainly be attempted.

This relies on so many things happening in just the right order that it's functionally speculation.

If Putin "accidentally" hits a NATO target while trying to strike Ukraine, and if NATO responds in kind, and if Putin reacts to NATO's response by launching nuclear weapons, and if NATO countries respond by launching a full-scale nuclear attach on Russia, then the world will have global thermonuclear war and humanity will have solved human-created climate change via nuclear winter! Yeah, it's all possible, but it's not probable.

[–] Smoogs@lemmy.world 14 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Let’s throw some more logs on this fire….

Donald Trump has been charged with 37 criminal counts covering seven different violations of federal law

The election is nov 2024

The trial starts in august 2023

There are at least 10 other candidates running for republican

[–] CmdrShepard42@lemm.ee 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

And this pardon would only apply to a federal conviction while Trump is facing charges in both state and federal courts.

[–] HelixDab2@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago

The NYS charges are a joke. Yes, it's a crime, but it's also the kind of thing that would normally get pled out to the level of a parking ticket if it was a one-off thing. Which this appears to be. (One-off, in this case, meaning that they don't have multiple instances to charge him with.) It looks political, because it probably is. Jail time is incredibly unlikely, even if the case wraps prior to the election.

Fani Willis here in GA will have a pretty solid case, assuming that the grand jury indicts (which is probable). But that case will probably get bumped in favor of the federal charges, and would be unlikely to go to trial, and be concluded prior to the election. And if Trump wins prior to the trial being concluded, then a conviction won't matter. Yeah, he can't pardon himself from state charges, but he's not going to prison while he's in office.

[–] TheDoozer@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

It will be interesting what happens if Trump primaries during the trial, gets picked up for the Republican nomination, then gets convicted and sent to prison. Does it just go to the #2 in the primaries? Will the right galvanize behind their second choice? Will a bunch of Forever Trumpers be upset enough to just not vote? With Trump out of the race, will the Left have enough momentum without Trump as the villain to vote against (yeah, I get the alternative is DeSantis, who is not exactly popular with anyone who doesn't think Romney is a Leftist)?

Should be interesting if he ends up convicted.

[–] ashok36@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

he has to lose the election (which is more or less a toss-up)

I don't see how Trump wins in 2024. He lost, badly, in 2020 and that's with the incumbent advantage. Now Biden has the incumbent advantage and isn't restricted to campaigning from his basement because some asshole fucked up the response to a pandemic. Meanwhile Trump is hemorrhaging cash paying for lawyers to defend him from multiple ongoing and imminent criminal indictments. He'll find time to hold his stupid rallies every couple of days but he will be distracted and unfocused (even for Trump). He's performed worse than the last time every election since 2016 (2018 lost the house, 2020 lost the presidency and the senate, 2022 all his favored candidates lost and Rs didn't get the Senate back and barely won the House).

The 2024 race is Biden's to lose and unless there's some sort of health issue that takes him out or there's a huge scandal that actually has some substance to it, I think he walks away with it.

[–] HelixDab2@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago

Straw polls are pretty close right now. While I like to hope that Biden would win, since Biden has been pretty innocuous--not good, not bad, just more of the same normalcy that we had prior to Trump--that's just not a sure thing.

[–] LakesLem@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Yes and bearing in mind that at this point justice is probably considered a "woke" concept and he'll get cheered on.

[–] HelixDab2@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago

We're definitely seeing that in the conservative bubble; that why anyone that wants to be in serious contention for the Republican nomination has to say that it's a "witch hunt".

Personally, I wish it was; I'd love to see Trump pressed with stones until he confessed.