Thanks for the info and phasing it with nuance!!
Anything else would be in danger of falling into the "Nirvana fallacy" category
Thanks for the info and phasing it with nuance!!
Anything else would be in danger of falling into the "Nirvana fallacy" category
Depression resistance +1000
Ich dachte, dass automatisch alles gelöscht wird innerhalb einiger Stunden, wäre eh eine Pflichteinstellung
The good old 360 days of quickly opening the message menu to flame someone ingame ,but then taking 20 years to type out all the letters
No >:[ buy from MY Europe
Oh wow, theres more to this discussion, nicely useful!
says:
evaluate on case-by-case basis
So its kind of in a grey zone, not reliable doesnt mean bad source in that case. Useful link, altough wikipedia is also a grey zone in the sense that its information based on open source (everybody can edit it, and most liked proposals get through as I understand)
Thanks for the confirmation
Well what ground news wants to do -critical evaluation and media literacy- is so vital.
But ground news deciding on what exact position on the spectrum a source is, seems to achieve the exact oposite: make people depentend in questioning and finding a variety of sources.
Nowadays everything needs to happen in an instant.
If theres a solution that only takes half a snap, that will be the only relevant choice for the mass. Thats why Im instantly asking, because just today I referred to this source to someone else as a might-be-bad example but instantly realized, I will have to ask this on the next situation (now)
Anyways thanks for the correction!
by a first glance just discovering this, looks like narcissism.
They will do everything - like deleting the obvious - before allowing being on par with the people they initially disagreed with
Wie nichtmal versucht wird das glaubhaft zu gestalten Xd
Faschos