this post was submitted on 20 Jul 2023
21 points (71.4% liked)

Canada

8035 readers
581 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
top 38 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca 47 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

I am usually reluctant to link to The Sun but it's extremely interesting to remember what most of the right thought about PP ten years ago...

https://torontosun.com/2013/07/15/pipsqueak-promotion-cheapens-shuffle

Pipsqueak is one of the Conservative Horsemen of the Apocalypse. Like the Biblical Horsemen, everything he says and does is bad. Everything that is good that he touches withers and dies.

Pipsqueak, who Harper actually named minister of state for democratic reform, is in fact one of the most despicable, loathsome politicians to ever grace the national stage. He is a pestilence made flesh.

A refresher: Pipsqueak is the Conservative MP who famously joked about “tar babies” in the House of Commons, a derogatory term to describe blacks. He is the MP who attacked Harper for compensating aboriginal residential schools victims, opining that what those lazy natives needed was “hard work.” He is the MP who told his fellow MPs “f--- you guys,” and then later said he would “confiscate” the tape of the occasion.

He is the Conservative MP who can always be counted upon to do the bidding of the adolescents in PMO. He is the MP who even big-C Conservative commentators, like the Ottawa Citizen’s Randy Denley, say is the poster child of “red-necked bigots” in his Nepean-Carleton riding. Ouch.

There is more, much more, but you get the point. Pipsqueak Pierre Poilievre is a disgrace to Parliament. He is a joke. And whatever Harper may have accomplished with his shuffle was unalterably diminished by the promotion of Pipsqueak.

[–] HikingVet@lemmy.sdf.org 27 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Yeah people forget that he's been shitty for a long time, and that he isn't some outsider.

[–] investorsexchange@lemmy.ca 22 points 2 years ago

The problem was never his glasses.

[–] mPony@kbin.social 13 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I still say his hard-on for defunding the CBC goes all the way back to The Mercer Report.

I had people challenge me on that belief awhile back, saying that nobody could hold a grudge that long. And yet we find out today that one producer stopped Babylon 5 in its tracks for 20 fucking years. So yes, Internet, people in power can hold a grudge as long as they goddamn please.

[–] T0RB1T@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

Wait, I'm actually really curious about this Babylon 5 tidbit. Who was that? What happened?

[–] MyDogLovesMe@sh.itjust.works 14 points 2 years ago

“A refresher: Pipsqueak is the Conservative MP who famously joked about “tar babies” in the House of Commons, a derogatory term to describe blacks. He is the MP who attacked Harper for compensating aboriginal residential schools victims, opining that what those lazy natives needed was “hard work.” He is the MP who told his fellow MPs “f--- you guys,” and then later said he would “confiscate” the tape of the occasion.”

What piece of shit.

[–] SilentStorms@lemmy.ca 39 points 2 years ago (2 children)
[–] InvaderSkooge@sh.itjust.works 11 points 2 years ago

That is totally what he looks like without them too!

[–] MagpieRhymes@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago

On the one hand, I am loathe to mock or belittle people based on their physical appearance - it’s cruel and immature.

On the other hand, he chose to make this change and holy shit but does he ever look exactly like a glasses-less Milhouse, and it makes me giggle like a small child.

[–] Ulrich_the_Old@lemmy.ca 35 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Perhaps he should drop his racist "base".

[–] arcticpiecitylights@beehaw.org 5 points 2 years ago

I mean, tbf, he's pretty racist himself

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 years ago

Best I can do is contacts.

[–] stealth_cookies@lemmy.ca 29 points 2 years ago (3 children)

This seems like they are trying the political version of the trope where the "ugly duckling nerd" come back to school after summer with a new haircut and contacts and is suddenly "hot".

Do they really think the people on this country are that stupid? Polliviere is still the same cretin he was before.

[–] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 29 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Remember when they had Stockwell Day arrive at a press conference in a seadoo?

These guys do everything under the sun other than try to meaningfully help people or be accepting of different cultures / ideas / sexuality ... and instead try to pretend to be hip and new.

Whenever they try ... they just come off looking like idiots.

[–] stealth_cookies@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 years ago

Agreed, it sucks to sit here and see every party doing easy things that makes them look good rather than tackling the real problems under their jurisdictions. It extends far past the topics you mentioned, including inflation, housing prices, healthcare, infrastructure, etc.

I'm beginning to think that the Conservatives drank their own kool-aid and actually believe Trudeau only won due to his hair.

[–] snoons@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

It works though, albeit only on people that use their emotions for decision making.

[–] Grimpen@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 years ago

I suspect a good portion of the people who would be fooled, are already PP supporters.

I suppose it might make a slight bump, and with FPTP, sometimes that's all you need, but still seems like window-dressing, because it is.

[–] snoons@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 years ago

Do they really think the people on this country are that stupid?

Some of them are, at least in the critical thinking and self perception department.

[–] Chrisosaur@kbin.social 5 points 2 years ago

They forgot the bit where the “ugly duckling nerd” is clearly a fucking smoke show and they had to work hard to make them seem ugly.

[–] Gleddified@lemmy.ca 15 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Jesus H. Christ, may we someday be able to have an election based on policy and not the fashion choices of the candidates.

[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca 8 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Pretty sure Trudeau won his office on the basis of his boxing and yoga.

[–] S_204@lemmy.ca 8 points 2 years ago

C'mon, it was his hair and we all know that.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Good luck. It's yet to happen in a democracy anywhere.

(Mandatory mention that autocracies have different, even worse problems)

[–] Lucz1848@lemmy.ca 15 points 2 years ago

It won't work, Milhouse.

[–] MyDogLovesMe@sh.itjust.works 14 points 2 years ago

He is still “Canada’s Most Punchable Face”

Like our Shkrelli of Canadian politics.

[–] RandAlThor@lemmy.ca 14 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Woohoo! Hey can you get a new personality at the same time too?

[–] grte@lemmy.ca 20 points 2 years ago

And a new set of political beliefs.

[–] FreeBooteR69@kbin.social 16 points 2 years ago (1 children)

They made him look too smart. The base hates smart, that's elitist.

[–] SymbolicLink@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 years ago

"If I don't personally understand it, and it might change the way I do/view things, must be a conspiracy"

Wilful ignorance

[–] nyan@lemmy.cafe 11 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Does he actually think this is going to fool anyone?

[–] MapleEngineer@lemmy.ca 8 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] nyan@lemmy.cafe 7 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Did it, though? Superman got away with it in part because Clark Kent didn't really act like Superman (in all the iterations I've encountered, anyway, which I admit don't include the original comics), so anyone who might be able to see past the glasses would give him a sidelong look and go, ". . . Nah."

It'll be a cold day in hell before Poilievre changes his attitude that much.

[–] MapleEngineer@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 years ago

Fair point.

[–] Pxtl@sh.itjust.works 9 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I feel like he's also forcing his eyes open wider. He tends to squint when he's relaxed, and these days his brow is constantly furrowed. Like, he's always trying to make himself look surprised to fight against his own natural squint.

It must be exhausting.

[–] zephyreks@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Honestly he looks better without glasses

[–] mPony@kbin.social 7 points 2 years ago

honestly he looks like Milhouse with or without glasses.

[–] arcticpiecitylights@beehaw.org 3 points 2 years ago

I actually disagree - the glasses were kind of his thing...

load more comments
view more: next ›